|
Christopher Grundler
Environmental Protection Agency
9 August 2016
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52678-52680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18897]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[AMS-FRL-9950-45-OAR]
California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards;
Amendments to On-Highway Heavy-Duty Vehicle In-Use Compliance Program,
Amendments to 2007 and Subsequent Model Year On-Highway Heavy-Duty
Engines and Vehicles, and Amendments to Truck Requirements; Request for
Waiver of Preemption; Opportunity for Public Hearing and Public Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has notified EPA
that it has adopted a series of amendments to its on-highway heavy-duty
vehicle and engine regulations. The amendments to CARB's in-use
compliance program align CARB's program with EPA's program in terms of
measurement allowances during on-road testing (In-Use Amendments). The
amendments to CARB's 2007 and subsequent model year (MY) regulation
(2007 Amendments) are minor technical amendments regarding mathematical
expression of emission results and certain compliance flexibilities.
The amendments to CARB's truck idling requirements (Truck Idling
Amendments) clarify that certain vehicles are exempt from the new
vehicle requirements. By letter dated January 27, 2016, CARB submitted
a
[[Page 52679]]
request that EPA grant a full waiver of preemption under section 209(b)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7543(b) for the In-Use
Amendments. CARB separately seeks EPA's confirmation that the 2007
Amendments and the Truck Idling Amendments are within the scope of
prior EPA waiver decisions. This notice announces that EPA has
scheduled a public hearing concerning California's request and that EPA
is accepting written comment on the request.
DATES: EPA has tentatively scheduled a public hearing concerning CARB's
request on September 28, 2016, at 10 a.m. EPA will hold a hearing only
if any party notifies EPA by September 21, 2016 to express interest in
presenting the Agency with oral testimony. Parties wishing to present
oral testimony at the public hearing should provide written notice to
David Dickinson at the email address noted below. If EPA receives a
request for a public hearing, that hearing will be held at the William
Jefferson Clinton Building (North), Room 5528 at 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460. If EPA does not receive a request for a
public hearing, then EPA will not hold a hearing, and instead will
consider CARB's request based on written submissions to the docket. Any
party may submit written comments until November 1, 2016.
Any person who wishes to know whether a hearing will be held may
call David Dickinson at (202) 343-9256 on or after September 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA will make available for in person inspection, at the Air
and Radiation Docket and Information Center, written comments received
from interested parties, in addition to any testimony given at the
public hearing. The official public docket is the collection of
materials that is available for public viewing at the Air and Radiation
Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket is (202) 566-1743. The reference number for this
docket is EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
EPA will make available an electronic copy of this Notice on the
Office of Transportation and Air Quality's (OTAQ's) homepage (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/). Users can find this document by accessing the OTAQ
homepage and looking at the path entitled ``Regulations.'' This service
is free of charge, except any cost you already incur for Internet
connectivity. Users can also get the official Federal Register version
of the Notice on the day of publication on the primary Web site:
(http://www.epa.gov/docs/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/).
Please note that due to differences between the software used to
develop the documents and the software into which the documents may be
downloaded, changes in format, page length, etc., may occur.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson (6405J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 343-9256, Fax: (202) 343-2804,
email address: Dickinson.David@EPA.GOV.
For Obtaining and Submitting Electronic Copies of Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-
0017, by one of the following methods:
http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: dickinson.david@epa.gov
Fax: (202) 343-2804.
Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West (Air
Docket), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Room B108, Mail Code 6102T,
Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
Please include a total of two copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0017.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or
email.
The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(A) CARB's Waiver Request and Within-the-Scope Request
CARB's January 27, 2016, letter to the Administrator presents EPA
with CARB's series of amendments related to the control of emissions
from California on-road medium- and heavy-duty engines and vehicles.
The In-Use Amendments include amendments adopted by CARB in 2011 that
allow a measurement allowance of 0.006 grams per brake horsepower-hour
(g/bhp-hr) when using portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) for
on-road in-use testing of heavy-duty vehicles. The 2007 Amendments are
minor technical amendments regarding mathematical expression of
emission results and certain compliance flexibilities. These amendments
specify the NOx emission standards to the correct number of significant
digits (e.g. 0.2 g/bhp-hr is now expressed as 0.20 g/bhp-hr for NOx).
The 2007 Amendments also make corrections to the formaldehyde standards
for medium-duty diesel vehicles, harmonize labeling requirements with
EPA's requirements, maintain consistency with deterioration factors
between CARB and EPA, and provide manufacturers with certain compliance
flexibilities for the 2007 through 2009 model years. The Truck Idling
Amendments clarify that new
[[Page 52680]]
engine provisions do not apply to armored cars and workover rigs.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A further description of the CARB amendments can be found in
CARB's Waiver Support document in docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Scope of Preemption and Criteria for a Waiver Under the Clean Air
Act
Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (``Act''), 42
U.S.C. 7543(a), provides:
No state or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or
attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines subject to this
part. No state shall require certification, inspection or any other
approval relating to the control of emissions from any new motor
vehicle or new motor vehicle engine as condition precedent to the
initial retail sale, titling (if any), or registration of such motor
vehicle, motor vehicle engine, or equipment.
Section 209(b) of the Act requires the Administrator, after notice
and opportunity for public hearing, to waive application of the
prohibitions of section 209(a) for any state that has adopted standards
(other than crankcase emission standards) for the control of emissions
from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines prior to March 30,
1966, if the state determines that the state standards will be, in the
aggregate, at least as protective of public health and welfare as
applicable federal standards. California is the only state that is
qualified to seek and receive a waiver under section 209(b). EPA must
grant a waiver unless the Administrator finds that (A) the
determination of the state is arbitrary and capricious, (B) the state
does not need the state standards to meet compelling and extraordinary
conditions, or (C) the state standards and accompanying enforcement
procedures are not consistent with section 202(a) of the Act. Previous
decisions granting waivers of federal preemption for motor vehicles
have maintained that state standards are inconsistent with section
202(a) if there is inadequate lead time to permit the development of
the necessary technology giving appropriate consideration to the cost
of compliance within that time period or if the federal and state test
procedures impose inconsistent certification procedures.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ To be consistent, the California certification procedures
need not be identical to the federal certification procedures.
California procedures would be inconsistent, however, if
manufacturers would be unable to meet the state and the federal
requirements with the same test vehicle in the course of the same
test. See, e.g., 43 FR 32182 (July 25, 1978).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If California amends regulations that were previously granted a
waiver, EPA can confirm that the amended regulations are within the
scope of the previously granted waiver. Such within-the-scope
amendments are permissible without a full waiver review if three
conditions are met. First, the amended regulations must not undermine
California's determination that its standards, in the aggregate, are as
protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal
standards. Second, the amended regulations must not affect consistency
with section 202(a) of the Act. Third, the amended regulations must not
raise any ``new issues'' affecting EPA's prior waivers.
(C) Request for Comment
First, EPA requests comment on whether the 2007 Amendments and the
Truck Idling Amendments, each individually assessed, should be
considered under the within-the-scope analysis or whether they should
be considered under the full waiver criteria. Specifically, we request
comment on whether the 2007 Amendments and the Truck Idling Amendments
(1) undermine California's previous determination that its standards,
in the aggregate, are at least as protective of public health and
welfare as comparable Federal standards, (2) affect the consistency of
California's requirements with section 202(a) of the Act, and (3) raise
any other ``new issue'' affecting EPA's previous waiver or
authorization determinations.
For the In-Use Amendments and to the extent commenters believe the
2007 Amendments or the Truck Idling Amendments should be considered
under the full waiver criteria, EPA invites comment under the following
three criteria: Whether (a) California's determination that its motor
vehicle emission standards are, in the aggregate, at least as
protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal standards
is arbitrary and capricious, (b) California needs such standards to
meet compelling and extraordinary conditions, and (c) California's
standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are consistent with
section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.
Procedures for Public Participation
The Agency will make a verbatim record of the proceedings.
Interested parties may arrange with the reporter at the hearing to
obtain a copy of the transcript at their own expense. EPA will keep the
record open until November 1, 2016. Upon expiration of the comment
period, the Administrator will render a decision on CARB's request
based on the record of the public hearing, relevant written
submissions, and other information that she deems pertinent.
Persons with comments containing proprietary information must
distinguish such information from other comments to the greatest
possible extent and label it as ``Confidential Business Information''
(CBI). If a person making comments wants EPA to base its decision in
part on a submission labeled CBI, then a non-confidential version of
the document that summarizes the key data or information should be
submitted for the public docket. To ensure that proprietary information
is not inadvertently placed in the docket, submissions containing such
information should be sent directly to the contact person listed above
and not to the public docket. Information covered by a claim of
confidentiality will be disclosed by EPA only to the extent allowed and
by the procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. If no claim of
confidentiality accompanies the submission when EPA receives it, EPA
will make it available to the public without further notice to the
person making comments.
Dated: August 4, 2016.
Christopher Grundler, Director,
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-18897 Filed 8-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P