Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania's Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings |
|---|
|
Cecil Rodrigues
Environmental Protection Agency
24 October 2017
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49128-49132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22942]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0342; FRL-9969-83-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania's Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines
for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's state implementation plan (SIP). The revision includes
the addition to the SIP of amendments to the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection's (PADEP) regulations and addresses the
requirement to adopt reasonably available control technology (RACT) for
sources covered by EPA's control techniques guidelines (CTG) standards
for automobile and light-duty assembly coatings. This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on December 26, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by November 24,
2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2017-0342 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
stahl.cynthia@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from
[[Page 49129]]
Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Schulingkamp, (215) 814-2021,
or by email at schulingkamp.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ground level ozone is formed in the atmosphere by photochemical
reactions between volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides
(NOX), and carbon monoxide (CO) in the presence of sunlight.
In order to reduce ozone concentrations in the ambient air, the CAA
requires all nonattainment areas to apply control on VOC and
NOX emission sources to achieve emission reductions. Among
effective control measures, RACT controls significantly reduce VOC and
NOX emissions from major stationary sources. NOX
and VOC are referred to as ozone precursors and are emitted by many
types of pollution sources, including motor vehicles, power plants,
industrial facilities, and area wide sources, such as consumer products
and lawn and garden equipment. Scientific evidence indicates that
adverse public health effects occur following exposure to ozone. These
effects are more pronounced in children and adults with lung disease.
Breathing air containing ozone can reduce lung function and inflame
airways, which can increase respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma
or other lung diseases.
RACT is defined as the lowest emission limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility (44 FR 53761 at 53762, September 17, 1979). Section 182 of
the CAA sets forth two separate RACT requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas. The first requirement, contained in section
182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, and referred to as RACT fix-up, requires the
correction of RACT rules for which EPA identified deficiencies before
the CAA was amended in 1990. Pennsylvania previously corrected its
deficiencies under the 1-hour ozone standard and has no further
deficiencies to correct under this section of the CAA. The second
requirement, set forth in section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, applies to
moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment area as well as to marginal and
attainment areas in ozone transport regions (OTRs) established pursuant
to section 184 of the CAA, and requires these areas to implement RACT
controls on all major VOC and NOX emission sources and on
all sources and source categories covered by a CTG issued by EPA.\1\
See CAA section 182(b)(2) and 184(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CTGs are documents issued by EPA intended to provide state
and local air pollution control authorities information to assist
them in determining RACT for VOC from various sources. The
recommendations in the CTG are based upon available data and
information and may not apply to a particular situation based upon
the circumstances. States can follow the CTG and adopt state
regulations to implement the recommendations contained therein, or
they can adopt alternative approaches. In either case, states must
submit their RACT rules to EPA for review and approval as part of
the SIP process. Pursuant to section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, all
areas in the OTR must implement RACT with respect to sources of VOCs
in the state covered by a CTG issued before or after November 15,
1990.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 18, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) submitted a formal revision to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's SIP. The SIP revision consists of the adoption of EPA's
CTG for automobile and light duty assembly coatings. The new regulation
reflecting this adoption can be found under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129--
Standards for Sources. Specifically, this revision adds to the SIP 25
Pa. Code Sec. 129.52e which adopts the RACT requirements for
automobile and light-duty assembly coatings and covers heavier vehicle
coating operations as well. The revision also includes changes to 25
Pa. Code Sec. 129.51 to accommodate alternative compliance methods for
the adopted CTG.
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment
areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM),
including RACT, for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) provides
that for certain nonattainment areas, states must revise their SIPs to
include RACT for sources of VOC emissions covered by a CTG issued after
November 15, 1990 and prior to the area's date of attainment. EPA
defines RACT as ``the lowest emission limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility.'' (44 FR 53761, Sept. 17, 1979). In subsequent Federal
Register notices, EPA has addressed how states can meet the RACT
requirements of the CAA. In June 1977, EPA published a CTG for
automobile and light-duty truck assembly coatings (EPA-450/2-77-008).
This CTG discusses the nature of VOC emissions from this industry,
available control technologies for addressing such emissions, the costs
of available control options, and other items. EPA also published a
national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
surface coating of automobiles and light-duty trucks in 2004 (40 CFR
part 63, subpart IIII).
In 2008, after conducting a review of currently existing state and
local VOC emission reduction approaches for this industry, reviewing
the 1977 CTG and the NESHAP for this industry, and considering the
information that has become available since then, EPA developed a new
CTG for automobile and light-duty truck assembly coatings, entitled
Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Assembly Coatings (Publication No. EPA 453/R-08-006). Pennsylvania's
SIP revision submittal addresses the adoption of EPA's 2008 CTG for
automobile and light-duty truck assembly coatings.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
EPA's CTG for automobiles and light-duty truck assembly coatings
includes recommendations to reduce VOC emissions. These recommendations
include VOC emissions limits for coating operations; work practices for
storage and handling of coatings, thinners, and coating waste
materials; and work practices for the handling and use of cleaning
materials. The emission limits for coating processes covered by this
CTG are found in Table 1 of the technical support document (TSD) which
EPA prepared supporting this
[[Page 49130]]
rulemaking.\2\ Table 1, includes emission limits expressed in kilograms
of VOC per liter (kg VOC/liter) and pounds of VOC per gallon (lbs VOC/
gal). The emission limits for the miscellaneous materials used at
coating facilities are found in Table 2 of the TSD. Table 2 includes
emission limits expressed in grams of VOC per liter (g VOC/liter).
Additional information regarding this CTG can be found in the TSD found
in the docket for this rulemaking and available online at
www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The TSD is available in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking and available online at www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PADEP's submittal presented the regulatory revisions undertaken to
adopt EPA's CTG for automobile and light-duty truck coatings. PADEP
revised 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129--Standards for Sources to adopt the
aforementioned CTG. The revisions include the addition of Sec. 129.52e
which adopts the RACT requirements for automobile and light-duty truck
assembly coatings as stated by EPA in the relevant CTG for this
category of sources. The revision also includes updates to 25 Pa. Code
Sec. 129.51 to accommodate alternative compliance methods for the
adopted CTG. Additional information regarding PADEP's submittal can be
found within the TSD and state submittal which are both located in this
docket and available online at www.regulations.gov.
EPA reviewed PADEP's submittal and found that the regulatory
changes reflect EPA's CTG for automobile and light-duty trucks. The
emission limits for the coating processes as well as the emission
limits for the miscellaneous materials used during coating processes
are consistent with those recommended in EPA's CTG. Additionally, the
regulatory changes address EPA's recommended work practices.
EPA notes that under 25 Pa. Code Sec. 129.52e(c), Existing RACT
permit, PADEP is allowing the provisions of Sec. 129.52e to supersede
the requirements of a RACT permit previously issued under 25 Pa. Code
Sec. Sec. 129.91-129.95 if the permit was issued prior to January 1,
2017 and to the extent that the RACT permit contains less stringent
requirements than those in 25 Pa. Code Sec. 129.52e. EPA further notes
that the RACT permits issued under Sec. Sec. 129.91-129.95 were issued
for previous RACT determinations on a case-by-case basis; these permits
would then have been submitted to EPA as source-specific SIP revisions
and would likely have been approved by EPA for inclusion into the
Pennsylvania SIP. If EPA approved those source-specific RACT
determinations as meeting the requirements of RACT under the CAA, then
the permits associated with those determinations were approved into the
SIP and would have been identified at 40 CFR 52.2020(d). To the extent
that the provisions of Sec. 129.52e are more stringent than those of a
previous SIP-approved permit, PADEP may make a source-specific
determination as to whether the requirements of the previous RACT
permit apply, or those of Sec. 129.52e. If PADEP chooses to make such
a determination to remove prior case-by-case RACT limits from the SIP,
such revision must be submitted to EPA as a SIP revision in order to
remove the previously approved permit from the SIP and must meet
requirements under CAA section 110(l). Otherwise, the previously
approved RACT limits (even if less stringent) remain applicable
requirements for sources subject now to the more stringent CTG also.
Until such a SIP revision is made, the requirements of 25 Pa. Code
129.52e and the SIP-approved case by case RACT requirements both apply
and EPA cannot remove the source-specific permits from the SIP. EPA is
not taking any such action in this rulemaking to remove previously
approved RACT permits and thus the requirements of a previously SIP-
approved permit still apply until such permit is removed from the SIP
even if the new limits, reflected in this CTG that Pennsylvania has
adopted, are more stringent.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the revision to Pennsylvania's SIP which adopts
EPA's CTG for automobile and light-duty truck coatings because
Pennsylvania's regulation incorporates the requirements of the CTG and
thus meets requirements in CAA sections 110 and 184(b). EPA is
publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However,
in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will
be effective on December 26, 2017 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comment by November 24, 2017. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of 25 Pa. Code
Chapter 129--Standards for Sources, Sections 129.51 and 129.52e. EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region III
Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in
the next update of the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 49131]]
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 26, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action. This action, in which Pennsylvania adopts EPA's CTG
for automobile and light-duty truck assembly coatings, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 26, 2017.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
revising the entry for ``Section 129.51'' and adding an entry for
``Section 129.52e'' after ``Section 129.52d'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date explanation/ Sec.
date 52.2063 citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 25--Environmental Protection Article III--Air Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 129.51................ General.............. 10/22/16 10/24/17 [Insert Amendments add
Federal Register alternative
citation]. compliance methods
for the requirements
of Section 129.52e.
Previous approval
dated 6/25/2015.
* * * * * * *
Section 129.52e............... Control of VOC 10/22/16 10/24/17 [Insert New section is added.
emissions from Federal Register This section does
automobile and light- citation]. not remove or
duty truck assembly replace any permits
coating operations approved under
and heavier vehicle 52.2020(d).
coating operations.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 49132]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-22942 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P