Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 |
|---|
|
Gary Taverman
Department of Commerce
16 March 2018
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11690-11694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05376]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-016]
Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Giti
Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd. (Giti) and its affiliates as well as
Qingdao Sentury Tire Co., Ltd. (Sentury) and its affiliates,
manufacturers/exporters of certain passenger vehicle and light truck
tires (passenger tires) from the People's Republic of China (China),
sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal
value (NV) during the period of review (POR) January 27, 2015, through
July 31, 2016.
DATES: Applicable March 16, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, Lingjun Wang, or Jun Jack
Zhao, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1398, (202) 482-2316, or (202) 482-1396, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the preliminary results of this administrative
review of passenger tires from China on September 7, 2017.\1\ We
verified Sentury and its U.S. affiliate from December 11 through 15,
2017, and December 20 through 22, 2017. We invited interested parties
to comment on the Preliminary Results. On January 3, 2017, Commerce
postponed the final results of review until March 6, 2018. Between
February 5 and 12, 2018, Commerce received timely filed briefs and
rebuttal briefs from various interested parties. Based on an analysis
of the comments received, Commerce has made changes to the weighted-
average dumping margins determined for respondents. The weighted-
average dumping margins are listed in the ``Final Results of
Administrative Review'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments,
and Rescission, in Part; 2015-2016, 82 FR 42281, (September 7, 2017)
and accompanying preliminary decision memorandum (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018.
If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with
Commerce's practice, the deadline will become the next business day.
The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now March
9, 2018.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23,
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been
extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order is passenger vehicle and light truck tires.
Passenger vehicle and light truck tires are new pneumatic tires, of
rubber, with a passenger vehicle or light truck size designation.\3\
Merchandise covered by this order is classifiable under subheadings
4011.10.10.10, 4011.10.10.20, 4011.10.10.30, 4011.10.10.40,
4011.10.10.50, 4011.10.10.60, 4011.10.10.70, 4011.10.50.00,
4011.20.10.05, 4011.20.50.10, 4011.99.45.10, 4011.99.45.50,
4011.99.85.10, 4011.99.85.50, 8708.70.45.45,
[[Page 11691]]
8708.70.45.60, 8708.70.60.30, 8708.70.60.45, and 8708.70.60.60 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
``Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's
Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of the 2015-2016 Antidumping Administrative Review,'' (dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice) (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ The issues are
identified in Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at ``Scope of the Order''
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affiliation and Single Entity Determination
In the Preliminary Results Commerce continued to find, based on its
finding in the investigation of this proceeding, that Giti, Giti Tire
(USA) Ltd. (Giti USA); Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd. (Giti
Radial Anhui); Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd. (Giti Fujian); and Giti
Tire (Hualin) Company Ltd. (Giti Hualin) are affiliated exporters/
manufacturers of subject merchandise and should be treated as a single
entity (the Giti Entity) for purposes of this review.\5\ No interested
party has disputed this treatment, and so these findings remain
unchanged for these final results. Commerce stated in the Preliminary
Results that we would analyze whether to collapse (i.e., treat as a
single entity) Giti with its other affiliated producers Giti Tire
Greatwall Company, Ltd. (Giti Greatwall), Giti Tire (Anhui) Company,
Ltd. (Giti Anhui), Giti Tire (Yinchuan) Company, Ltd. (Giti Yinchuan),
and Giti Tire (Chongqing) Company, Ltd. (Giti Chongqing) after the
preliminary results.\6\ For these final results, Commerce finds that
Giti is also affiliated with Giti Greatwall, Giti Anhui, Giti Yinchuan,
and Giti Chongqing pursuant to section 771(33)(E) of the Act, and that
the four producers are affiliated with each other, pursuant to section
771(33)(F) of the Act. Additionally, Commerce finds that it is
appropriate to collapse these entities with the Giti Entity, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.401(f). The proprietary discussion of Commerce's decision
is included in a separate memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 11-12.
\6\ Id. at 12.
\7\ See Commerce Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of Certain
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic
of China: Collapsing of Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd. and
Affiliated Producers,'' (dated concurrently with the instant
notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined Highpoint Trading,
Ltd.; Federal Tire (Jiangxi), Ltd.; Federal Corporation; Weihai Ping'an
Tyre Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International
Trading Co., Ltd.; Seatex PTE. Ltd.; Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd.;
Shandong Hawk International Rubber Industry Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Honghua
Tyre Factory (Honghua); and Zenith Holding (HK) Limited each had no
shipments during the POR.\8\ As we have not received any information to
contradict our preliminary finding, we determine that these entities
did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We
will issue appropriate instructions that are consistent with our
``automatic assessment'' clarification, for these final results.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results at 82 FR 42282.
\9\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011)
(Assessment Notice); see also ``Assessment Rates'' section of this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we found that evidence provided by
Giti, Sentury, and 63 other exporters supported finding an absence of
both de jure and de facto government control, and, therefore, we
preliminarily granted a separate rate to each of these companies.\10\
We received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary
Results that provides a basis for reconsidering these determinations
with respect to the separate rate status of the 65 entities. Therefore,
for the final results, we continue to find that these entities are
eligible for separate rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id. at 42283-42284; see also Preliminary Results PDM at
Appendix 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Commerce inadvertently listed Haohua Orient
International Trade Ltd. and Nankang (Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone)
Rubber Industrial Co., Ltd as both qualifying for and not qualifying
for separate rate status.\11\ We clarify that we find both companies
are eligible for separate rates and Appendix II below has been
corrected for these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Preliminary Results at 82 FR 42283-42284 and Appendix
1; see also Preliminary Results PDM at Appendices 1 and 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, Commerce continues to find that the remaining entities
listed as not qualifying for separate rates have failed to demonstrate
an absence of de jure and/or de facto government control, and, thus,
are not eligible for separate rates. A list of entities that are not
entitled to separate rate status for this administrative review are
included in Appendix II of this notice.
Adjustments for Export Subsidies and Double-Remedies
Pursuant to section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, Commerce has granted
an export subsidy adjustment to Giti and Sentury. In addition, pursuant
to sections 777A(f)(1)(A)-(C) of the Act, Commerce has granted a
double-remedy adjustment to Giti and Sentury for these final results.
The antidumping duty rate assigned to the non-examined exporters which
qualify for a separate rate reflects the export subsidy and double-
remedy adjustments granted to the mandatory respondents.
Final Results of Review
Commerce finds that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the POR:
[[Page 11692]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd./Giti Tire (USA) 1.50
Ltd./Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd./ \12\
Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd./Giti Tire (Hualin)
Company Ltd./Giti Tire Greatwall Company, Ltd./Giti
Tire (Anhui) Company, Ltd./Giti Tire (Yinchuan)
Company, Ltd./Giti Tire (Chongqing) Company, Ltd...
Qingdao Sentury Tire Co., Ltd/Sentury Tire USA Inc./ 4.41
Sentury (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited...........
Actyon Tyre Resources Co., Limited.................. 2.96
Shandong Anchi Tyres Co., Ltd....................... 2.96
Briway Tire Co., Ltd................................ 2.96
Shandong Changfeng Tyres Co., Ltd................... 2.96
Qingdao Crown Chemical Co., Ltd..................... 2.96
Crown International Corporation..................... 2.96
Qingzhou Detai International Trading Co., Ltd....... 2.96
Shandong Duratti Rubber Corporation Co. Ltd......... 2.96
Shouguang Firemax Tyre Co., Ltd..................... 2.96
Fleming Limited..................................... 2.96
Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp., Ltd..................... 2.96
Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd................ 2.96
Guangrao Taihua International Trade Co., Ltd........ 2.96
Shandong Guofeng Rubber Plastics Co., Ltd........... 2.96
Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd......................... 2.96
Haohua Orient International Trade Ltd............... 2.96
Shandong Hengyu Science & Technology Co., Ltd....... 2.96
Hongkong Tiancheng Investment & Trading Co., Limited 2.96
Hongtyre Group Co................................... 2.96
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd....................... 2.96
Jinyu International Holding Co., Limited............ 2.96
Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co., Ltd........... 2.96
Jilin Jixing Tire Co., Ltd.......................... 2.96
Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd....................... 2.96
Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited............ 2.96
Koryo International Industrial Limited.............. 2.96
Kumho Tire Co., Inc................................. 2.96
Qingdao Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd....................... 2.96
Liaoning Permanent Tyre Co., Ltd.................... 2.96
Shandong Longyue Rubber Co., Ltd.................... 2.96
Macho Tire Corporation Limited...................... 2.96
Maxon Int'l Co., Limited............................ 2.96
Mayrun Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited..................... 2.96
Qingdao Nama Industrial Co., Ltd.................... 2.96
Nankang (Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone) Rubber 2.96
Industrial Co., Ltd................................
Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Ltd................ 2.96
Qingdao Odyking Tyre Co., Ltd....................... 2.96
Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Co., Ltd............ 2.96
Riversun Industry Limited........................... 2.96
Roadclaw Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited................... 2.96
Safe & Well (HK) International Trading Limited...... 2.96
Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd......................... 2.96
Sailun Jinyu Group (Hong Kong) Co., Limited......... 2.96
Shandong Jinyu Industrial Co., Ltd.................. 2.96
Sailun Tire International Corp...................... 2.96
Seatex International Inc............................ 2.96
Dynamic Tire Corp................................... 2.96
Husky Tire Corp..................................... 2.96
Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufactured Co., Ltd.. 2.96
Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd..................... 2.96
Shandong Yonking Rubber Co., Ltd.................... 2.96
Shandong Shuangwang Rubber Co., Ltd................. 2.96
Shengtai Group Co., Ltd............................. 2.96
Techking Tires Limited.............................. 2.96
Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.............................. 2.96
Tyrechamp Group Co., Limited........................ 2.96
Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd................... 2.96
Windforce Tyre Co., Limited......................... 2.96
Winrun Tyre Co., Ltd................................ 2.96
Shandong Yongtai Group Co., Ltd..................... 2.96
Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd..................... 2.96
Shandong Zhongyi Rubber Co., Ltd.................... 2.96
Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd........................... 2.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In the Preliminary Results, Commerce inadvertently listed
``Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd.'' as ``Giti Tire (Anhui)
Company Ltd.'' The name is corrected for these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise,
where applicable, in accordance with the final results of this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
the date of publication of these final results of review.\13\ For each
individually examined respondent in this review whose weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce calculated importer-specific assessment rates, in accordance
with 19
[[Page 11693]]
CFR 351.212(b)(1).\14\ Where the respondent reported reliable entered
values, Commerce calculated importer-specific ad valorem assessment
rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S.
sales to the importer, and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to the importer.\15\ Where the importer did not
report entered values, Commerce calculated an importer-specific
assessment rate by dividing the amount of dumping for reviewed sales to
the importer by the total sales quantity associated with those
transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is
not zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the
appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the
respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or
an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\16\ We intend to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-
wide entity at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\16\ See Final Modification, 77 FR at 8103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Commerce practice, for entries that were not reported
in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually
examined during this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
such entries at the rate for the PRC-wide entity.\17\ Additionally, if
Commerce determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of
the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that
exporter's CBP case number will be liquidated at the rate for the PRC-
wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full
discussion of this practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on POR entries, and for future deposits of estimated
antidumping duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for
antidumping duties equal to the weighted-average amount by which NV
exceeds U.S. price. The following cash deposit requirements will be
effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative
review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication
date of this notice, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act:
(1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results
of this review (except, if the rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), then the cash deposit rate will be zero for that exporter),
adjusted, where appropriate, for export subsidies and domestic
subsidies passed through; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed
China and non-China exporters not listed above that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) for all China exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 76.46 percent)
\18\ and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject merchandise that
have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to the China exporter that supplied that non-China
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Order, 80 FR 47904.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or
countervailing duties has occurred, and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties and/or an increase in the amount of
antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties.
Notifications to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion
to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results of review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues:
Comment 1: Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to
Sentury
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Grant Sentury a Double-
Remedies Adjustment
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Revise how It Implements Any
Double-Remedy Adjustment
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Revise Its Calculation of the
Irrecoverable Value Added Tax (VAT) Adjustment to U.S. Price
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Correct Sentury's Reporting
of Early Payments (EARLPYU)
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Re-Calculate Giti's Market
Economy Purchase (MEP) Values and Volumes
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Change the Thai Harmonized
Tariff Schedule (HTS) Codes Used for Two Giti Compound Rubber Inputs
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Re-Calculate Certain
Surrogate Values Used for Giti in the Preliminary Results
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Correct Giti's Packing Labor
Calculation
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Value Truck Freight Based on
the World Bank's Doing Business Report
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Grant Separate Rate Status
to Shandong Hongsheng Rubber Co. Ltd. (Hongsheng), Qingdao Yongdao,
International Trade Co. Ltd. (Yongdao), and Poplar Tire
International Co. Ltd. (Poplar)
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Grant Separate Rate Status
to Shandong Yongtai Group Co., Ltd. (Yongtai Group) and Shandong
Yongtai Chemical Co., Ltd. (Yongtai Chemical)
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Grant Separate Rate Status
to Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. (Pirelli)
V. Conclusion
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Receiving Separate Rate Status
1. American Pacific Industries, Inc.
[[Page 11694]]
2. BC Tyre Group Limited
3. Best Choice International Trade Co., Limited
4. Cheng Shin Tire & Rubber (China) Co., Ltd.
5. Guangzhou Pearl River Rubber Tyre Ltd.
6. Hebei Tianrui Rubber Co., Ltd.
7. Hong Kong Tri-Ace Tire Co., Limited
8. Hwa Fong Rubber (Hong Kong) Ltd.
9. ITG Voma Corporation
10. Nankang International Co., Ltd.
11. Nankang Rubber Tire Corp., Ltd.
12. Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd.
13. Qingdao Goalstar Tire Co., Ltd.
14. Qingdao Nexen Tire Corporation
15. Qingdao Qianzhen Tyre Co., Ltd.
16. Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd.
17. Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd.
18. Shandong Changhong Rubber Tech
19. Shandong Good Forged Alum Wheel
20. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.
21. Shandong Haolong Rubber Tire Co., Ltd.
22. Shandong Huitong Tyre Co., Ltd.
23. Shandong Sangong Rubber Co., Ltd.
24. Shangong Ogreen International Trade Co., Ltd.
25. Shifeng Juxing Tire Co., Ltd.
26. Southeast Mariner International Co., Ltd.
27. Toyo Tire (Zhangjiagang) Co., Ltd.
28. Wanli Group Trade Limited
29. Xiamen Sunrise Wheel Group Co., Ltd.
30. Xiamen Topu Import
31. Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited
32. Zhejiang Qingda Rubber Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2018-05376 Filed 3-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P