Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles: Use of Seat Belts |
|---|
|
T.F. Scott Darling, III
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
December 10, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76649-76653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30864]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 392
[Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0396]
RIN 2126-AB87
Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles: Use of Seat Belts
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA proposes to revise the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) by requiring that passengers in property-carrying
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) use the seat belt assembly whenever
the vehicles are operated on public roads. This rule would hold motor
carriers and drivers responsible for ensuring that passengers riding in
the CMV are also using the seat belts required by the Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs).
DATES: You may submit comments by January 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments to the rulemaking docket should refer to Docket ID
Number FMCSA-2015-0396 or RIN 2126-AB87 and be submitted to the
Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration using any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles A. Horan, Director; Carrier,
Driver, and Vehicle Safety Standards, Office of Policy, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001 or by telephone at (202) 366-5370FMCSA office hours are
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t. Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to
the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
II. Executive Summary
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
IV. Background
V. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
VI. Regulatory Analyses
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (FMCSA-2015-0396), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that FMCSA can contact you if there are questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
click on the ``Submit a Comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu, select
``Rules,'' insert ``FMCSA-2015-0396'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and click
``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Submit a Comment''
in the ``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
[[Page 76650]]
format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope.
FMCSA will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble, go to http://www.regulations.gov and click on the ``Read
Comments'' box in the upper right hand side of the screen. Then, in the
``Keyword'' box insert ``FMCSA-2015-0396'' and click ``Search.'' Next,
click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. Finally, in
the ``Title'' column, click on the document you would like to review.
If you do not have access to the Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
II. Executive Summary
Purpose and Summary of the Major Provisions
Section 393.93(b)(2)-(3) of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) (49 CFR 393.93) requires every truck and truck
tractor manufactured after the early 1970s to comply with the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) 208 (49 CFR 571.208), relating to the
installation of seat belt assemblies, as well as FMVSS 210, dealing
with the installation of seat belt assembly anchorages, and FMVSS 207,
addressing seating systems more generally. Under FMVSS 208, trucks and
multipurpose passenger vehicles with a GVWR of more than 10,000 pounds
manufactured on or after September 1, 1990, are allowed by S4.3.2.1 an
option to comply by providing a ``complete passenger protection
system,'' but nearly all CMV manufacturers choose the second compliance
option (S4.3.2.2) and install a ``belt system.'' This second option
requires a seat belt assembly ``at each designated seating position.''
In short, the FMVSS and FMCSRs require seat belts at every seating
position in a CMV. In addition, 49 CFR 392.16 requires that a property-
carrying CMV which has a seat belt assembly installed at the driver's
seat shall not be driven unless the driver has properly restrained
himself or herself with the seat belt assembly. FMCSA proposes to
require that passengers riding in property-carrying CMVs also use their
seat belts when the vehicle is operated on public roads.
Benefits and Costs
As indicated above, NHTSA requires vehicle manufacturers to install
driver and passenger seat belts in large trucks. FMCSA already requires
drivers to use their seat belts. However, the FMCSRs are silent on the
use of seat belts by passengers. This NPRM would require every
passenger to use a seat belt, if one was installed. The cost would be
the value of the person's time necessary to buckle the safety belt,
which is negligible. The benefits of this rule would be any fatalities
or injuries avoided as a result of seat belt use; these benefits are
discussed later.
III. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This NPRM is based on the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (1935 Act) and
the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (1984 Act). The 1935 Act (49
U.S.C. 31502), authorizes FMCSA to prescribe requirements for the
safety of operation and equipment standards of for-hire and private
motor carriers. This NPRM is directly related to safe motor carrier
operations. The 1984 Act (49 U.S.C. 31136) required FMCSA to adopt
regulations to ensure, among other things, that ``commercial motor
vehicles are maintained, equipped, loaded, and operated safely'' (Sec.
31136(a)(1)). This proposal would increase the safety, not only of
passengers, but also of CMV drivers whose control of the vehicle would
not be affected by unsecured passengers potentially thrown about the
cab as a result of emergency steering or braking maneuvers. A 2012
amendment to the 1984 Act requires FMCSA to ensure that CMV drivers are
not coerced to violate certain provisions of the FMCSRs (Sec.
31136(a)(5)). Given the obvious value of this proposal, and the ease of
compliance, the Agency believes that no one will be coerced not to wear
a seat belt. It should be noted that the 1985 Act also authorizes FMCSA
to ``perform any other acts [the Agency] considers appropriate'' (49
U.S.C. 31133(a)(1)), which clearly covers this common sense NPRM.
IV. Background
This rulemaking responds to a petition submitted by the Commercial
Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) on October 29, 2013 (available in the
docket to this rulemaking). CVSA requested that FMCSA require all
occupants in a property-carrying CMV to restrain themselves when it is
being driven. The petition referred to data available from the Agency's
Report to Congress on the Large Truck Crash Causation Study (available
at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/research-and-analysis/research/large-truck-crash-causation-study).
V. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
Under this proposal the requirements of 49 CFR 392.16 would be
revised to include requirements for seat belt usage by passengers in
property-carrying CMVs. FMCSA proposes to revise the FMCSRs to prohibit
the driving of a property-carrying CMV unless the driver and all other
occupants have fastened their seat belts, if the vehicle is equipped
with such belts.
Today's proposal responds to CVSA's petition, but has slightly
modified some of the petitioner's requests. FMCSA has used the word
``occupant'' in addition to ``passenger'' to make clear that the
regulation would apply to any person in the property-carrying CMV.
``Occupants'' would include instructors, evaluators, or any other
personnel who might be seated in a property-carrying CMV, regardless of
their status. FMCSA also proposes this requirement be applicable only
if there is a seat belt assembly installed in the property-carrying
CMV.
FMCSA recognizes that section 392.60 prohibits the use of a CMV to
transport unauthorized passengers. Nevertheless, we believe today's
rule fills an important safety gap by requiring the use of safety belts
when the passenger seat is used by team drivers or other authorized
individuals.
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) and DOT policies and
procedures, FMCSA must determine
[[Page 76651]]
whether a regulatory action is ``significant,'' and therefore subject
to OMB review and the requirements of the E.O. The Order defines
``significant regulatory action'' as one likely to result in a rule
that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal government or communities.
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency.
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof.
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the E.O.
FMCSA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of E.O. 12866 or significant
within the meaning of Department of Transportation regulatory policies
and procedures. The proposals contained in this document would not
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, lead
to a major increase in costs or prices, or have significant adverse
effects on the United States economy.
According to data from NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System,
available in the docket for this rulemaking, in 2013, 348 non-driver
occupants were in the truck at the time the vehicle was involved in a
fatal crash and were wearing a lap or shoulder belt. Seventeen of those
non-driver occupants were killed in the crash. Also in 2013, 122 non-
driver occupants of large trucks were involved in fatal crashes and
were not wearing a lap and or shoulder belt; of these, 30 were killed.
Sixteen of the 30 were totally or partially ejected from the truck. The
fatality rate was thus far lower among passengers who wore seat belts.
FMCSA believes that some of these fatalities could have been prevented
if this regulation had been in place.
While all States but one have seat belt laws, failure to use a belt
may be either a primary of secondary offense and may not apply to a
truck passenger; furthermore, there may be differences in the weight
threshold at which the law applies. Therefore, adopting a Federal rule
applicable to non-driver occupants of CMVs, as defined in 49 CFR 390.5,
will provide a uniform national standard. To maintain eligibility for
Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program grants, States would be
required to adopt compatible seat belt rules for non-driver occupants
within 3 years of FMCSA's publication of a final rule.
Admittedly, FMCSA does not know how many trucks carry passengers,
or how many of those passengers fail to use existing seat belts.
However, given that the only cost of the proposal is the negligible
amount of time needed for occupants to buckle their seat belts, the
rule would obviously benefit motor carrier employees and passengers.
Seat belts have been proven to save lives, and while the specific
number of CMV-related fatalities that could be avoided is unclear,
FMCSA believes motor carriers' and drivers' compliance with a final
rule requiring the use of seat belts by non-driver occupants would save
lives.
The Agency believes the potential economic of this NPRM impact is
positive, because it is likely that some lives will be saved at a cost
that would not begin to approach the $100 million annual threshold for
economic significance. Moreover, the Agency does not expect the rule to
generate substantial congressional or public interest. This proposed
rule therefore has not been formally reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of the regulatory
action on small business and other small entities and to minimize any
significant economic impact. The term ``small entities'' comprises
small businesses and not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
Accordingly, DOT policy requires an analysis of the impact of all
regulations on small entities and mandates that agencies strive to
lessen any adverse effects on these businesses.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Title II, Pub. L.
104-121, 110 Stat. 857, March 29, 1996), FMCSA does not expect the
proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. FMCSA believes the cost is minimal and poses
no disproportionate burden to small entities.
Consequently, I certify that the proposed action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
FMCSA invites comment from members of the public who believe there will
be a significant impact either on small businesses or on governmental
jurisdictions with a population of less than 50,000.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, FMCSA wants to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking initiative. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please consult the FMCSA point of
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of the
proposed rule.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business Administration's Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of FMCSA, call
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). DOT has a policy ensuring the rights
of small entities to regulatory enforcement fairness and an explicit
policy against retaliation for exercising these rights.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded Federal mandate, as
defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532 et
seq.), that would result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $155
million (which is the value of $100 million in 1995 after adjusting for
inflation to 2014) or more in any 1 year.
D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
E. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FMCSA analyzed this action under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health
[[Page 76652]]
Risks and Safety Risks. The Agency determined that this proposed rule
will not create an environmental risk to health or safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FMCSA reviewed this notice of proposed rulemaking in accordance
with Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights, and has determined it will
not affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking
implications.
G. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has Federalism implications if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law
or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on the States. FMCSA
has analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13132 and
determined that it does not have Federalism implications.
H. Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this program.
I. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments)
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under E.O.
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulations. No new information collection requirements are associated
with this NPRM.
K. National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Air Act
FMCSA analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
determined under our environmental procedures Order 5610.1 (69 FR 9680,
March 1, 2004) that this action does not have any effect on the quality
of the environment. Therefore, this NPRM is categorically excluded (CE)
from further analysis and documentation in an environmental assessment
or environmental impact statement under FMCSA Order 5610.1, paragraph
6(bb) of Appendix 2. The CE under paragraph 6(b) addresses regulations
concerning vehicle operation safety standards. A Categorical Exclusion
Determination is available for inspection or copying in the
Regulations.gov Web site listed under ADDRESSES.
FMCSA also analyzed this proposed rule under the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), and
implementing regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection
Agency. Approval of this action is exempt from the CAA's general
conformity requirement since it does not affect direct or indirect
emissions of criteria pollutants.
L. Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Under E.O. 12898, each Federal agency must identify and address, as
appropriate, ``disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on
minority populations and low-income populations'' in the United States,
its possessions, and territories. FMCSA evaluated the environmental
justice effects of this proposed rule in accordance with the E.O., and
has determined that no environmental justice issue is associated with
this proposed rule, nor is there any collective environmental impact
that would result from its promulgation.
M. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. FMCSA has determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that executive order because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, the rule does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
N. E-Government Act of 2002
The E-Government Act of 2002, Public Law 107-347, Sec. 208, 116
Stat. 2899, 2921 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires Federal agencies to conduct
a privacy impact assessment for new or substantially changed technology
that collects, maintains, or disseminates information in an
identifiable form. FMCSA has not completed an assessment of the
handling of PII in connection with today's proposal because the NPRM
does not involve PII.
O. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272
note) requires Federal agencies proposing to adopt technical standards
to consider whether voluntary consensus standards are available. If the
Agency chooses to adopt its own standards in place of existing
voluntary consensus standards, it must explain its decision in a
separate statement to OMB. Because FMCSA does not intend to adopt its
own technical standards, there is no need to submit a separate
statement to OMB on this matter.
P. Privacy Impact Assessment
Section 522 of title I of division H of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2005, enacted December 8, 2004 (Pub. L. 108-447,
118 Stat. 2809, 3268, 5 U.S.C. 552a note), requires the Agency to
conduct a privacy impact assessment of a regulation that will affect
the privacy of individuals. This rule would not require the collection
of any personally identifiable information.
The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) applies only to Federal agencies
and any non-Federal agency that receives records contained in a system
of records from a Federal agency for use in a matching program. This
proposed rule would not result in a new or revised Privacy Act System
of Records for FMCSA.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 392
Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Highway safety, Motor carriers.
PART 392--DRIVING OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES
0
1. The authority citation for part 392 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 13902, 31136, 31151, 31502; Section
112 of Pub. L. 103- 311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1676 (1994), as amended by
sec. 32509 of Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 805 (2012); and 49 CFR
1.87.
0
2. Revise Sec. 392.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 392.16 Use of Seat Belts.
(a) Drivers. No driver shall operate a property-carrying commercial
motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver
to operate a
[[Page 76653]]
property-carrying commercial motor vehicle, which has a seat belt
assembly installed at the driver's seat unless the driver is properly
restrained by the seat belt assembly.
(b) Passengers. No driver shall operate a property-carrying
commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or
permit a driver to operate a property-carrying commercial motor
vehicle, which has seat belt assemblies installed at the seats for
other occupants of the vehicle unless all other occupants are properly
restrained by such seat belt assemblies.
Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.87 on:
December 2, 2015.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-30864 Filed 12-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P