|
Christopher Grundler
Environmental Protection Agency
9 August 2016
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52684-52686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18873]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0224; FRL-9950-43-OAR]
California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards;
Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for Off-Highway
Recreational Vehicles (OHRVs); Request for Authorization; Opportunity
for Public Hearing and Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public hearing and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has notified EPA
that it has adopted amendments to its off-highway recreational vehicles
(ORVR) regulation that establish new evaporative emission standards and
associated test procedures for 2018 and subsequent model year OHRVs
(OHRV Evaporative Emission Amendments). By letter dated February 26,
2016, CARB asked that EPA authorize these amendments pursuant to
section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act. This notice announces that EPA has
tentatively scheduled a public hearing to consider California's
authorization request and that EPA is now accepting written comment on
the request.
DATES: EPA has tentatively scheduled a public hearing concerning CARB's
request on September 28, 2016. at 10 a.m. EPA will hold a hearing only
if any party notifies EPA by September 21, 2016 to express interest in
presenting the Agency with oral testimony. Parties wishing to present
oral testimony at the public hearing should provide written notice to
David Dickinson at the email address noted below. If EPA receives a
request for a public hearing, that hearing will be held at the William
Jefferson Clinton Building (North), Room 5528 at 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460. If EPA does not receive a request for a
public hearing, then EPA will not hold a hearing, and instead will
consider CARB's request based on written submissions to the docket. Any
party may submit written comments until November 1, 2016.
Any person who wishes to know whether a hearing will be held may
call David Dickinson at (202) 343-9256 on or after September 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0181, by one of the following methods:
Online at: http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the Online
Instructions for Submitting Comments.
Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-9744.
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2016-0181, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code: 6102T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total
of two copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Online Instructions for Submitting Comments: Direct your comments
to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0181. EPA's policy is that all
comments we receive will be included in the public docket without
change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your
email address will automatically be captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
EPA will make available for public inspection materials submitted
by CARB, written comments received from any interested parties, and any
testimony given at the public hearing. Materials relevant to this
proceeding are contained in the Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, maintained in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0181.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and
Radiation Docket in the EPA Headquarters Library, EPA West Building,
Room 3334, located at 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
Public Reading Room is open to the public on all federal government
work days from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; generally, it is open Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744. The Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center's Web site is http://www.epa.gov/oar/docket.html.
The electronic mail (email) address for the Air and Radiation Docket
is: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov, the telephone number is (202) 566-1742, and
the fax number is (202) 566-9744. An electronic version of the public
docket is available through the federal government's electronic public
docket and comment system. You may access EPA dockets at http://www.regulations.gov. After opening the http://www.regulations.gov Web
site, enter, in the ``Enter Keyword or ID'' fill-in box to view
documents in the record. Although a part of the official docket, the
public docket does not include Confidential Business Information
(``CBI'') or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dickinson (6405J), Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 343-
9256. Fax: (202) 343-2804. Email: dickinson.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(A) CARB's Authorization Request for Its OHRV Evaporative Emission
Amendments
The California OHRV category encompasses a wide variety of
vehicles, including off-road motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs),
off-road sport and utility vehicles, sand cars, and golf carts. CARB's
OHRV Evaporative
[[Page 52685]]
Emission Amendments establish a new test procedure and evaporative
emission standard of 1.0 gram per day (g/day) of total organic gas
(TOG) for a 3-day diurnal period, which may be achieved utilizing the
available evaporative emissions technology currently used in the on-
road sector.
By letter dated February 26, 2016, CARB submitted a request to EPA
pursuant to section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for
authorization for the OHRV Evaporative Emission Amendments.
(B) Clean Air Act Nonroad Engine and Vehicle Authorizations
Section 209(e)(1) of the CAA prohibits states and local governments
from adopting or attempting to enforce any standard or requirement
relating to the control of emissions from certain types of new nonroad
vehicles or engines. The Act also preempts states from adopting and
enforcing standards and other requirements related to the control of
emissions from other types of new nonroad vehicles or engines as well
as non-new nonroad engines or vehicles. Section 209(e)(2), however,
requires the Administrator, after notice and opportunity for public
hearing, to authorize California to adopt and enforce standards and
other requirements relating to the control of emissions from such
preempted vehicles or engines if California determines that California
standards will be, in the aggregate, at least as protective of public
health and welfare as applicable Federal standards. However, EPA shall
not grant such authorization if it finds that (1) the determination of
California is arbitrary and capricious; (2) California does not need
such California standards to meet compelling and extraordinary
conditions; or (3) California standards and accompanying enforcement
procedures are not consistent with [CAA section 209]. In addition,
other states with air quality attainment plans may adopt and enforce
such regulations if the standards and the implementation and
enforcement procedures are identical to California's standards. On July
20, 1994, EPA promulgated a rule that sets forth, among other things,
regulations providing the criteria, as found in section 209(e)(2),
which EPA must consider before granting any California authorization
request for new nonroad engine or vehicle emission standards.\1\ EPA
revised these regulations in 1997.\2\ As stated in the preamble to the
1994 rule, EPA has historically interpreted the section
209(e)(2)(A)(iii) ``consistency'' inquiry to require, at minimum, that
California standards and enforcement procedures be consistent with
section 209(a), section 209(e)(1), and section 209(b)(1)(C) (as EPA has
interpreted that subsection in the context of section 209(b) motor
vehicle waivers).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 59 FR 36969 (July 20, 1994).
\2\ 62 FR 67733 (December 30, 1997). The applicable regulations,
now in 40 CFR part 1074, subpart B, Sec. 1074.105, provide:
(a) The Administrator will grant the authorization if California
determines that its standards will be, in the aggregate, at least as
protective of public health and welfare as otherwise applicable
federal standards.
(b) The authorization will not be granted if the Administrator
finds that any of the following are true:
(1) California's determination is arbitrary and capricious.
(2) California does not need such standards to meet compelling
and extraordinary conditions.
(3) The California standards and accompanying enforcement
procedures are not consistent with section 209 of the Act.
(c) In considering any request to authorize California to adopt
or enforce standards or other requirements relating to the control
of emissions from new nonroad spark-ignition engines smaller than 50
horsepower, the Administrator will give appropriate consideration to
safety factors (including the potential increased risk of burn or
fire) associated with compliance with the California standard.
\3\ 59 FR 36969 (July 20, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to be consistent with section 209(a), California's nonroad
standards and enforcement procedures must not apply to new motor
vehicles or new motor vehicle engines. To be consistent with section
209(e)(1), California's nonroad standards and enforcement procedures
must not attempt to regulate engine categories that are permanently
preempted from state regulation. To determine consistency with section
209(b)(1)(C), EPA typically reviews nonroad authorization requests
under the same ``consistency'' criteria that are applied to motor
vehicle waiver requests. Pursuant to section 209(b)(1)(C), the
Administrator shall not grant California a motor vehicle waiver if she
finds that California ``standards and accompanying enforcement
procedures are not consistent with [section 202(a)]'' of the Act.
Previous decisions granting waivers and authorizations have noted that
state standards and enforcement procedures are inconsistent with
section 202(a) if: (1) There is inadequate lead time to permit the
development of the necessary technology giving appropriate
consideration to the cost of compliance within that time, or (2) the
federal and state testing procedures impose inconsistent certification
requirements.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id. See also 78 FR 58090, 58092 (September 20, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In considering whether to grant authorizations for accompanying
enforcement procedures tied to standards for which an authorization has
already been granted, EPA addresses questions as to whether the
enforcement procedures undermine California's determination that its
standards are as protective of public health and welfare as applicable
federal standards, and whether the enforcement procedures are
consistent with section 202(a).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See CAA section 209(e)(2)(A)(i) and (iii), 42 U.S.C.
7543(e)(2)(A) (i) and (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) EPA's Request for Comments
EPA requests comment on whether the OHRV Evaporative Emission
Amendments meet the criteria for an authorization. Specifically, we
request comment on: (a) Whether CARB's determination that its
standards, in the aggregate, are at least as protective of public
health and welfare as applicable federal standards is arbitrary and
capricious; (b) whether California needs such standards to meet
compelling and extraordinary conditions; and (c) whether California's
standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are consistent with
section 209 of the Act.
Procedures for Public Participation
If a hearing is held, the Agency will make a verbatim record of the
proceedings. Interested parties may arrange with the reporter at the
hearing to obtain a copy of the transcript at their own expense.
Regardless of whether a public hearing is held, EPA will keep the
record open until November 1, 2016. Upon expiration of the comment
period, the Administrator will render a decision on CARB's request
based on the record from the public hearing, if any, all relevant
written submissions, and other information that she deems pertinent.
All information will be available for inspection at the EPA Air Docket
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0181.
Persons with comments containing proprietary information must
distinguish such information from other comments to the greatest extent
possible and label it as ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI).
If a person making comments wants EPA to base its decision on a
submission labeled as CBI, then a non-confidential version of the
document that summarizes the key data or information should be
submitted to the public docket. To ensure that proprietary information
is not
[[Page 52686]]
inadvertently placed in the public docket, submissions containing such
information should be sent directly to the contact person listed above
and not to the public docket. Information covered by a claim of
confidentiality will be disclosed by EPA only to the extent allowed,
and according to the procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. If no claim
of confidentiality accompanies the submission when EPA receives it, EPA
will make it available to the public without further notice to the
person making comments.
Dated: August 3, 2016.
Christopher Grundler,
Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-18873 Filed 8-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P