Yokohama Tire Corporation, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance |
|---|
Topics: Yokohama
|
Otto G. Matheke III
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
21 June 2019
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29280-29281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13196]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2018-0082; Notice 1]
Yokohama Tire Corporation, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Yokohama Tire Corporation (YTC) has determined that certain
Yokohama RY023 brand replacement commercial tires do not fully comply
with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536
kilograms (10,000 lbs) and Motorcycles. YTC filed a noncompliance
report dated July 12, 2018. YTC subsequently petitioned NHTSA on July
31, 2018, and submitted a supplemental petition on February 6, 2019,
for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety. This document announces receipt of
YTC's petition.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is July 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
YTC has determined that certain Yokohama brand RY023 replacement
commercial tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(d) and (j) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic
Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms
(10,000 lbs) and Motorcycles (49 CFR 571.119). YTC filed a
noncompliance report dated July 12, 2018, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defects and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. YTC
[[Page 29281]]
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on July 31, 2018, and submitted a
supplemental petition on February 6, 2019, for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR
part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
II. Tires Involved
Approximately 4,704 Yokohama RY023 size 11R22.5 16(LR H) 146/143L
commercial tires manufactured between February 2, 2018, and May 17,
2018, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance
YTC explains that the noncompliance was due to a mold error in
which one sidewall, the serial sidewall, of subject tires incorrectly
state the ply rating, load range and load capacity as required by
paragraph S6.5(d) and (j) of FMVSS No. 119.
Specifically, the tires were marked:
14 PR LOAD RANGE G
MAX. LOAD SINGLE 2800 kg (6175 lbs) at 720 kPa (105 psi) COLD
MAX. LOAD DUAL 2650 kg (5840 lbs) at 720 kPa (105 psi) COLD
When they should have been marked:
16 PR LOAD RANGE H
MAX. LOAD SINGLE 3000 kg (6610 lbs) at 830 kPa (120 psi) COLD
MAX. LOAD DUAL 2725 kg (6005 lbs) at 830 kPa (120 psi) COLD
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S6.5(d) and (j) of FMVSS No. 119, includes the
requirements relevant to this petition:
Except as specified in paragraph S6.5, each tire shall be
marked on each sidewall with the information specified in paragraphs
(a) through (j) of paragraph S6.5.
The maximum load rating and corresponding inflation
pressure of the tire, shown as follows:
(Mark on tires rated for single and dual load): Max load single __
kg (__ lb) at __ kPa (__ psi) cold. Max load dual __ kg (__ lb) at __
kPa (__ psi) cold.
(Mark on tires rated for only for single load): Max load single __
kg (__ lb) at __ kPa (__ psi) cold.
Markings must contain the letter designating the tire load
range.
V. Summary of Petition
YTC described the subject noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle
safety.
In support of its petition, YTC submitted the following arguments:
1. This Petition concerns Yokohama 11R22.5 16PR RY023 commercial
truck and bus replacement tires whose branding information incorrectly
states the ply rating, load range and load capacity on one side (serial
side) only, while the branding information on the other side (opposite
serial side) is correct for the subject tires. Because of this mold
branding error, these tires are not in compliance with the tire
labeling requirement found in 49 CFR 571.119 S6.5(d) and (j), even
though all of these tires were manufactured with the correct ply rating
and load range.
2. YTC implemented verification countermeasures to prevent any
recurrence of any incorrect tire markings. Further investigation
determined that the suspect period ended when the incorrect mold had
been removed from production on May 17, 2018, in the 19th production
week of 2018. The 764 tires in containment will be repaired before they
are sold.
3. Significantly, these tires were manufactured as designed and
meet or exceed all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety performance
standards. While the sidewall markings are correct on the opposite
serial side, the sidewall markings on the serial side understate the
construction and capacity of the subject tires. The misbranding of
these tires is not a safety concern and also has no impact on the
retreading, repairing and recycling industries. The affected tire mold
has already been corrected and all future production will have the
correct material shown on the sidewall.
4. NHTSA has studied the impact of tire labeling information on
safety in the context of its rulemaking efforts under the
Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation
(TREAD) Act. YTC stated that NHTSA's analysis concluded that tire
construction information on a tire's sidewall is not relied upon by
dealers and consumers in the selling or purchasing of tires and has an
inconsequential impact on motor vehicle safety. In addition, YTC cited
the following petitions that the agency has previously granted for
similar noncompliances: See Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 83 FR 13002
(March 26, 2018) and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Grant of Petition for
Decision for Inconsequential Noncompliance, 82 FR 18210 (April 17,
2017).
YTC concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
YTC's complete petition and all supporting documents are available
by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at:
https://www.regulations.gov and by following the online search
instructions to locate the docket number as listed in the title of this
notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that YTC no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve tire
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after YTC
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-13196 Filed 6-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P