Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US LLC |
|---|
Topics: Jeep Wrangler
|
Raymond R. Posten
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
19 October 2017
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 201 (Thursday, October 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48741-48743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US LLC
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US
LLC's, (FCA) petition for exemption of the Jeep Wrangler vehicle line
in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard.
(Theft Prevention Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
2018 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West Building, W43-
439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated June 2, 2017, FCA
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for its Jeep Wrangler vehicle line beginning with
MY 2018. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its
petition, FCA provided a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device for its Jeep Wrangler vehicle line. FCA stated that its MY 2018
Jeep Wrangler vehicle line will be installed with the Sentry Key
Immobilizer System (SKIS) antitheft device as standard equipment on the
entire vehicle line. The SKIS will provide passive vehicle protection
by
[[Page 48742]]
preventing the engine from operating unless a valid electronically
encoded key is inside the cabin of the vehicle and a valid key code is
detected in the ignition system of the vehicle. Key components of the
antitheft device will include an immobilizer, a Radio Frequency Hub
Module (RFHM), Engine Control Module (ECM), Body Controller Module
(BCM), a Transponder Key/Finger Operated Button (FOB) with Integrated
Key (FOBIK) and an Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) which contains the
telltale function only. According to FCA, these components work
collectively to perform the immobilizer function. FCA will not provide
an audible alert, however, the vehicle will be equipped with a security
indicator in the instrument panel cluster that will flash if an invalid
transponder key is detected. Specifically, FCA stated that its Wrangler
vehicles will be equipped with a security indicator that acts as a
diagnostic indicator. If the RFHM detects an invalid transponder key or
if a transponder key related fault occurs, the security indicator will
flash. If the RFHM detects a system malfunction or the SKIS becomes
ineffective, the security indicator will stay on. The SKIS also
performs a self-test each time the ignition system is turned to the RUN
position and will store fault information in its RFHM memory if a
system malfunction is detected.
FCA's submission is considered a complete petition as required by
49 CFR 543.7 in that it meets the general requirements contained in
543.5 and the specific content requirements of 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 49 CFR part
543.6, FCA provided information on the reliability and durability of
the device. FCA conducted tests based on its own specified standards
(i.e., voltage range and temperature range) and stated its belief that
the device meets the stringent performance standards prescribed.
Specifically, FCA stated that its device must demonstrate a minimum of
95 percent reliability with 90 percent confidence and 100 percent
system functionality prior to being shipped from the supplier to the
vehicle assembly plant for installation in the vehicles. FCA also
stated that each transponder key has a unique identification code that
is permanently programmed into it by the manufacturer and must be
programmed into the RFHM. Once a transponder key has been programmed to
a particular vehicle, it cannot be used on any other vehicle.
FCA stated that the SKIS immobilizer feature is activated when the
transponder key is removed from the ignition system (whether the doors
are open or not) and the ignition system is in the ``OFF'' position.
Specifically, once the SKIS is activated, only a valid transponder key
that is recognized by the ignition system will disable it and allow the
vehicle to start and continue to run. FCA stated that the functions and
features of the SKIS are all integral to the BCM in this vehicle. The
RFHM contains a Radio Frequency (RF) transceiver and a microprocessor
and it initiates the ignition process by communicating with the BCM.
The RFHM and the ECM both use software that includes a rolling code
algorithm strategy which helps to reduce the possibility of
unauthorized SKIS disarming. The microprocessor-based SKIS hardware and
software also uses electronic messages to communicate with other
electronic modules in the vehicle over the Controller Area Network
(CAN) data bus.
FCA further stated that the SKIS uses RF communication with an
Advanced Encryption System (AES) to obtain confirmation that the
transponder key is a valid FOBIK for operating the vehicle. The RFHM
initiates the ignition process by communicating with the BCM. The RFHM
contains an RF transceiver and a microprocessor. The RFHM is paired
with a Keyless Go START/STOP push button (also known as the Keyless
Ignition Node (``KIN'')). The RFHM receives Low Frequency (LF) and/or
RF signals from the Sentry Key transponder through a tuned RF antenna.
When the Keyless Go START/STOP button is pressed on the KIN, the RFHM
transmits an LF signal to the transponder key. The RFHM then waits for
a RF signal response from the transponder in the FOBIK. If the response
received identifies the FOBIK as valid, the communication between the
RFHM, the BCM, and the ECM proceeds, and the ECM allows the engine to
start. If the ECM receives an invalid key message or receives no
message from the RFHM over the CAN data bus, the engine will be
disabled. FCA further stated that its antitheft immobilizer device
prevents the engine from running for more than two seconds unless a
valid transponder key is recognized by the ignition system.
Additionally, FCA stated that only six consecutive invalid start
attempts will be permitted and that all other attempts will be locked
out by preventing the fuel injectors from firing and disabling the
starter.
FCA stated that it expects the Jeep Wrangler vehicle line to mirror
the lower theft rate results achieved by the Jeep Grand Cherokee
vehicle line when ignition immobilizer systems were installed as
standard equipment on the line. FCA stated that it has offered the SKIS
immobilizer device as standard equipment on all Jeep Grand Cherokee
vehicles since MY 1999. According to FCA, the average theft rate for
Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles, based on NHTSA's theft rate data for the
four model years prior to 1999 (1995-1998), when a vehicle immobilizer
device was not installed as standard equipment was 5.3574 per one
thousand vehicles produced. This was significantly higher than the
1990/1991 median theft rate of 3.5826. However, FCA also indicated that
the average theft rate for the Jeep Grand Cherokee for the nine model
years (1999-2009, excluding MY 2007 and 2009) after installation of the
standard immobilizer device was 2.5704, significantly lower than the
median. The Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicle line was also granted an
exemption from the parts-marking requirements beginning with MY 2004
(67 FR 79687, December 30, 2002). FCA further exerts that NHTSA's theft
rate data for the Jeep Grand Cherokee indicates that the inclusion of a
standard immobilizer device resulted in a 52 percent net average
reduction in vehicle thefts. Theft rate data reported in the Federal
Register notices published by the agency show that the theft rate for
the Jeep Wrangler vehicle line, using an average of three MYs' data
(2012-2014) is also 0.3980, which is significantly lower than the
median theft rate established by the agency.
Based on the evidence submitted by FCA, the agency believes that
the antitheft device for the Jeep Wrangler vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR 41). The agency concludes that the device will provide
four of the five types of performance listed in 49 CFR part
543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; preventing defeat or circumvention
of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the
vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and
durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR part 543.7(b), the agency
grants a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of
part 541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that FCA has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft
[[Page 48743]]
device for the vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information FCA provided about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full FCA's
petition for exemption for its Jeep Wrangler vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with its MY
2018 Jeep Wrangler vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f)
contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all
part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future
product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is
granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary
in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines
exempted from the parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard. FCA stated that an official nameplate for the vehicle has not
yet been determined.
If FCA decides not to use the exemption for this vehicle line, it
must formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the
vehicle line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR parts 541.5 and
541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if FCA wishes in the future to modify the device
on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. 49 CFR part 543.7(d) states that a
part 543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on
which the line's exemption is based. Further, 49 CFR part 543.9(c)(2)
provides for the submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device similar to but differing from the
one specified in that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that 49 CFR
part 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and
itself. The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2017-22659 Filed 10-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P