Hours of Service of Drivers: HEPACO, LLC; Heritage Environmental Services, LLC; Lewis Environmental, Inc.; and Moran Environmental Recovery, LLC; Application for Exemption |
|---|
|
Jim Mullen
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
12 November 2019
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61133-61134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0246]
Hours of Service of Drivers: HEPACO, LLC; Heritage Environmental
Services, LLC; Lewis Environmental, Inc.; and Moran Environmental
Recovery, LLC; Application for Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to deny the joint application
from HEPACO, LLC; Heritage Environmental Services, LLC; Lewis
Environmental, Inc.; and Moran Environmental Recovery, LLC, for
exemption from the hours-of-service (HOS) regulations for drivers
engaged in providing direct assistance in actual and potential
environmental emergencies. FMCSA analyzed the exemption application and
the public comments received in response to the Agency's August 9,
2018, notice announcing receipt of the request. The Agency has
concluded there is no basis for determining that the terms and
conditions of an exemption would achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.
DATES: This decision is effective November 12, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Telephone: (202) 366-2722; email:
MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material
to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, FMCSA-2018-0246 in the ``Keyword'' box and click
``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket Folder'' button and choose
the document to review. If you do not have access to the internet, you
may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
[[Page 61134]]
The Agency reviews the safety analyses and public comments
submitted and determines whether granting the exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The
decision of the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the
application and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons
receiving the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the
exemption is granted. The notice must specify the effective period (up
to 5 years) and explain its terms and conditions. The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
The following companies applied for this exemption: HEPACO, LLC;
Heritage Environmental Services, LLC; Lewis Environmental, Inc. and
Moran Environmental Recovery, LLC. They all are members of the Spill
Control Association of America (SCAA), which filed the exemption
application on their behalf. Together, the four companies have 758
commercial driver's license holders and 840 commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs). In responding to emergency incidents, these companies work
alongside a mix of both private industry and public agencies. Often,
their work often has a direct impact on protecting both public safety
and the environment. They are required contractually to provide direct
assistance to responsible parties who are experiencing actual or
potential environmental emergencies, defined as a sudden threat to the
public health or the well-being of the environment, arising from the
release of oil, radioactive materials, or hazardous chemicals into the
air, land or water. Their employees are hybrid driver/operator/
technicians, whose work challenges the limits on total on-duty time,
especially after hours. In addition, the applicant references the
current driver shortage and argues that obtaining drivers with the
necessary additional skills and experience is problematic.
The applicants requested relief from 49 CFR 395.3(a)(2), commonly
known as the ``14-hour rule.'' The applicants state that the HOS
limitations have always been an issue for emergency response companies.
They request this exemption to allow these four companies to respond to
a release or threat of a release of oil and other hazardous materials,
subject to the following conditions for each driver:
The on-duty period may not exceed 4.5 additional hours for
a total of 18.5 hours of non-consecutive on-duty time before the
required reset;
Driving time for drivers who exceed the 14-hour period may
not exceed 8 hours;
Driving is not permitted after 70 hours on duty in 8 days;
Drivers must take 10 hours off duty following the duty
day; and
All drivers must comply with the electronic logging device
rule.
According to the applicants, the initial response hours are the
most critical in an environmental emergency and the ability to quickly
respond is vital. These companies' drivers typically drive 1-2 hours
each way to and from the incident. In no case, would these companies'
drivers exceed 8 hours of drive time per incident. SCAA states that if
the exemption is not granted, there could be a disruption of national/
regional commerce, including delays in power restoration and protection
of interstate commerce and infrastructure.
The applicants believe that the proposed relief, and the parameters
in which their drivers operate, would continue to provide the highest
level of safety and compliance, while prudently responding to incidents
that threaten public safety and the environment. A copy of the
application for exemption is available for review in the docket for
this notice.
IV. Public Comments
On August 9, 2018, FMCSA published notice of this application and
requested public comment (83 FR 39498). The Agency received six
comments--two from spill response contractors and four from
individuals. Three individuals and both spill response contractors
support the proposed exemption.
One commenter opposed the application, stating ``[p]lease do not
allow this exemption. This is a wonderful opportunity to hire more
employees, should they need to work more than 14 hours in a day. This
has been in effect for many years, and for safety no driver should be
allowed to work more than 14 hours.''
V. FMCSA Decision
FMCSA has evaluated SCAA's application and the public comments
submitted and hereby denies the exemption. When the Agency established
the rules mandating HOS, it relied upon research indicating that the
rules improve CMV safety. These regulations put limits in place for
when and how long an individual may drive to ensure that drivers stay
awake and alert while driving and to reduce the possibility of driver
fatigue.
Based on the body of research underlying the HOS requirements,
there is no basis for granting an exemption that would allow an
individual to drive after the 18th hour of coming on duty. Although
SCAA explained that drivers would not exceed 8 hours of driving time
during a work shift, the Agency does not believe there is a basis for
concluding that the 8-hour limit on driving time offsets the potential
increase in safety risks associated with an 18.5 hour driving window.
Except for the limit on driving time, the applicants would comply
with all the other applicable HOS requirements, including using
electronic logging devices and requiring drivers to take 10 consecutive
hours off-duty at the end of the work shift. The applicants are
essentially requesting that the 14-hour rule be extended by 4.5 hours
in exchange for a 3-hour reduction in the driving time limit. The
Agency does not find this safety tradeoff to be persuasive.
The SCAA application does not analyze the safety impacts the
exemption may cause nor does it provide countermeasures to ensure that
the exemption would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or
greater than, the level that would be achieved by the current
regulations. Furthermore, the applicant did not clearly define the
conditions that would trigger the exemption.
Issued on: November 5, 2019.
Jim Mullen,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-24526 Filed 11-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P