Hours of Service of Drivers: American Bakers Association and International Dairy Foods Association; Application for Exemption |
|---|
|
Larry W. Minor
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
18 December 2018
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64927-64929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27345]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0312]
Hours of Service of Drivers: American Bakers Association and
International Dairy Foods Association; Application for Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that it has received a joint application from
the American Bakers Association (ABA) and the International Dairy Foods
Association (IDFA) requesting an exemption from the hours-of-service
(HOS) regulations for drivers engaged in the delivery of baked goods
and milk products during periods and in geographic areas reasonably
anticipated to be impacted by an impending natural disaster or
emergency situation. ABA/IDFA requests a 5-year exemption from 49 CFR
part 395 for their drivers engaged in the delivery of essential food
staples to extend their driving hours to help communities prepare for
anticipated disaster conditions, such as extreme weather events,
natural disasters, and other emergencies. The applicants state that the
exemption would achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved absent the proposed exemption.
FMCSA requests public comment on ABA/IDFA's application for exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System Number FMCSA-2018-0312 by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. See the
Public Participation and Request for Comments section below for further
information.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, please contact Mr. Richard Clemente, Transportation Specialist,
FMCSA Driver and Carrier Operations Division; Telephone: (202) 366-
2722; Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone
(202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2018-0312), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2018-0312'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
[[Page 64928]]
The decision of the Agency must be published in the Federal Register
(49 CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the
application and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons
receiving the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the
exemption is granted. The notice must also specify the effective period
(up to 5 years) and explain the terms and conditions of the exemption.
The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
The American Bakers Association (ABA) represents the wholesale
baking industry. ABA advocates on behalf of more than 1,000 baking
facilities and company suppliers. Their members produce bread, rolls,
crackers, bagels, sweet goods, tortillas, and many other baked
products. ABA advises that the average number of drivers and commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) per company is approximately 1,050, ranging from
70 to 5,500.
The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) represents the
dairy manufacturing and marketing industry. Their members range from
large multinational organizations to single-plant companies, and
together they represent more than 85 percent of the milk, cultured
products, cheese, ice cream and frozen desserts produced and marketed
in the U.S. and sold throughout the world. IDFA states that, based on
statistics for the fluid milk industry, the sector has approximately
15,500 drivers and 18,000 trucks (both tractor-trailers and smaller
delivery trucks). The industry believes that approximately 450,000,000
miles are driven each year in milk and dairy product deliveries.
ABA/IDFA requests an exemption from the provisions of 49 CFR 395.3,
``Maximum driving time for property-carrying vehicles'' for their
drivers delivering ``essential food staples,'' particularly baked goods
and milk products, in advance of anticipated natural disasters or other
emergency conditions. The requested exemption would only cover the
period of time in advance of, during, and shortly after the emergency
condition, where the HOS rules can be an unintended barrier to
efficient disaster preparations and operations.
The applicants proposed that the exemption apply during periods of
disaster preparation in anticipation of disaster conditions, to be
defined based on the existing definition of ``Emergency'' in 49 CFR
390.5, but modified to encompass conditions that are reasonably
anticipated. The exemption would apply from the time that a natural
disaster or emergency is reasonably anticipated until a reasonable time
after the disaster has resolved. ABA/IDFA states that, although some
element of reasonable judgement is necessarily inherent in this
proposed approach, a definition that is tied to an official Declaration
of Emergency would defeat the public purpose of a disaster preparation
exemption by forcing suppliers to wait until an official declaration of
emergency by the President, State governors, or FMCSA, which would
often leave insufficient lead time for disaster preparation.
Accordingly, the requested exemption should allow suppliers to use
reasonable judgment based on early warning announcements, such as
hazardous weather announcements.
ABA/IDFA advises that disaster preparation is not limited to
hurricanes, as serious storms such as ice storms, heavy rains, or
strong frontal patterns that spawn tornadoes can also wreak levels of
havoc in certain regions throughout the country. The need of consumers
for essential food staples significantly increases in advance of and
during emergency conditions, and emergency preparations are often
exacerbated by a rush on retail establishments prior to announced
emergency events.
The increased demand for essential food staples prior to threatened
natural disasters and other emergencies requires changes to delivery
logistics, schedules, and HOS for at least a 72-hour period prior to an
anticipated disaster event, as it is critical to move a large volume of
supplies into the disaster-affected area, and supplies often must be
sourced from regional distribution centers, other manufacturing
facilities that are able to increase production, or in the case of
widespread disasters, distribution systems in other regions. Disaster
preparations significantly and abruptly increase the need for driving
time, delivery routes and drivers, due to heavy traffic on roads,
challenging driving conditions, use of alternative or evacuation
routes, and disruptions such as downed trees and traffic accidents.
Furthermore, emergency conditions may create situations in which rest
breaks on normal schedules are infeasible or dangerous due to road or
parking conditions.
According to ABA/IDFA, the best way to prepare for anticipated
disasters or emergencies is to increase delivery runs ahead of the
impending situation. Because facilities in a disaster area that produce
fresh bread and milk may be without power, flooded, or otherwise
impacted by the disaster, it is often necessary to source replacement
deliveries from more distant production facilities in other regions.
Suppliers often have the ability to increase production well ahead of
emergency situations, and will begin advancing product into the market
72 hours or more ahead of the anticipated stock depletion. Experience
has shown the applicants that the HOS restrictions often become a
limiting factor at the expense of effective emergency preparations.
Perhaps the most critical factor, due to a national shortage of
licensed commercial drivers, there are simply no additional drivers or
contract carriers available to supplement normal driver ranks due to
the spiking demand ahead of and during disasters. Accordingly, the only
way to prepare for disasters is to increase routes and driving times of
regular drivers in the suppliers' distribution network.
In summary, this exemption woulld allow suppliers of essential food
staples to adapt delivery schedules to allow communities to prepare for
anticipated disaster conditions, such as extreme weather events,
natural disasters, and other emergencies that disrupt delivery
schedules and require increased driving hours. The exemption would help
avoid shortages of essential food staples at retail stores and food
establishments that could otherwise result if deliveries are restricted
by the generally applicable HOS rules in 49 CFR 395.3. ABA/IDFA states
that without an exemption to the HOS provisions, retail stores and food
establishments are more likely to run out of product, leaving consumers
lacking essential food staples during emergency conditions.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
By providing the flexibility for bakery and milk product delivery
drivers to adjust HOS during disaster conditions, suppliers will be
able to supply essential food staples with greater efficiency and
safety by allowing experienced drivers and employers to modify delivery
routes and schedules to accommodate the safe delivery of emergency
supplies.
As detailed in their application, ABA/IDFA believes the ability to
utilize the judgment of experienced, well-trained and qualified drivers
during weather events will promote safety. The nature of retail
unloading, and familiar routes, reduces concerns regarding driver
fatigue and safety. Many retail stores are open only during set hours,
which provides natural limits to the use of the exemption.The ability
to take breaks and end the day according to the
[[Page 64929]]
conditions of the road and traffic during the weather event will allow
drivers to take their time and use caution as appropriate under the
conditions at that time, rather than feeling pressure to comply with
the HOS rules that are most appropriate for normal driving conditions.
ABA/IDFA further adds that the exemption perhaps most importantly will
allow families to stock supplies at their regular neighborhood stores
and avoid the need for residents to drive unnecessarily looking for
emergency supplies of essential food staples in advance of or during a
disaster situation.
Regarding an equivalent level of safety, ABA/IDFA details the
following in their application regarding HOS compliance following the
exemption from 49 CFR 395.3: A weather ``trigger'' would start a 72-
hour HOS exemption period leading up to an anticipated storm, which
creates two possible scenarios following the exemption period: (1)
FMCSA grants a wide-scale HOS exemption period for the impacted area or
a State government declares a state of emergency and suspends the HOS
requirements, or (2) the storms impact on the region is too
insignificant to warrant an HOS exemption on either the State or
Federal level. In the case of the first scenario, the HOS requirements
for that period are already suspended and concerns of equivalent safety
will have already been considered in existing regulations In the second
scenario, the applicants propose an equivalent level of safety as
follows: (1) For the 11 hour driving time limit, for every 2 hours a
driver surpasses this limit, an additional hour will be added to the
original 10-hour rest limit to be completed between runs following the
exemption period; and (2) for the 60/70 hour limits, should a driver
surpass these normal limits during the exemption period, two additional
hours will be added to the original 34-hour off duty period required
following the exemption period. In order to verify compliance, the
hours would continue to be documented through the use of electronic
logging devices pursuant to the current rules in 49 CFR part 395,
subpart B. The requested exemption is for 5 years. A copy of ABA/IDFA's
application for exemption is available for review in the docket for
this notice.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-27345 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P