Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee |
|---|
|
V. Anne Heard
Environmental Protection Agency
1 May 2017
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 82 (Monday, May 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20260-20262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08646]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615; FRL-9961-48-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; TN: Non-Interference Demonstration for Federal
Low-Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement in Middle Tennessee
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
State of Tennessee's November 21, 2016, revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted through the Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), in support of the State's
request that EPA change the federal Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)
requirements for Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson
Counties (hereinafter referred to as the ``Middle Tennessee Area'' or
``Area''). Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP submittal revises its
maintenance plan for the Middle Tennessee Area for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates
that relaxing the federal RVP requirements in this Area would not
interfere with the Area's ability to meet the requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act). Specifically, Tennessee's SIP revision concludes
that relaxing the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 pounds per square
inch (psi) to 9.0 psi for gasoline sold between June 1 and September 15
of each year in the Area would not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or with any other CAA requirement. EPA has
determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision is
consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective May 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0615. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Mr. Akers can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9089 or
via electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What is the background for this final action?
On November 21, 2016, Tennessee submitted a SIP revision consisting
of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area. In a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) published on February 24, 2017 (82
FR 11517), EPA proposed to approve the State's noninterference
demonstration and the updates to updated emissions inventory and
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. The details of
Tennessee's submittal and the rationale for EPA's actions are explained
in the NPR. EPA did not receive any adverse comments on the proposed
action.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving Tennessee's November 21, 2016, SIP revision
consisting of a revision to its 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Middle Tennessee Area and the technical
noninterference demonstration supporting the State's request to change
the federal RVP requirements from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi in the Area.
Specifically, EPA is finalizing updated emissions inventory and
projections associated with the mobile source modeling used in the
State's noninterference demonstration related to RVP. EPA has
determined that the change in the RVP requirements for Davidson,
Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties will
[[Page 20261]]
not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any NAAQS or with any
other applicable requirement of the CAA.
EPA has determined that Tennessee's November 21, 2016, RVP-related
SIP revision is consistent with the applicable provisions of the CAA
for the reasons provided in the NPR. Through this action, EPA is not
removing the federal 7.8 psi RVP requirement for Davidson, Rutherford,
Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties. Any such action would occur in
a separate rulemaking.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds that there is good
cause for this action to become effective immediately upon publication.
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary because today's
action approves a noninterference demonstration that will serve as the
basis of a subsequent action to relieve the Area from certain CAA
requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective
date for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which
provides that rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days
after publication if the rule grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which allows an
effective date less than 30 days after publication as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule. The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section
553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, this rule will serve as a basis for a subsequent action
to relieve the Area from certain CAA requirements. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this action to become
effective on the date of publication of this action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submittal that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, October 7, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 30, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements and
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 31, 2017.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR--Tennessee
0
2. Section 52.2220(e) is amended by adding a new entry for ``1997 8-
hour ozone maintenance plan update for the Middle Tennessee Area and
RVP standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 20262]]
EPA-Approved Tennessee Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of non-regulatory SIP geographic or State EPA approval
provision nonattainment effective date date Explanation
area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
1997 8-hour ozone maintenance Davidson, 11/21/2016 5/1/2017, ...........................
plan update for the Middle Rutherford, [Insert Federal
Tennessee Area and RVP Sumner, Register
standard. Williamson, and citation].
Wilson Counties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-08646 Filed 4-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P