Home Page American Government Reference Desk Shopping Special Collections About Us Contribute



Escort, Inc.






GM Icons
By accessing/using The Crittenden Automotive Library/CarsAndRacingStuff.com, you signify your agreement with the Terms of Use on our Legal Information page. Our Privacy Policy is also available there.

General Motors LLC, Receipt of Third Petition for Inconsequentiality and Notice of Consolidation


American Government Topics:  General Motors, Takata

General Motors LLC, Receipt of Third Petition for Inconsequentiality and Notice of Consolidation

Jonathan C. Morrison
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
9 April 2018


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15233-15236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0124; Notice 3]


General Motors LLC, Receipt of Third Petition for 
Inconsequentiality and Notice of Consolidation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition and decision denying request for 
deferral of determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 2, 2018, TK Holdings Inc. (Takata) filed a defect 
information report (DIR), in which it determined that a defect existed 
in certain passenger-side air bag inflators that it manufactured, 
including passenger inflators that it supplied to General Motors, LLC 
(GM) for use in certain GMT900 vehicles. GM has petitioned the Agency 
for a decision that, because of differences in inflator design and 
vehicle integration, the equipment defect determined to exist by Takata 
is inconsequential as it relates to

[[Page 15234]]

motor vehicle safety in the GMT900 vehicles, and that GM should 
therefore be relieved of its notification and remedy obligations. This 
notice serves to make the public aware of GM's pending request to the 
agency and the period for public comment. It does not address GM's 
substantive claims, nor legal arguments or interpretations asserted by 
GM.

DATES: The closing date for comments is May 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments regarding this petition for inconsequentiality. 
Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited in the title 
of this notice and be submitted by one of the following methods:
     Internet: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-140, 
Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12-140, 
Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Facsimile: (202) 493-2251.
    You may call the Docket at (202) 366-9324.
    Note that all comments received will be posted without change to 
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided. Thus, submitting such information makes it public. You may 
wish to read the Privacy Act notice, which can be viewed by clicking on 
the ``Privacy and Security Notice'' link in the footer of http://www.regulations.gov. DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available 
for review in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 
19477-78).
    The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received 
before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will 
be filed in the docket and will be considered. Comments and supporting 
materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will 
be considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or 
denied, notice of the decision will also be published in the Federal 
Register pursuant to the authority indicated at the end of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For legal issues: Stephen Hench, 
Office of the Chief Counsel, NCC-100, National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 
(telephone: (202) 366-5263).
    For general information regarding NHTSA's investigation into Takata 
air bag inflator ruptures and the related recalls: http://www.safercar.gov/rs/takata/index.html.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On May 4, 2016, NHTSA issued, and Takata agreed to, an Amendment to 
the November 3, 2015 Consent Order (the ``Amendment''), under which 
Takata is bound to declare a defect in all frontal driver and passenger 
air bag inflators that contain a phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate 
(PSAN)-based propellant and do not contain a moisture-absorbing 
desiccant. Such defect declarations are being made on a rolling basis, 
with the first declaration due May 16, 2016, the second declaration due 
December 31, 2016, and the third declaration due December 31, 2017. See 
Amendment at ] 14.

GM's May 2016 & January 2017 DIRs

    Takata timely submitted the first scheduled equipment DIRs on May 
16, 2016. See Recall Nos. 16E-042, 16E-043, and 16E-044. Those DIRs 
included non-desiccated passenger inflators, designated as types SPI YP 
and PSPI-L YD, that were installed as original equipment on certain 
motor vehicles manufactured by GM (the ``covered passenger 
inflators''), as well as other non-desiccated passenger inflators 
installed as original equipment on motor vehicles manufactured by a 
number of other automakers, which are not at issue here.
    The Takata filing triggered GM's obligation to file a DIR for the 
affected GM vehicles. See 49 CFR part 573; Amendment at ] 16; November 
3, 2015 Coordinated Remedy Order at ] 46. GM ultimately submitted two 
DIRs on May 27, 2016. See Recall Nos. 16V-381 (for vehicles in Zone A) 
and 16V-383 (for vehicles in Zone B). On November 15, 2016, GM 
petitioned the Agency, under 49 U.S.C. 30118(d), 30120(h) and 49 CFR 
part 556, for a decision that the equipment defect determined to exist 
by Takata is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety in 
the GMT900 vehicles. See GM's Petition for Inconsequentiality and 
Request for Deferral of Determination Regarding Certain GMT900 Vehicles 
Equipped with Takata ``SPI YP'' and ``PSPI-L YD'' Passenger Inflators 
(the ``First Petition for Inconsequentiality'' or ``First Petition''). 
In a Notice published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2016, the 
Agency published notice of the First Petition and granted two 
administrative requests, accepting the petition out of time and 
granting GM additional time to provide data in support of the petition. 
See 81 FR 85681.
    On January 3, 2017, Takata timely submitted the second scheduled 
equipment DIRs for additional covered passenger inflators. See Recall 
Nos. 17E-001, 17E-002, and 17E-003. Again, the Takata filing triggered 
GM's obligation to file a DIR for the affected GM vehicles. See 49 CFR 
part 573; Amendment at ] 16; Third Amendment to Coordinated Remedy 
Order at ] 32. GM ultimately submitted its DIRs on January 10, 2017, 
and notified NTHSA of its intention to file an inconsequentiality 
petition. See Recall Nos. 17V-010, 17V-019, and 17V-021.\1\ 
Contemporaneous with its DIRs, GM submitted to the Agency a Petition 
for Inconsequentiality and Request for Deferral of Determination 
Regarding Certain GMT900 Vehicles Equipped with Takata ``SPI YP'' and 
``PSPI-L YD'' Passenger Inflators Subject to January 2017 Takata 
Equipment DIR Filings (the ``Second Petition for Inconsequentiality'' 
or ``Second Petition'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ When a manufacturer files a petition for inconsequentiality, 
the affected DIR will not be made public unless and until the Agency 
denies the petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 11, 2017, the Agency published a notice of receipt of 
the Second Petition and, as GM's Second Petition was virtually 
identical to its First Petition (both involved the same covered 
passenger inflators and same vehicle platform, relied upon the same 
purported evidence, and would rely upon the same forthcoming report), 
consolidated the Second Petition with the First Petition under Docket 
No. NHTSA-2016-0124. See 82 FR 42718.

GM's January 9, 2018 DIRs

    Takata timely submitted \2\ the third scheduled equipment DIRs on 
January 2, 2018. Those DIRs included additional covered passenger 
inflators. Once more, the Takata filing triggered GM's obligation to 
file a DIR for the affected GM vehicles. See 49 CFR part 573; Amendment 
at ] 16; Third Amendment to Coordinated Remedy Order at ] 32. GM 
submitted its DIRs on January 9, 2018.\3\ Therein, in accordance with 
49 CFR 573.6(c)(8)(iii), GM notified

[[Page 15235]]

NHTSA of its intention to file a petition for inconsequentiality and 
contemporaneously submitted to the Agency a Petition for 
Inconsequentiality Regarding Certain GMT900 Vehicles Equipped with 
Takata ``SPI YP'' and ``PSPI-L YD'' Passenger Inflators Subject to 
January 2018 Takata Equipment DIR Filings (the ``Third Petition for 
Inconsequentiality'' or ``Third Petition''). GM's Third Petition 
requested that NHTSA grant GM's First, Second and Third Petitions or, 
in the alternative, that NHTSA defer its decision on the First, Second, 
and Third Petitions until March 31, 2018, which would allow GM time to 
complete further study and analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ December 31, 2017 was a Sunday, and Monday, January 1, 2018 
was a federal holiday.
    \3\ When a manufacturer files a petition for inconsequentiality, 
the corresponding DIR will not be made public unless and until the 
Agency denies the petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Class of Motor Vehicles Involved

    GM's Third Petition involves certain ``GMT900'' vehicles that 
contain the covered passenger inflators (designated as inflator types 
``SPI YP'' and ``PSPI-L YD''). GMT900 is a GM-specific vehicle platform 
that forms the structural foundation for a variety of GM trucks and 
sport utility vehicles, including: Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 
1500, Chevrolet Silverado 2500/3500, GMC Sierra 2500/3500, Chevrolet 
Tahoe, Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Avalanche, GMC Yukon, GMC Yukon 
XL, Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac Escalade ESV, and Cadillac Escalade 
EXT. The Third Petition involves the following GMT900 vehicles:
     In Zone A, affected model year 2013 GMT900 vehicles. Zone 
A comprises the following states and U.S. territories: Alabama, 
California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, South 
Carolina, Texas, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern 
Mariana Islands (Saipan), and the U.S. Virgin Islands. See Amendment at 
] 7.a.
     In Zone B, affected model year 2010 GMT900 vehicles. Zone 
B comprises the following states: Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District 
of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, 
Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, 
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. See 
Amendment at ] 7.b.
     In Zone C, affected model year 2009 GMT900 vehicles. Zone 
C comprises the following states: Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, 
Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New 
Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, 
Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. See Amendment at ] 
7.c.

III. Summary of GM's Third Petition for Inconsequentiality

    GM's Third Petition relies on arguments, data, and analysis in its 
First and Second Petitions (and supplemental brief thereto), 
information submitted to the Agency during briefings with NHTSA, and 
additional arguments and engineering analysis as presented in the Third 
Petition. See Third Petition at 1, 3. According to the Third Petition, 
GM's originally planned Orbital ATK (``OATK'') inflator study is now 
complete,\4\ which GM argues demonstrates the covered passenger 
inflators in subject GMT900 vehicles ``will continue to operate safely 
for decades, even in the highest temperature and humidity regions''--
i.e., that the covered passenger inflators, as integrated into the 
GMT900 vehicles, do not present an unreasonable risk to safety. See id. 
at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ To supplement its internal analysis, GM retained a third-
party expert, OATK, to conduct a long-term aging study to estimate 
the service life expectancy of the covered passenger inflators in 
the GMT900 vehicles. See First Petition at 12. When NHTSA previously 
deferred a decision on GM's First Petition, one of the conditions of 
that deferral was that GM provide NHTSA with monthly updates on this 
study.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the Third Petition, GM's position is based upon the 
following: field data, including GM's estimated 63,000 Takata passenger 
air bag inflator deployments in GMT900 vehicles without a reported 
rupture and ballistic tests of 4,205 covered passenger inflators 
without a rupture or sign of abnormal deployment, and results of the 
OATK study of inflators artificially exposed to additional humidity and 
temperature cycling without a rupture or abnormal deployment, and 
accompanying statistical interpretation of those results. Id. at 12-15.
    GM further states that the covered passenger inflators are not used 
by any other original equipment manufacturer and, further, that the 
covered inflators have a number of unique design features that 
influence burn rates and internal ballistic dynamics, including greater 
vent-area-to-propellant-mass ratios, steel end caps, and thinner 
propellant wafers. See id. at 6. In addition, GM states that the 
physical environment of the GMT900 vehicles better protects the covered 
passenger inflators from temperature cycling that can lead to 
propellant degradation and, ultimately, inflator rupture. See id. at 7.
    This notice serves to make the public aware of GM's pending request 
to the agency and the period for public comment. Accordingly, it does 
not address the substantive claims, or legal arguments or 
interpretations, asserted by GM.

IV. Consolidation

    GM's Third Petition for Inconsequentiality involves newer model 
years of the same covered passenger inflators (i.e., frontal passenger 
inflator types ``SPI YP'' and ``PSPI-L YD''), the same vehicle platform 
(i.e., the GMT900), and similar purported evidence to support the 
safety of the inflators (e.g., estimated field deployments, ballistic 
testing), and relies upon the same OATK study as GM's First and Second 
Petitions. Accordingly, it is appropriate to evaluate the First, 
Second, and Third Petitions together. In the interest of clarity, 
consistency, and efficiency, the Agency is consolidating the Third 
Petition with the First and Second Petitions (the ``Consolidated 
Petitions'') under Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0124.

V. Request To Defer Decision on Petition

    GM states it believes the evidence it has thus far presented 
``fully supports'' the relief it requests in the Consolidated 
Petitions. Id. at 17. Alternatively, GM requests that NHTSA defer its 
decision until March 31, 2018 Id. According to GM, this would allow it 
to conduct further studies and analysis that can develop an estimate of 
the covered inflators' likely service life beyond 30 years, as well as 
a predictive model of service-life estimates to account for inflator 
design and vehicle integration. See id.
    NHTSA's grant of GM's request to defer a decision on the First 
Petition until August 31, 2017 so that GM could provide additional 
evidence, including concluding the OATK study, was unprecedented. As 
NHTSA noted in granting that request, ``[o]rdinarily, under 49 CFR 
556.4(b)(5), an inconsequentiality petition must set forth all data, 
views, and arguments supporting that petition'' \5\ at the time of the 
filing. Decision deferrals for inconsequentiality petitions are not 
permitted, and permitting that practice would provide manufacturers 
with an opportunity to endlessly delay remedy of vehicles in need of 
repair. Here, one important factor in NHTSA's decision to grant the 
deferral was GM's assertion that remedy parts would quickly be 
available to the public in the event the petition was denied. NHTSA's 
extraordinary grant of additional time to present information allowed 
GM until

[[Page 15236]]

August 31, 2017 to provide data, and that date has passed. However, 
following notice and an opportunity for comment, any decision on an 
inconsequentiality petition can be reversed based on the presentation 
of new evidence. 49 CFR 556.8. Accordingly, GM's request that NHTSA 
defer decision on the Third Petition until March 31, 3017 is herein 
denied. However, until NHTSA renders a decision on GM's Petitions, the 
Agency will continue to accept and, to the extent feasible, consider 
documents submitted relevant to the Petitions, which NHTSA will make 
available for public comment in Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0124.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ General Motors LLC, Receipt of Petition for 
Inconsequentiality and Decision Granting Request To File Out of Time 
and Request for Deferral of Determination, 81 FR 85681, 85683-84.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, NHTSA hereby gives notice of its receipt of General 
Motors LLC's Petition for Inconsequentiality Regarding Certain GMT900 
Vehicles Equipped with Takata ``SPI YP'' and ``PSPI-L YD'' Passenger 
Inflators Subject to January 2018 Takata Equipment DIR Filings. And it 
is hereby ordered that:
    1. The period for public comment on GM's Third Petition shall run 
from the publication date of this notice through May 9, 2018;
    2. GM's Third Petition is consolidated with the First and Second 
Petitions; and
    3. GM's request for a deferral of NHTSA's decision on its First, 
Second, and Third Petitions to March 31, 2018, is denied.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., 30118, 30120(h), 30162, 
30166(b)(1), 30166(g)(1); delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95(a); 
49 CFR parts 556, 573, 577.

    Issued: April 3, 2018.
Jonathan C. Morrison,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-07188 Filed 4-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P




The Crittenden Automotive Library