Request for Comment on ``Federal Automated Vehicles Policy'' |
|---|
|
Nathaniel Beuse
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
23 September 2016
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65703-65705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22993]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0090]
Request for Comment on ``Federal Automated Vehicles Policy''
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and Request for Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA invites public comment on the document, ``Federal
Automated Vehicles Policy.'' This document is intended as a starting
point that provides needed initial guidance to industry, government,
and consumers. It will necessarily evolve over time, changing based on
public comment; the experience of the agency, manufacturers, suppliers,
consumers, and others; and/or further technological innovation. NHTSA
intends to revise and refine the document within one year, and
periodically thereafter, to reflect such public input, experience, and
innovation, and will address significant comments received in the next
revision of this document.
DATES: You should submit your comments early enough to ensure that
Docket Management receives them no later than November 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number above and be
submitted by one of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
Public Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form
of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or to
the street address listed above. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical issues: Mr. Frank
Barickman, Team Leader at NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center at
(937) 666-4511 or by email at av_info_nhtsa@dot.gov.
For legal issues: Mr. Steve Wood of NHTSA's Office of Chief
Counsel, at (202) 366-2992 or by email at steve.wood@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), under the U.S. Department of Transportation,
was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970, to carry out safety
programs under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of
1966 and the Highway Safety Act of 1966. NHTSA is responsible for
reducing deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes on our nation's roadways. This is accomplished by
conducting research, setting and enforcing safety performance standards
for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, generating and
disseminating comparative safety performance information to encourage
the production and purchase of advanced safety features, requiring the
calling and remedying of defective and noncompliant vehicles and
equipment, and by making grants to state and local governments to
enable them to conduct effective local highway safety programs. Prior
or in addition to issuing standards, NHTSA also issues guidance
regarding motor vehicle safety issues.
Over the past several decades, many important safety technologies
have become standard equipment through regulation and voluntary
industry action, and tremendous adjustments in consumer behavior about
safety have been made through behavioral safety programs and the
promotion of these programs by safety partners. Despite these efforts
and the hundreds of thousands of lives saved attributable to these
efforts, crashes still happen, and people are still injured and killed.
35,092 people died on U.S. roadways in 2015. Moreover, NHTSA's data
suggest that 94% of crashes can be tied to a human choice or
behavior.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Singh, S. (2015, February). Critical reasons for crashes
investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey.
(Traffic Safety Facts Crash Stats. Report No. DOT HS 812 115).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 65704]]
Technologies that can help drivers avoid crashes, or help vehicles
themselves avoid crashes, are ushering in a new era of safety for the
motoring public. As vehicle technologies take on more and more of the
driving task--i.e., as vehicle automation progresses, enabled by radar,
camera, sensors, and communications technologies, along with highly
sophisticated computer systems and software to interpret and use the
data obtained by the vehicle--these innovations are expected to begin
to address and mitigate that overwhelming majority of crashes due to
human choices or behavior.
The term ``vehicle automation'' today refers to a spectrum of
technologies, which can be grouped broadly into several levels. Some
levels will only provide crash warnings to human drivers, or brake the
vehicle automatically if the human driver fails to brake soon enough or
hard enough, while higher levels will combine these abilities to create
driver-assistance systems to reduce the demand of driving. At the very
highest levels, the automated system itself (and not the human) may
function as the ``driver'' of the vehicle. At each level, the safety
potential grows as does the opportunity to improve mobility, reduce
energy consumption and improve the livability of cities. To realize
these tremendous benefits, NHTSA believes it should encourage the
adoption of these technologies and support their safe introduction. At
the same time, the remarkable speed with which increasingly complex
technologies are evolving challenges NHTSA to use its full complement
of tools to support the safe introduction of these technologies, so
that they can provide the promised safety benefits today, and achieve
their full safety potential in the future. To meet this challenge,
NHTSA must continue to build its expertise and knowledge to keep pace
with developments, expand its regulatory capability, and increase its
speed of execution.
After considerable input from a wide range of stakeholders, NHTSA
has developed a new document titled ``Federal Automated Vehicles
Policy.'' NHTSA is issuing this document as Agency guidance rather than
in a rulemaking in order to speed the delivery of an initial regulatory
framework and best practices to guide manufacturers and other entities
in the safe design, development, testing, and deployment of highly
automated vehicles (HAVs) and also to ensure that premature, static
regulatory requirements do not hinder innovation and diffusion of the
dynamic technologies that are being developed in the industry. The
document is available at www.nhtsa.gov/AV (or at http://www.nhtsa.gov
(search ``AV Policy'')), and also at http://www.regulations.gov (search
Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0090). In the following pages, we divide the task
of facilitating the safe introduction and deployment of HAVs into four
sections: (1) Vehicle Performance Guidance for Highly Automated
Vehicles; (2) Model State Policy; (3) NHTSA's Current Regulatory Tools;
and (4) New Tools and Authorities.
Vehicle Performance Guidance for Highly Automated Vehicles
The Vehicle Performance Guidance for Highly Automated Vehicles
section outlines best practices for the safe pre-deployment design,
development and testing of HAVs prior to commercial sale or operation
on public roads. This Guidance defines ``deployment'' as the operation
of an HAV by members of the public who are not the employees or agents
of the designer, developer, or manufacturer of that HAV.
This Guidance is intended to be an initial step to guide the safe
designing, testing and deployment of HAVs. It sets DOT's expectations
of industry by providing reasonable practices and procedures that
manufacturers, suppliers, and other entities should follow in the
immediate short term to design, test and deploy HAVs. The data
generated from these activities should be shared in a way that allows
government, industry, and the public to increase their learning and
understanding as technology evolves but protects legitimate privacy and
competitive interests.
Model State Policy
The Model State Policy confirms that States retain their
traditional responsibilities for vehicle licensing and registration,
traffic laws and enforcement, and motor vehicle insurance and liability
regimes while outlining the Federal role for HAVs. Today, a motorist
generally can drive across state lines without a worry more complicated
than, ``did the speed limit change?'' The integration of HAVs should
not change that ability. Similarly, a manufacturer should be able to
focus on developing a single HAV fleet that can be sold and used in all
states. State governments play an important role in facilitating HAVs,
ensuring they are safely deployed, and promoting their life-saving
benefits. Since 2014, DOT has partnered with the American Association
of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) to explore HAV policies. This
collaboration was one of the bases for the Model State Policy framework
presented here and identifies where new issues fit within the existing
federal/state structure. The shared objective is to ensure the
establishment of a consistent national framework that allows for
different policies and approaches across States, while avoiding a
patchwork of incompatible laws.
NHTSA's Current Regulatory Tools
NHTSA will continue to exercise its available regulatory authority
over HAVs using its existing regulatory tools, including
interpretations, exemptions, notice-and-comment rulemaking, and defects
and enforcement authority. NHTSA has broad authority to identify safety
defects, allowing the Agency to recall vehicles or equipment that pose
an unreasonable risk to safety even when there is no applicable Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS).
To aid regulated entities and the public in understanding and using
these tools (including for purposes related to the introduction of new
HAVs), NHTSA has prepared a new information and guidance document,
contained in Section III of the HAV Policy. This document provides
instructions, practical guidance, and assistance to entities seeking to
employ those tools. Furthermore, NHTSA has streamlined its review
process and is committing to issuing simple HAV-related interpretations
in 60 days, and ruling on simple HAV-related exemption requests in six
months.
NHTSA advises interested persons that, unlike the other sections of
the HAV Policy, Section III is intended to have wider application
outside the automated vehicles context. Persons interested in NHTSA's
general practices and procedures for interpretations, exemptions,
rulemaking, and reconsideration petitions may wish to review Section
III and determine whether they wish to submit comments.
New Tools and Authorities
The more effective use of NHTSA's existing regulatory tools will
help to expedite the safe introduction and regulation of new HAVs.
However, in part because today's governing statutes and regulations
were developed when HAVs were only a remote notion, those tools alone
may be insufficient to ensure that HAVs are introduced safely, and to
realize the full safety promise of new technologies. The speed at which
HAVs are advancing, combined with the
[[Page 65705]]
complexity and novelty of these innovations, will challenge the
Agency's conventional regulatory processes and capabilities. This
challenge requires NHTSA to examine whether the ways in which NHTSA has
addressed safety for the last several decades should be expanded to
realize the safety potential of HAVs over the decades to come.
Therefore, Section IV of the HAV Policy identifies potential new
tools, authorities, and regulatory approaches that could aid the safe
deployment of new technologies by enabling the Agency to be more nimble
and flexible. There will always be an important role for standards and
testing protocols based on careful scientific research and developed
through the give-and-take of an open public process. However, it is
likely that additional regulatory tools along with new expertise and
research also will be needed to allow the Agency to more quickly
address safety challenges and speed the deployment of lifesaving
technology.
Public Comment
Although most of this policy is effective immediately upon
publication, NHTSA is seeking public comment on the entire document.
While the Agency sought input from various stakeholders during the
development of the document, it recognizes that not all interested
persons had a full opportunity to provide such input. Formal comments
will allow for that opportunity.
Similarly, some of the items in the vehicle performance guidance
are subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, which
requires that the Agency provide separate notice and comment. The
notice for those items will be published shortly at http://www.regulations.gov (search Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0091). Finally, NHTSA
expects to hold public meetings and workshops associated with specific
items in this Policy. Once the timing of those meetings has been
finalized, Federal Register notices for those meetings will also be
published.
While the Policy is intended as a starting point that provides
needed initial guidance to industry, government, and consumers, it will
necessarily evolve over time to meet the changing needs and demands of
improved safety and technology. Accordingly, NHTSA expects and intends
the policy document and its guidance to be iterative, changing based on
public comment; the experience of the agency, manufacturers, suppliers,
consumers, and others; and further technological innovation. NHTSA
intends to revise and refine the document regularly to reflect such
experience, innovation, and public input.
Public Participation
How do I prepare and submit comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are filed correctly in the docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long (49 CFR 553.21).
NHTSA established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Please submit one copy (two copies if submitting by mail or hand
delivery) of your comments, including the attachments, to the docket
following the instructions given above under ADDRESSES. Please note, if
you are submitting comments electronically as a PDF (Adobe) file, we
ask that the documents submitted be scanned using an Optical Character
Recognition (OCR) process, thus allowing the agency to search and copy
certain portions of your submissions.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Office of the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the
address given above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition,
you may submit a copy (two copies if submitting by mail or hand
delivery), from which you have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to the docket by one of the methods given above
under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed
to be confidential business information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information specified in NHTSA's confidential
business information regulation (49 CFR part 512).
Will the agency consider late comments?
NHTSA will consider all comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To
the extent possible, the agency will also consider comments received
after that date. Given that we intend for the policy document to be a
living document and to be developed in an iterative fashion, subsequent
opportunities to comment will also be provided periodically.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received at the address given above under
COMMENTS. The hours of the docket are indicated above in the same
location. You may also see the comments on the Internet, identified by
the docket number at the heading of this notice, at http://www.regulations.gov.
Please note that, even after the comment closing date, NHTSA will
continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
the agency recommends that you periodically check the docket for new
material.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 20, 2016 under authority
delegated in 49 CFR part 1.95.
Nathaniel Beuse,
Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety Research.
[FR Doc. 2016-22993 Filed 9-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P