Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; New Prime, Inc. (Prime) |
|---|
Topics: Prime, Inc.
|
Larry W. Minor
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
20 December 2016
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92947-92949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30633]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 395
[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0420]
Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption;
New Prime, Inc. (Prime)
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that New Prime, Inc. (Prime) has applied for
an exemption from the requirement in 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) that a
commercial learner's permit (CLP) holder must be accompanied by a
commercial driver's license (CDL) holder with the proper CDL class and
endorsements seated in the front seat of the vehicle while the CLP
holder is operating a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) on public roads or
highways. Prime requests an exemption to allow CLP holders who have
successfully passed the CDL skills test to be able to drive a CMV
without having a CDL holder seated in the front seat beside them. Prime
states that the CDL holder would remain in the CMV at all times while
the CLP holder is driving, but not necessarily in the passenger seat.
Prime believes that the exemption, if granted, would promote greater
productivity and help individuals who have passed the CDL skills test
return to actively earning a living faster, while achieving a level of
safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety
provided by complying with the regulations. FMCSA requests public
comment on Prime's application for exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number FMCSA-2016-0420 by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. See the
Public Participation and Request for Comments section below for further
information.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
[[Page 92948]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, contact Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: 614-942-6477. Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2016-0420), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comments online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2016-0420'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant
to the application, including any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
Prime seeks an exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) that would allow
CLP holders who have successfully passed a CDL skills test and are thus
eligible to receive a CDL, to drive without having a CDL holder seated
beside them in the CMV. Prime indicates that the CDL holder will remain
in the CMV at all times while the CLP holder is driving--just not in
the front seat. At present, Prime's compliance with 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1)
delays the second phase of CMV training of its CLP holders who have
passed the CDL skills test.
Prime is one of the nation's largest transportation companies with
a fleet of more than 7,500 CMVs. Prime advises that 2,500 to 3,500 CLP
holders would operate under the terms of the exemption each year. The
exemption application states that Sec. 383.25(a)(1) creates undue
burdens on Prime and its CLP holders, while also contributing to the
unprecedented driver shortage that continues to plague the commercial
trucking industry. Presently, the constraints that Prime faces in
adhering to the requirements of 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) are exceptionally
cost-intensive. Prior to the implementation of this section of the
regulations, it was not uncommon for States to issue temporary CDLs to
CLP holders for the return trip to collect the CDL document from their
State of domicile. During that time, CDL holders were neither required
to log themselves ``on duty'' when supervising the CLP holder who had a
temporary CDL, nor were they required to remain in the passenger seat
of the CMV. Under that scenario, the productivity of the CMV, the
earnings capacity of the CDL and CLP holders, and the logistics of the
motor carrier's freight network all went undisturbed. Under the current
rule, however, carriers must staff two drivers in the cab of the
tractor to accomplish the on-duty work of one.
Prime contends that compliance with the CDL rule leaves it with
only two options. It can either: (1) Secure some mode of public
transportation to allow the CLP holder to collect his or her CDL
document before returning to Prime; or (2) the company can route the
driver to his or her State of domicile, often against the natural flow
of the freight network. Prime argues that securing public transit for
each of these CLP holders under Option 1 entails extreme cost burdens
to the company; and option 2 is no more beneficial because routing CLP
holders to their home States, commonly without reference to shipper
demand, introduces extreme cost inefficiencies.
Other reasons cited by Prime in support of the exemption request
include: (1) CDL issuing agencies across States may require many days,
if not weeks, to secure the CLP holder's licensure materials. CLP
holders suffer great financial hardship during this waiting period. As
commercial truck driving is already notorious for its high turnover
rates, requiring such protracted waiting periods will greatly augment
driver attrition levels. (2) A marked reduction of CLP holders'
functional driving skills: CLP holders who are sidelined for many days
or weeks will experience a material diminishment in their driving
skills, as continuous experiential exposure to commercial driving is
required to keep such skills suitably honed; and (3) The industry-wide
driver shortage is exacerbated by the current rule. Prospective drivers
who learn that they might have to wait several days and be
inefficiently routed baci to their home State for CDL licensure, are
less likely to enlist in the trucking profession.
The exemption sought would apply only to those Prime drivers who
have passed the CDL skills test and hold a valid CLP.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
Prime states that granting this exemption will result in a level of
safety that is equal to or greater than the level of safety without the
exemption. The practical result of the exemption is that a CLP holder
who has passed a CDL skills test would be able to drive without
complying with Sec. 383.25(a)(1) and begin immediate and productive
[[Page 92949]]
on-the-job operation of a CMV on a public road or highway. Anyone who
obtained training and took the CDL skills test near his or her home
could go directly to the licensing agency, collect the CDL, and begin
driving without onboard supervision. It is only when the new driver
completes the training and testing in another State that the trip back
to obtain the CDL from the State of residence becomes problematic.
Allowing CLP holders who have passed the skills test to function as a
team driver on the trip home enables these new operators to continue to
sharpen their driving skills under the mentoring and observation of a
more experienced driver--and they immediately earn an income.
FMCSA has granted an exemption similar to the Prime request on two
prior occasions. In the September 23, 2016, Federal Register, FMCSA
granted a similar exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) to CRST Expedited
(81 FR 65696). In the June 11, 2015, Federal Register, FMCSA also
granted this exemption to C.R. England, Inc. (80 FR 33329). Under the
terms and conditions of both of these exemptions, a CLP holder who has
documentation of passing the CDL skills test may drive a CMV for either
of these companies without being accompanied by a CDL holder in the
front seat of the vehicle. The Agency believed that both of these
requests for exemption would achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety achieved without
the exemption.
A copy of Prime's application for exemption is available for review
in the docket for this notice.
Issued on: December 15, 2016.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-30633 Filed 12-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P