Notice of Funding Availability for the Tribal Transportation Program Safety Funding |
|---|
|
Gregory G. Nadeau
Federal Highway Administration
June 26, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36885-36891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Funding Availability for the Tribal Transportation
Program Safety Funding
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of funding and requests
grant applications for FHWA's Tribal Transportation Program Safety
Funds (TTPSF). In addition, this notice identifies selection criteria,
application requirements, and technical assistance during the grant
solicitation period for the TTPSF.
The TTPSF is authorized within the Tribal Transportation Program
(TTP) under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-
21), as extended. The FHWA will distribute these funds as described in
this notice on a competitive basis in a manner consistent with the
selection criteria.
DATES: Applications must be submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov no later
than 5 p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015 (the ``application deadline'').
Applicants are encouraged to submit applications in advance of the
application deadline; however, applications will not be evaluated, and
awards will not be made until after the application deadline.
The FHWA plans to conduct outreach regarding the TTPSF in the form
of a Webinar on July 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., e.t. To join the Webinar,
please click this link then enter the room as a guest: https://connectdot.connectsolutions.com/tribaltrans/. The audio portion of the
Webinar can be accessed from this teleconference line: TOLL FREE 1-888-
251-2909; ACCESS CODE 4442306. The Webinar will be recorded and posted
on FHWA's Web site at: http://www.flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/. A TDD is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing at 202-366-3993.
ADDRESSES: Applications must be submitted electronically to
ttpsf@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning
this notice please contact Russell Garcia, TTPSF Program Manager, via
email at russell.garcia@dot.gov; by telephone at 202-366-9815; or by
mail at Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For legal
questions, please contact Ms. Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief
Counsel, by telephone at (720) 963-3445; by email at
vivian.philbin@dot.gov; or by mail at Federal Highway Administration,
Central Federal Lands Highway Division, 12300 West Dakota Avenue,
Lakewood, CO 80228. Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. m.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2013, FHWA published the first
notice of funding availability for the TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On November
13, 2013, FHWA awarded 183 tribes a total of $8.6 million for 193
projects. On May 14, 2014, FHWA published the second notice of funding
availability for the TTPSF (78 FR 47480). On March 10, 2015, FHWA
awarded 82 tribes a total of $8.5 million for 94 projects to improve
transportation safety on tribal lands. The FHWA is publishing this
third notice to announce the availability of an additional round of
funding and request grant applications.
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management
(SAM)
4. Submission Dates and Time
5. Intergovernmental Review
6. Funding Restrictions
7. Other Submission Requirements
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities (funding goal 40
percent of TTPSF)
ii. Engineering Improvements (funding goal 30 percent of TTPSF)
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services Improvements (funding
goal 20 percent of TTPSF)
iv. Education Programs (funding goal 10 percent of TTPSF)
2. Review and Selection Process
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities
ii. Engineering Improvements
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
iv. Education Programs
F. Federal Award Administration Information
1. Federal Award Notice
2. Administrative and National Policy
3. Reporting
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business Information
A. Program Description
Since the TTPSF was created under MAP-21, $17.1 million has been
awarded to 265 Indian tribes for 287 projects to address safety issues
in Indian country over two rounds of competitive grants. The intent of
the TTPSF is to address the prevention and reduction of death or
serious injuries in transportation related crashes on tribal lands
where statistics are consistently higher than the rest of the nation as
a whole.
The TTPSF emphasizes the development of Strategic Transportation
Safety Plans using a data driven process as a means for tribes to
determine how transportation safety needs will be addressed in tribal
communities. Tribal Transportation Safety Plans are a tool used to
identify risk factors that lead to serious injury or death and organize
various entities to strategically reduce risk; projects submitted must
be tied to a comprehensive safety strategy and be based on incident
history (i.e., data).
Throughout the past two grant cycles, TTPSF awards have supported
safety
[[Page 36886]]
planning, engineering, enforcement and emergency services, and
education projects. Successful TTPSF projects leverage resources,
encourage partnership, and have the data to support the applicants'
approach in addressing the prevention and reduction of death or serious
injuries in transportation related crashes. A listing of the safety
projects/activities that were previously submitted by the Tribes and
awarded TTP safety funds, as well as additional safety related
information can be found on the TTP Safety Web site at http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm.
In FY 2015, the TTPSF will continue to fund projects of all
eligible types, including projects that are highway safety improvement
projects eligible under the Highway Safety Improvement Program as
described in 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 148(a)(4), in the same four
categories identified in the previous two rounds: (1) Safety plans and
safety planning activities (40 percent); (2) engineering improvements
(30 percent); (3) enforcement and emergency services improvements (20
percent); and (4) education programs (10 percent).
The TTPSF Web site includes a series of tools to help an applicant
prepare a successful grant application. Please explore the grant
application tools at: http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm.
B. Federal Award Information
The MAP-21 (Pub. L. 112-141) authorizes TTPSF as a set aside of not
more than 2 percent of the funds made available under the TTP for FY
2013 and 2014. The Highway Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (Pub. L.
113-159) extended the provisions of MAP-21, including the TTPSF set
aside, through May 31, 2015. Although the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 TTPSF
full-year funding level is unknown at this time, this notice of funding
availability solicits proposals under the TTPSF for FY 2015. Section
202(e) of Title 23, U.S.C., provides that funds are to be allocated
based on an identification and analysis of highway safety issues and
opportunities on tribal lands, as determined by the Secretary, on
application of the Indian tribal governments for eligible projects
described in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4). Eligible projects described in
section 148(a)(4) include strategies, activities, and projects on a
public road that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety
plan and correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature, or
address a highway safety problem.
Section 202(e) further specifies that in applying for TTPSF, an
Indian tribal government, in cooperation with the Secretary of the
Interior and, as appropriate, with a State, local government, or
metropolitan planning organization, shall select projects from the
transportation improvement program, subject to the approval of the
Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of the Interior.
Upon award, TTPSF will be administered the same way as all TTP
funds: FHWA Agreement tribes will receive funds in accordance with
their Program Agreement through a Referenced Funding Agreement (RFA);
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Agreement tribes will receive their
funds through their BIA Regional Office; and Compact tribes will
receive their funds through the Department of the Interior's Office of
Self Governance. Upon completion of a TTPSF project, funds that are not
expended are to be recovered and returned to the TTPSF funding pool to
be made available for the following TTPSF grant cycle.
C. Eligibility Information
To be selected for a TTPSF award, an applicant must be a federally
recognized Indian tribe and the project must be an Eligible Project.
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Applicants for TTPSF discretionary grants are federally
recognized tribes identified on the list of ``Indian Entities
Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services from the Bureau of Indian
Affairs'' (published at 77 FR 47868). Other entities may partner with a
tribal government to submit an application, but the Eligible Applicant
must be a federally recognized Indian tribe. A tribe may submit more
than one application; however, only one project may be included in each
application.
Recipients of prior TTPSF funds may submit applications during this
current round according to the selection criteria. However, to be
competitive, the applicant should demonstrate the extent to which the
previously funded project or projects has been able to meet estimated
project schedules and budget, as well as the ability to realize the
outcomes for previous awards.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
There is no matching requirement for the TTPSF. However, if the
total amount of funding requested for applications rated ``highly
qualified'' or ``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding,
FHWA will give priority consideration to those projects that show a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF funding
request. Therefore, leveraging a TTPSF request with other funding
sources identified in Section E is encouraged.
D. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
Application package can be downloaded from the TTPSF Web site:
http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/ttpsf.htm. Applicants may
also request a paper copy of this application package by contacting
Russell Garcia at 202-366-9815. For a Telephone Device for the Deaf
(TDD) please call 202-366-3993. The application must be submitted
through ttpsf@dot.gov. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications
in advance of the application deadline; however, applications will not
be evaluated, and awards will not be made until after the application
deadline.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Additional information, including additional data, may be requested
by FHWA to clarify an application, but FHWA encourages applicants to
submit the most relevant and complete information the applicant can
provide. The FHWA also encourages applicants, to the extent
practicable, to provide data and evidence of project merits in a form
that is publicly available or verifiable.
The applicants should include the following information in their
applications:
i. Standard Form 424, Applications for Federal Assistance
A complete application must consist of the Standard Form 424 (SF
424) available at http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety.
ii. Narrative (Attachment to SF 424)
Applicants must attach a supplemental narrative to their submission
to successfully complete the application process. The applicant must
include the supplemental narrative in the attachments section of the SF
424 mandatory form.
The applicant must identify the eligibility category for which the
applicant is seeking funds in the project narrative. In addition, the
applicant should address each question or statement in the application.
It is recommended that the applicant use standard formatting (e.g., a
single-spaced document, using a standard 12-point font, such as Times
New Roman, with 1-inch margins) to prepare their
[[Page 36887]]
application narrative. An application must include any information
needed to verify that the project meets the statutory eligibility
criteria in order for the FHWA to evaluate the application against
TTPSF criteria.
Applicants should demonstrate the responsiveness of their proposal
to any pertinent selection criteria with the most relevant information
that applicants can provide, and substantiated by data, regardless of
whether such information is specifically requested, or identified, in
the final notice. Applicants should provide evidence of the feasibility
of achieving certain project milestones, financial capacity, and
commitment in order to support project readiness.
Consistent with the requirements for an eligible highway safety
improvement project under 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), applicants must describe
clearly how the project would correct or improve a hazardous road
location or feature, or would address a highway safety problem. The
application must include supporting data.
For ease of review, FHWA recommends that the project narrative
generally adhere to the following basic outline, and include a table of
contents, project abstract, maps, and graphics:
a. Project Abstract: Describe project work that would be completed
under the project, the hazardous road location or feature or the
highway safety problem that the project would address, and whether the
project is a complete project or part of a larger project with prior
investment (maximum five sentences). The project abstract must
succinctly describe how this specific request for TTPSF would be used
to complete the project.
b. Project Description: Include information on the expected users
of the project, a description of the hazardous road location or feature
or the highway safety problem that the project would address, and how
the project would address these challenges;
c. Applicant information and coordination with other entities:
Identify the Indian tribal government applying for TTPSF, a description
of cooperation with other entities in selecting projects from the TIP
as required under 23 U.S.C. 202(e)(2), and information regarding any
other entities involved in the project;
d. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds: Include
information about the amount of grant funding requested for the
project, availability/commitment of funds sources and uses of all
project funds, total project costs, percentage of project costs that
would be paid for with the TTPSF, and the identity and percentage
shares of all parties providing funds for the project (including
Federal funds provided under other programs);
e. Include a description of how the proposal meets the Selection
Criteria identified in Section E, Subsection 1 Criteria.
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM)
The TTPSF requires applicants to be either registered in SAM or
provide their Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
application.
4. Submission Dates and Time
i. Deadline--Applications must be submitted through ttpsf@dot.gov
no later than 5 p.m., e.t. on August 25, 2015 (the ``application
deadline'').
ii. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications in advance of
the application deadline; however, applications will not be evaluated,
and awards will not be made until after the application deadline.
iii. Upon submission of the applications to ttpsf@dot.gov, the
applicants will receive automatic reply confirming transmittal of the
application to the FHWA. Please contact Russell Garcia at 202-366-9815,
should you not receive any confirmation from the FHWA.
iv. Late Applications--Applications received after the deadline
will not be considered except in the case of unforeseen technical
difficulties that are beyond the applicant's control. The FHWA will
consider late applications on a case-by-case basis. Applicants are
encouraged to submit additional information documenting the technical
difficulties experienced, including a screen capture of any error
messages received.
5. Intergovernmental Review
The TTPSF is not subject to the Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
6. Funding Restrictions
There are no funding restrictions on any applications. However,
FHWA anticipates high demand for this limited amount of funding and
encourages applications with scalable requests that allow more tribes
to receive funding and for requests that identify a commitment of other
funding sources to complement the TTPSF funding request. Applicants
should demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed
request in a timely manner, and ensure that cost estimates and
timelines to complete deliverables are included in their application.
7. Other Submission Requirements
Applications must be submitted electronically to ttpsf@dot.gov.
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
The FHWA will award TTPSF funds based on the selection criteria and
policy considerations as outlined below. However, to be competitive,
the applicant should demonstrate the extent to which a previously
funded project or projects has been able to meet estimated project
schedules and budget, as well as the ability to realize the outcomes
for previous awards.
The FHWA shall give priority consideration to eligible projects
under 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4) that fall within one of the following four
categories:
(1) Safety plans and safety planning activities;
(2) engineering improvements;
(3) enforcement and emergency services improvements; and
(4) education programs.
The priority categories were determined in consultation with the
Tribal Transportation Program Coordinating Committee (TTPCC) and are
intended to strengthen safety plans and safety planning activities in
tribal transportation while also directing resources to needed safety
improvements. The categories are also consistent with the FHWA State
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (State SHSP) for Indian Lands which has
as its mission to, ``Implement effective transportation safety programs
to save lives while respecting Native American culture and tradition by
fostering communication, coordination, collaboration, and
cooperation.'' These categories are also consistent with the Tribal
Safety Management Implementation Plan (TSMIP). The TSMIP recognizes
that, ``tribal safety plans are an essential component and an effective
planning tool for prioritizing and implementing safety solutions.'' The
TSMIP also states that ``reducing highway fatalities and serious
injuries with any sustained success requires that all four elements
(4Es) of highway safety be addressed--engineering, enforcement,
education, and emergency services. A Tribal Safety Program, whether
large or small, should work to address the 4Es, and its foundation,
data.''
The FHWA will allocate the TTPSF among the four categories as
follows: (1) Safety plans and safety planning activities (40 percent);
(2) engineering improvements (30 percent); (3) enforcement and
emergency services improvements (20 percent); and (4)
[[Page 36888]]
education programs (10 percent). These funding goals were established
with the TTPCC and will be reviewed annually and may be adjusted to
reflect current tribal transportation safety priorities and needs.
These proposed allocation amounts provide substantial funding for
tribal safety plans to reflect the strong need that has been identified
in this area and to ensure that all tribes have an opportunity to
assess their safety needs and prioritize safety projects. The remaining
proposed allocation amounts were established based on the significant
need for transportation related capital improvement projects, while
still allowing for applications that would cover all 4Es of safety.
Because these percentages are only goals, they may be further adjusted
to reflect the amounts requested in the applications received in
response to this notice.
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities (Funding Goal 40 Percent
of TTPSF)
The development of a tribal safety plan that is data driven,
identifies transportation safety issues, prioritizes activities, is
coordinated with the State SHSP, and promotes a comprehensive approach
to addressing safety needs by including all 4Es, is a critical step in
improving highway safety. Additional information on developing a tribal
safety plan can be found at: http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Accordingly, FHWA will award TTPSF for developing and updating
tribal safety plans, and other safety planning activities. Example
projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be found at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for tribal safety plans: (1) Development of a tribal
safety plan where none currently exists, and (2) age or status of an
existing tribal safety plan.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of TTPSF
funding requests for safety planning activities: (1) Inclusion of the
activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation safety plan
that is no more than 5 years old; (2) submission of supporting data
that demonstrates the need for the activity; (3) leveraging of private
or other public funding; or (4) the project is part of a comprehensive
approach to safety which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible safety planning activities include, but are
not limited to:
Collection, analysis, and improvement of safety data; and
Road safety assessments.
ii. Engineering Improvements (Funding Goal 30 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4) which can be
found at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for engineering improvements: (1) Inclusion of the
activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation safety plan
that is no more than 5 years old; (2) inclusion of the activity in a
completed road safety audit, engineering study, impact assessment or
other engineering document; (3) submission of supporting data that
demonstrates the need for the project; (4) ownership of the facility;
(5) leveraging of private or other public funding; (6) years since the
tribe has last received funding for an TTPSF engineering improvement
project; or (7) the project is part of a comprehensive approach to
safety which includes other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible engineering improvement projects include, but
are not limited to:
Intersection safety improvements;
Pavement and shoulder widening (including addition of a
passing lane to remedy an unsafe condition);
Installation of rumble strips or another warning device,
if the rumble strips or other warning devices do not adversely affect
the safety or mobility of bicyclists and pedestrians, including persons
with disabilities;
Installation of a skid-resistant surface at an
intersection or other location with a high frequency of crashes;
Improvements for pedestrian or bicyclist safety or safety
of persons with disabilities;
Construction and improvement of railway-highway grade
crossing safety feature;
Installation of protective devices;
Construction of a traffic calming feature;
Elimination of a roadside hazard;
Installation, replacement, and other improvement of
highway signage and pavement markings, or a project to maintain minimum
levels of retroreflectivity that addresses highway safety;
Installation of a traffic control or other warning device
at a location with high crash potential;
Installation of guardrails, barriers (including barriers
between construction work zones and traffic lanes for the safety of
road users and workers), and crash attenuators;
The addition or retrofitting of structures or other
measures to eliminate or reduce crashes involving vehicles and
wildlife;
Installation of yellow-green signs and signals at
pedestrian and bicycle crossings and in school zones;
Construction and operational improvements on high risk
rural roads;
Geometric improvements to a road for safety purposes that
improve safety;
Roadway safety infrastructure improvements consistent with
the recommendations included in the FHWA publication entitled ``Highway
Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians'';
Truck parking facilities eligible for funding under
section 1401 of MAP-21;
Systemic safety improvements; and
Transportation-related safety projects for modes such as
trails, docks, boardwalks, ice roads, and others that are eligible for
TTP funds.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services Improvements (Funding Goal 20
Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be
found at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for enforcement and emergency services improvements:
(1) Inclusion of the activity in a completed State SHSP or tribal
transportation safety plan that is no more than 5 years old; (2)
submission of supporting data that demonstrates the need for the
project; (3) leveraging of private or other public funding; or (4) the
project is part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes
other safety efforts.
Examples of eligible enforcement and emergency services improvement
activities include, but are not limited to:
The conduct of a model traffic enforcement activity at a
railway-highway crossing;
Installation of a priority control system for emergency
vehicles at signalized intersections; and
Planning integrated interoperable emergency communications
equipment, operational activities, or traffic enforcement activities
(including police assistance) relating to work zone safety.
iv. Education Programs (Funding Goal 10 Percent of TTPSF)
Example projects are listed in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4), which can be
found at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/title23usc.pdf.
The FHWA will use the following criteria in the evaluation of
funding requests for education projects: (1) Inclusion of the activity
in a completed State SHSP or tribal transportation
[[Page 36889]]
safety plan that is no more than 5 years old; (2) submission of
supporting data that demonstrates the need for the project; (3)
leveraging of private or other public funding; or (4) the project is
part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other safety
efforts.
Examples of eligible education activities include, but are not
limited to:
Safety Management System Implementation Plan activities;
Public service announcements; and
Programs implemented to inform the public or address
behaviors that affect transportation safety.
2. Review and Selection Process
The TTPSF grant applications will be evaluated in accordance with
evaluation process discussed below. The FHWA will establish an
evaluation team to review each application received by FHWA prior to
the application deadline. The FHWA will lead the evaluation team, which
will include members from the BIA. The evaluation team will include
technical and professional staff with relevant experience and expertise
in tribal transportation safety issues. The evaluation team will be
responsible for evaluating and rating all eligible projects. The
evaluation team will review each application against the evaluation
criteria in each of the four categories and assign a rating of ``Highly
Qualified,'' ``Qualified,'' or ``Not Qualified'' to each application
for the FHWA Administrator's review. The FHWA Administrator will
forward funding recommendations to the Office of the Secretary. The
final funding decisions will be made by the Secretary of
Transportation.
All applications will be evaluated and assigned a rating of
``Highly Qualified,'' ``Qualified,'' or ``Not Qualified.'' The ratings,
as defined below, are proposed within each priority funding category as
follows:
i. Safety Plans and Safety Planning Activities \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The development of a tribal safety plan is the cornerstone
for all future tribal safety activities including education,
enforcement and emergency services, engineering improvements and
other safety planning activities. Because of the importance of
developing, completing or updating a tribal safety plan and for this
one category only, applications will be deemed either ``highly
qualified'' or ``not qualified.'' All applications to develop a new
tribal safety plan, update an incomplete safety plan, or update an
existing tribal safety plan more than 3 years old are deemed to be
highly qualified. Applications not directed to developing, updating
or completing existing a tribal safety plan or which address a plan
not older than 3 years are deemed ``Not Qualified.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Development of Tribal Safety Plans
a. Highly Qualified: Requests (up to a maximum of $12,500) for
development of new tribal safety plans or to update incomplete tribal
safety plans; and requests (up to a maximum of $7,500) to update
existing tribal safety plans that are more than 3 years old.
b. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; any request to update an existing tribal safety plan that
is less than 3 years old.
II. Other Safety Planning Activities
a. Highly Qualified: Requests for other safety planning activities
that are in a current State SHSP or tribal safety plan that is not more
than 5 years old; submission of data that demonstrates the need for the
activities; significant leveraging of private or public funding; and
are part of a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other
safety efforts. If the total amount of funding requested for
applications rated as ``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of
available funding, FHWA will give priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component must meet eligibility criteria and
must be a transportation safety project that has independent utility
(i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure of Federal funds even if
no other improvements are made in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready for its intended use upon
completion of that component.
Applicants should be aware that while it is anticipated that most
of these projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not
lead to construction or have potentially significant traffic or other
impacts, depending on the relationship between the overall project and
the independent component, the NEPA review for the independent
component may have to include evaluation of all project components as
connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR
1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given to funding requests
that include a commitment of other funding sources to complement the
TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity
to successfully implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Requests for other safety planning activities that
are in a current State SHSP or tribal safety plan that is more than 5
years old; submission of some data that demonstrates the need for the
activity; some leveraging of private or public funding; and is part of
a comprehensive approach to safety which includes other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review for the independent component may have to include evaluation of
all project components as connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as
detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given
to funding requests that include a commitment of other funding sources
to complement the TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed project
in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; projects that are not included in a State SHSP or tribal
safety plan.
ii. Engineering Improvements
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the project; project is in a current
road safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety engineering
study; projects located on a BIA or tribal facility; significant
leverage with other funding; the tribe has not received funding for a
TTPSF transportation safety construction project in more than 10 years
or the project is part of a comprehensive approach to safety which
includes three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount
[[Page 36890]]
of available funding, FHWA will give priority funding consideration to
funding one or more independent components of a highly qualified
project. To be eligible, a component must meet eligibility criteria and
must be a transportation improvement that has independent utility
(i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure of Federal funds even if
no other improvements are made in the area). In other words, FHWA may
fund an independent component of a project, instead of the full project
described in the application, only if that component provides
transportation benefits and will be ready for its intended use upon
completion of that component's construction. Applicants should be aware
that, depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan, but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; project is in a road
safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety engineering study that
is more than 5 years old; project is located on a transportation
facility not owned by a tribe or BIA; some leveraging with other
funding; the tribe has not received funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project in the last 2 to 10 years or the projects
is part of a coordinated approach with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation improvement that
has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable expenditure
of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in the area).
In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a project,
instead of the full project described in the application, only if that
component provides transportation benefits and will be ready for its
intended use upon completion of that component's construction.
Applicants should be aware that, depending on the relationship between
the overall project and the independent component, the NEPA review for
the independent component may have to include evaluation of all project
components as connected, similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at
40 CFR 1508.25. Priority consideration will also be given to funding
requests that include a commitment of other funding sources to
complement the TTPSF, and those requests where the applicants
demonstrate the capacity to successfully implement the proposed project
in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application to support the request; are not
included in a road safety audit, impact assessment, or other safety
engineering study; have received funding for a TTPSF transportation
safety construction project within the last 2 years or do not have a
comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
iii. Enforcement and Emergency Services
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the requested project; significant
leverage with other funding or are part of a comprehensive approach to
safety, including three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will
give priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety
project that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; some leveraging with
other funding or are coordinated with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application that supports the project;
[[Page 36891]]
does not have a comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
iv. Education Programs
a. Highly Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or
tribal safety plan that is less than 5 years old; data included in the
application that directly supports the requested project; significant
leverage with other funding or are part of a comprehensive approach to
safety including three or more other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``highly qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will
give priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a highly qualified project. To be eligible, a component
must meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety
project that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
b. Qualified: Efforts that are in a current State SHSP or tribal
safety plan but the plan is more than 5 years old; some data included
in the application that supports the project; some leveraging with
other funding or are coordinated with one to two other safety efforts.
If the total amount of funding requested for applications rated as
``qualified'' exceeds the amount of available funding, FHWA will give
priority funding consideration to funding one or more independent
components of a qualified project. To be eligible, a component must
meet eligibility criteria and must be a transportation safety project
that has independent utility (i.e., is usable and a reasonable
expenditure of Federal funds even if no other improvements are made in
the area). In other words, FHWA may fund an independent component of a
project, instead of the full project described in the application, only
if that component provides transportation benefits and will be ready
for its intended use upon completion of that component. Applicants
should be aware that while it is anticipated that most of these
projects will be categorical exclusions because they do not lead to
construction or have potentially significant traffic or other impacts,
depending on the relationship between the overall project and the
independent component, the NEPA review for the independent component
may have to include evaluation of all project components as connected,
similar, or cumulative actions, as detailed at 40 CFR 1508.25. Priority
consideration will also be given to funding requests that include a
commitment of other funding sources to complement the TTPSF, and those
requests where the applicants demonstrate the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed project in a timely manner.
c. Not Qualified: Projects that do not meet the eligibility
requirements; are not included in a State SHSP or tribal safety plan;
no data provided in the application that supports the project does not
have a comprehensive approach to safety with other partners.
F. Federal Award Administration Information
1. Federal Award Notice
The FHWA will announce the awarded projects by posting a list of
selected projects at http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/ttp/safety/.
Following the announcement, successful applicants and unsuccessful
applicants will be notified separately.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
All awards will be administered pursuant to the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards found in 2 CFR part 200. Applicable Federal laws,
rules, and regulations set forth in title 23, U.S.C., and title 23 of
the CFR, apply.
The TTPSF will be administered the same way as all TTP funds: FHWA
Agreement tribes will receive funds in accordance with their Program
Agreement through a RFA; BIA Agreement tribes will receive their funds
through their BIA Regional Office; and Compact tribes will receive
their funds through the Department of the Interior's Office of Self
Governance.
3. Reporting
Required reporting follows the requirements for regular TTP funds.
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
For further information concerning this notice please contact
Russell Garcia, TTPSF Program Manager, via email at
russell.garcia@dot.gov; by telephone at 202-366-9815; or by mail at
Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. For legal questions, please
contact Ms. Vivian Philbin, Office of the Chief Counsel, by telephone
at (720) 963-3445; by email at vivian.philbin@dot.gov; or by mail at
Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division,
12300 West Dakota Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80228. Office hours are from
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. m.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
H. Other Information
1. Protection of Confidential Business Information
All information submitted as part of or in support of any
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes
information you consider to be a trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information, the applicant should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover that the submission ``Contains
Confidential Business Information (CBI)''; (2) mark each affected page
``CBI,'' and (3) highlight or otherwise denote the CBI portions.
Authority: Section 1119 of Pub. L. 112-141; 23 U.S.C. 202(e).
Issued on: June 19, 2015.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-15709 Filed 6-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P