Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance |
|---|
Topics: Mercedes-Benz GLE Class, Mercedes-Benz GLS Class
|
Otto G. Matheke III
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
30 May 2019
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25118-25119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11212]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0143; Notice 2]
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) on behalf of itself and its
parent company Daimler AG (DAG), has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2016-2017 Mercedes-Benz GLE and GLS-Class motor vehicles do not
fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer
Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less. MBUSA filed a noncompliance
information report dated December 12, 2016, and subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on December 22, 2016, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This document announces the grant of MBUSA's petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerrin Bressant, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA, telephone (202) 366-1110, facsimile (202)
366-5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: MBUSA has determined that certain MY 2016-2017
Mercedes-Benz GLE and GLS-Class motor vehicles do not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor
Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less
(49 CFR 571.110). MBUSA filed a noncompliance information report dated
December 12, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. MBUSA subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on December 22, 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)
and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance, for an exemption from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of MBUSA's petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period on April 11, 2017, in the Federal Register (82 FR
17515). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents, log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) web page at: http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online
search instruction to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2016-0143.''
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 142 of the following Mercedes-
Benz GLE and GLS-Class motor vehicles manufactured on June 14 and June
15, 2016, are potentially involved:
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE300d 4Matic
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE350
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE350 4Matic
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE400 4Matic
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE550e 4Matic
2016 Mercedes-Benz GLE63S AMG 4Matic
2017 Mercedes-Benz GL450 4Matic
2017 Mercedes-Benz GL550 4Matic
III. Noncompliance: MBUSA explains that the noncompliance is that
the tire information placard affixed to the driver's side B-pillar on
the subject vehicles was improperly printed and therefore does not meet
the requirements of paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110. Specifically, the
column identifying whether the tire is front, rear, or spare might not
be completely legible.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 includes the
requirements relevant to this petition:
Each vehicle, except for a trailer or incomplete vehicle
shall show the information specified in paragraph S4.3 (a) through (g),
and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the information specified
in paragraph S4.3 (h) and (i), on a placard permanently affixed to the
driver's side B-pillar.
This information shall be in the English language and
conform in color and format, not including the border surrounding the
entire placard, as shown in the example set forth in Figure 1 of FMVSS
No. 110:
(c) Vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold tire inflation pressure
for front, rear and spare tires.
(d) Tire size designation, indicated by the headings ``size'' or
``original tire
[[Page 25119]]
size'' or ``original size'' and ``spare tire'' or ``spare,'' for the
tires installed at the time of first purchase for purposes other than
resale.
V. Summary of MBUSA's Petition: MBUSA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MBUSA submitted the following
reasoning:
1. The row names ``front/rear/spare'' might not be completely
legible, but the tire dimensions and pressure values are legible and
correct.
2. The data, including the ``front/rear/spare'' designations, is
also available on the tank flap to the gas tank (also referred to as
the ``filler flap'').
3. After identifying the potentially noncompliant B-pillar tire
information placards, DAG analyzed potential technical implications,
specifically with respect to the requirements of FMVSS No. 110, and did
not identify any technical implications since the label remains
substantially legible and the same information is provided elsewhere on
the vehicle.
4. MBUSA has received neither customer complaints nor information
about any accidents or injuries alleged to have occurred as a result of
this noncompliance.
5. DAG has correct labels in production as of June 15, 2016.
MBUSA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
VI. NHTSA's Analysis: MBUSA explained that the noncompliance is
that the subject vehicles are equipped with an FMVSS No. 110 tire and
information vehicle placard which isn't properly printed. FMVSS No. 110
requires that the vehicle placard identify the installed tire sizes and
recommended inflation pressures for each vehicle axle (i.e. front and
rear) and the size of the spare tire, if equipped. The axle and spare
tire identification labeling on the affected vehicles is not completely
legible, however, the given tire dimensions and inflation pressure
values on the label are correct.
Assuming a worst-case scenario where the axle and spare tire
identification information (i.e., front, rear and spare) were totally
missing, the vehicle operator could inadvertently be misguided to the
incorrect inflation pressure for the tires installed on each axle and
the spare tire. The operator could easily identify the tire size by
visually looking at the tires fitted to each axle and the spare tire.
By comparing the actual tire sizes to the information on the vehicle
placard, the spare tire could be easily differentiated from the tires
mounted on the axles because of its much smaller size. The same tire
size is used on both the front and rear axles. The vehicle placards on
the subject vehicles recommend 41-45 psi for the front axle and 44-51
psi for the rear axle, depending on the model type. The concern is that
the vehicle placards list two different inflation pressures for the
tires mounted on the vehicles, but does not properly identify what
pressure is for the front axle and which is for the rear axle.
FMVSS No. 110 requires the tires, at the recommended inflation
pressures, be appropriate for the vehicle's gross axle weight ratings
(GAWRs). The agency evaluated the affected vehicles against this FMVSS
No. 110 requirement and in the unlikely event that the operator
``guessed'' incorrectly or simply opted to inflate all four tires to
the lowest stated pressure, the tires would be appropriate for the
vehicle's GAWRs. Information provided by the ETRTO (European Tire and
Rim Technical Organization) validates that at the lower pressures, the
tires on the subject vehicles, are adequate to handle maximum vehicle
loads.
In further communications regarding this petition, MBUSA mentioned
that the subject vehicles are also equipped with gas tank flap labels
that provide the recommended inflation pressures for the tires and
corresponding axles. The gas tank flap label clearly states what
inflation pressures should be used for each axle. Upon evaluation of
the information provided on the gas tank flap labels, the agency noted
that some of the pressures are exactly the same as those specified on
the vehicle placard label discussed above, however, on many of the
vehicles the pressures on both axles are 4 psi less than those listed
on the vehicle placard. The agency conducted a second evaluation to see
if the tires on the subject vehicles, at the lower gas tank flap
labeled inflation pressures, would still be appropriate for the
respective vehicle GAWRs in accordance with the requirements of FMVSS
No. 110. The agency determined that the tires on the subject vehicles,
at the inflation pressures stated on the alternative gas tank flap
labels, would still be appropriate for the respective vehicle's GAWRs.
The agency also considered the safety implications of providing a
partially legible FMVSS No. 110 vehicle placard on the subject
vehicles. Vehicle placards are typically referenced by vehicle
operators and relay important information pertaining to tire and
loading information. As MBUSA mentioned, the labels on the subject
vehicles are substantially legible and clearly provide the vehicle
capacity weight, seating capacity and position, as well as the tire
sizes with corresponding recommended tire inflation pressures. These
labels also recommend that the owner's manual can be referenced for
further information. The tire related information that may not be
legible can be readily found in other locations (i.e. gas tank filler
flap, tire sidewall, and owner's manual).
VII. NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has
decided that MBUSA has met its burden of persuasion that the subject
noncompliance with FMVSS No. 110 is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety. Accordingly, NHTSA hereby grants MBUSA's petition. MBUSA is
therefore exempted from the obligation of providing notification of and
free remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 AND 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject vehicles that MBUSA no longer controlled at
the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their control after MBUSA notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-11212 Filed 5-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P