Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers, Freight Forwarders, and Brokers |
|---|
|
Daphne Y. Jefferson
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
5 June 2017
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25753-25754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11544]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 387
[Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0211]
RIN 2126-AB74
Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers, Freight Forwarders,
and Brokers
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
[[Page 25754]]
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA withdraws its November 28, 2014 advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning financial responsibility for
motor carriers, freight forwarders, and brokers. FMCSA is authorized to
establish minimum levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers
at or above the minimum levels set by Congress. In the ANPRM, FMCSA
sought public comment on whether to exercise its discretion to increase
the minimum levels of financial responsibility, and, if so, to what
levels. After reviewing all public comments to the ANPRM, FMCSA has
determined that it has insufficient data or information to support
moving forward with a rulemaking proposal, at this time.
DATES: As of June 5, 2017 the proposed published on November 28, 2014
at 79 FR 70839 is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Secrist, Chief, Registration,
Licensing & Insurance Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001,
by telephone at 202-385-2367 or by email at jeff.secrist@dot.gov. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
please contact Docket Services at (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ANPRM
On November 28, 2014, FMCSA published an ANPRM regarding Financial
Responsibility for Motor Carriers, Brokers, and Freight Forwarders (79
FR 70839). In the ANPRM, the Agency announced that it was considering a
rulemaking that would increase minimum levels of motor carrier
financial responsibility for bodily injury or property damage \1\ and
sought information in connection with that potential rulemaking. In
addition, the Agency asked several questions related to broker/freight
forwarder financial responsibility as it continues to implement Section
32918 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Pub. L.
112-141) (MAP-21)(79 FR at 70842).\2\ Finally, the Agency asked a
series of questions in the ANPRM pertaining to (1) trip insurance for
Mexican carriers, (2) the discretionary imposition of financial
responsibility requirements for motor passenger carrier brokers
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 13904(f), and (3) its self-insurance program for
motor carriers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FMCSA's regulations (49 CFR part 387 Subparts A and B)
require certain property and passenger motor carriers to maintain
financial responsibility at the statutory minimums set forth in 49
U.S.C. 31138 and 31139.
\2\ While FMCSA is withdrawing this ANPRM, the Agency continues
its implementation of MAP-21 Section 32918 in a separate docket
(FMCSA-2016-0102). On May 20, 2016, the Agency held a full-day
informal roundtable discussion pertaining to broker/freight
forwarder financial responsibility (81 FR 24935). The Agency
received approximately 30 public comments in the meeting docket and
is continuing to examine options for addressing the issues covered
in that discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the core ANPRM issue of motor carrier financial
responsibility limits, FMCSA sought public comment on whether to
exercise its discretion to increase the minimum levels, and, if so, to
what levels. Specifically, in the effort to gather relevant data, FMCSA
posed a series of questions addressing the following matters:
Premium Rates.
Current Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility.
Impacts of Increasing the Minimum Level of Financial
Responsibility.
Compensation.
Sources of Information.
Timelines for implementation.
Discussion of Comments
The Agency received 2,181 public comments in response to the ANPRM.
Various stakeholders commented, including representatives of motor
carriers, insurance companies, broker/freight forwarders, safety
advocates, attorneys, drivers, and many others. Approximately 120
submissions, including one submission reflecting a petition signed by
11,366 individuals, expressed general support for increasing the
minimum levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers without
providing a substantive rationale for their opinion. Approximately 145
submissions expressed general opposition to increasing the minimum
levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers without providing
a substantive rationale for their opinions. The Agency appreciates the
level of interest shown in the ANPRM and the efforts that stakeholders
made to provide responsive information.
FMCSA Decision
After considering whether to move forward with this rulemaking, the
Agency has decided to withdraw the November 28, 2014 ANPRM because the
Agency does not have sufficient data or information to support further
rulemaking.
Despite receiving a significant number of comments in response to
the ANPRM, commenters did not provide responsive information necessary
to allow the Agency to proceed to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.\3\
In particular, commenters did not provide sufficient cost or benefit
data and the Agency was unable to otherwise obtain sufficient data on
industry practice with respect to the level of liability limits in
excess of the Agency's minimum financial responsibility requirements,
the cost of such premiums and the frequency of, and the amount by which
bodily injury and property damage claims exceed policy liability
limits. The anecdotal and hypothetical data provided by commenters are
not sufficient to allow the Agency to perform a systematic cost-benefit
analysis that would be required to raise motor carrier minimum
financial responsibility through a rulemaking. That is, based on the
information provided, FMCSA is not able to determine (1) potential
increases in insurance premiums associated with increased financial
responsibility limits, or (2) or the impact of an increase in minimum
financial responsibility requirements on insurance company capital
requirements set by insurance regulators to ensure there are sufficient
reserves to minimize the risk of insolvency and protect consumers.
Moreover, FMCSA is not able to calculate economic benefits from having
more financial resources available to assist crash victims associated
with increased minimum financial responsibility limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In a November 5, 2014 letter to the Acting Administrator of
FMCSA, the Agency's Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC)
provided recommendations to the Agency related to financial
responsibility requirements. While MCSAC provided useful
information, its task was not to develop cost and benefit
information for use in a rulemaking proceeding.
Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.87 on: May
25, 2017.
Daphne Y. Jefferson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2017-11544 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P