Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Porsche Cars North America, Inc. |
|---|
Topics: Porsche Macan
|
Christopher J. Bonanti
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
November 8, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67213-67215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26809]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Porsche Cars North America,
Inc. (Porsche) petition for exemption of the Macan vehicle line in
accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption From Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2014 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W43-439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated July 25, 2013, Porsche
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR
part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard for the Macan
vehicle line beginning with MY 2014. The petition requested exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption From Vehicle
Theft Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, Porsche
provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design,
and location of the components of the antitheft device for its new
Porsche Macan vehicle line. Porsche stated that all Porsche Macan
vehicles will be equipped with a passive antitheft device as standard
equipment beginning with MY 2014. Key components of the antitheft
device will include a microprocessor-based immobilizer system,
electronic ignition switch, transponder key, remote control unit,
alarm/central locking control unit, optional keyless entry system and
electronic parking brake. The device will also be equipped with an
audible and visible alarm. Additionally, Porsche stated that the
central locking system works in conjunction with the audible and
visible alarm. Locking the doors with the ignition key, the remote
control or a door switch (with the keyless entry
[[Page 67214]]
option) will activate the audible and visible alarm. An ultrasonic
sensor in the alarm system will monitor the doors, rear luggage
compartment, front deck lid, fuel filler door, and interior movement.
The horn will sound and the lights will flash if there is any detection
of unauthorized use. Porsche's submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7 in that it meets the general
requirements contained in 543.5 and the specific content requirements
of 543.6.
Porsche stated that the immobilizer system cannot be disabled
unless an original key or optional keyless entry key sends the proper
code to the immobilizer system instructing the engine management system
via a code to begin functioning again. The immobilizer is automatically
activated when the key is removed from the ignition switch assembly,
or, with the optional keyless entry, the immobilizer is automatically
activated after the engine is turned off from the dashboard control
switch. The immobilizer then returns to its normal ``off'' state, where
engine starting and transmission starting are not allowed. Starting the
engine and operation of the vehicle will be allowed only when the
correct code is sent to the control unit by using the correct key in
the ignition switch, or by having the correct keyless entry key within
the occupant compartment of the car. The ignition key contains a radio
signal transponder, which signals the control unit to allow the engine
to be started. With the keyless entry system, operation of the vehicle
is allowed when the ignition key is substituted with the special key
that contains a radio signal transmitter similar to the transponder in
the standard ignition key.
Porsche stated that its central locking system works in conjunction
with its audible and visible alarm. Locking the doors with the ignition
key, the remote control or a door switch (with the keyless entry
option) will also activate the audible and visible alarm. Porsche also
stated that the immobilizer cannot be disabled by manipulation of the
door locks or central-locking system because the locks/locking system
are incapable of sending the code needed to disable the device.
As an additional feature, Porsche stated that it will also
incorporate an electronically activated parking brake on the Macan
vehicle which is electronically activated and integrated into the
vehicle's antitheft device. Porsche stated that if the control unit
does not receive the correct code from the ignition key or keyless
entry key, the parking brake will remain activated and the vehicle
cannot be towed away.
Since the Porsche Macan is a new vehicle line, there is currently
no available theft rate data published by the agency for the vehicle
line. However, Porsche provided data on the effectiveness of other
similar antitheft devices that have been installed on its 911 and
Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines in support of its belief that its proposed
device will be at least as effective as those comparable devices
previously granted exemptions by the agency. Porsche's data showed that
the theft rate for the 911 and Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines remained
consistently low over a three-year period. Using an average of 3 MYs'
theft data (2008-2010), the theft rates for the Porsche 911 and
Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines are 0.4771 and 0.2283 respectively.
Porsche also stated that the off-board antitheft concept introduced on
its MY 2010 Panamera vehicle line will continue to be utilized on its
Macan vehicles. Therefore, Porsche believes that the demand for Porsche
vehicle components will be further reduced. The theft rate for the MY
2010 Panamera vehicle line is 1.2656. Based on the experience of these
vehicle lines, Porsche has concluded that the antitheft device proposed
for its Porsche Macan vehicle line is no less effective than those
devices in lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption
from the parts-marking requirements. The agency agrees that the device
is substantially similar to devices in these and other vehicle lines
for which the agency has already granted exemptions.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Porsche
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Porsche
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Porsche provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., extreme temperature
tests, voltage spike tests, reverse polarity tests, electromagnetic
interference tests, vibration test and endurance tests) and believes
that the device is reliable and durable since the device complied with
its specific requirements for each test. Additionally, Porsche stated
that the antitheft device also features a built-in self-diagnostic that
constantly checks for system failures. If a failure is detected, an
alarm indicator will signal the driver.
Porsche further states that disablement of the immobilizer is
virtually impossible. Disconnecting power to the antitheft device does
not affect the operation of the device. Once the antitheft device is
activated, the device stays activated until the correct key or optional
keyless entry key is used to instruct the engine management system
through the proper code to begin functioning again.
In further support of the reliability of its antitheft device,
Porsche informed the agency that it will continue to use the ``off-
board'' antitheft strategy that reduces the marketability of stolen
electronic components and making the theft of vehicles unattractive.
Specifically, Porsche stated that during the production of its vehicle,
the initialization and registration of various antitheft electronic
components are recorded in a central database. If the components have
to be repaired or replaced, authorized access to the database must be
obtained to receive authorization for the components. If authorized
access to the central database is unavailable or the database indicates
that the components are not authorized, further operation and use of
the vehicle will be restricted or impossible to obtain.
Based on the evidence submitted by Porsche, the agency believes
that the antitheft device for the Macan vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7 (b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Porsche has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for the Porsche Macan vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This conclusion is based on the
information Porsche provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation;
attracting attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons to enter or
operate a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
[[Page 67215]]
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Porsche's petition for exemption for the Porsche Macan vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency notes that
49 CFR Part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted
from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard for a given
model year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts
marking requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard.
The agency notes that Porsche was significantly delayed in
submitting its petition for exemption for its MY 2014 Macan vehicle
line. As specified under paragraph (4) of Sec. 543.5(b), a petition
for an exemption must be submitted at least 8 months before the
commencement of production for the first model year in which the
petitioner wishes those lines to be exempted. Porsche is reminded of
its statutory requirement for meeting this timeline when submitting
future petitions for exemptions.
If Porsche decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5 and
541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Porsche wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2013-26809 Filed 11-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P