Daimler Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance |
|---|
Topics: Freightliner Cascadia
|
Otto G. Matheke III
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
27 February 2020
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11450-11452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03960]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0008; Notice 1]
Daimler Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Daimler Trucks North America (DTNA) has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2017-2019 Freightliner Cascadia motor vehicles
do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. DTNA
filed a noncompliance report dated January 16, 2019. DTNA subsequently
petitioned NHTSA on February 8, 2019, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This document announces receipt of DTNA's petition.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is March 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket number and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and considered. All comments and supporting materials received
after the closing date will also be filed and considered to the fullest
extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, a notice of the decision
will also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting
[[Page 11451]]
materials submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: DTNA has determined that certain MY 2017-2019
Freightliner Cascadia motor vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph
S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated
Equipment. (49 CFR 571.108). DTNA filed a noncompliance report dated
January 16, 2019, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. DTNA subsequently petitioned NHTSA on
February 8, 2019, for an exemption from the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
This notice of receipt of DTNA petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120, and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercises of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Trucks Involved: Approximately 74,675 MY 2017-2019 Freightliner
Cascadia motor vehicles, manufactured between May 3, 2016, and December
17, 2018, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance: DTNA stated that the noncompliance is that the
subject vehicles are equipped with brake lights that illuminate when
the low air warning light illuminates and therefore, does not meet the
requirements specified in paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108.
IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108, includes
the requirements relevant to this petition. No additional lamp,
reflective device, or other motor vehicle equipment is permitted to be
installed that impairs the effectiveness of lighting equipment required
by FMVSS No. 108.
V. Summary of DTNA's Petition: The following views and arguments
presented in this section, V. Summary of DTNA's Petition, are the views
and arguments provided by DTNA. They have not been evaluated by the
agency and do not reflect the views of the agency.
DTNA described the subject noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle
safety.
DTNA submitted the following background information on how their
air brake system affects the stop lamps:
DTNA's air brake system is comprised of two brake systems, primary
and secondary. The primary system controls the service brakes on the
drive axles and the secondary system controls the service brakes on the
steer axle, and the higher pressure of these two control the trailer
service brakes. These two systems are isolated from each other so that
if there is an air loss in one system, the other system will still be
functional to control the vehicle service brakes. When either one of
the systems drops below 70 psi, the low air warning indicator light on
the dash turns ON and the brake lights illuminate. It does not mean
that the drive axle parking brakes are starting to apply. The air that
holds off the drive axle parking brakes, is the higher of either
primary or secondary air. Therefore, if the primary falls below 70 psi,
the indicator light and brake lights illuminates, but the parking
brakes do not start to drag since the secondary air (presumably
unaffected) still remains high and holds off the parking springs. In
the same manner, the trailer parking brakes are held off by the higher
of either primary or secondary air. Only when both air systems drop
below about 70 psi will the trailer parking brakes begin to apply.
DTNA submitted the following views and arguments in support of the
petition:
1. The normal operating air pressure of the vehicle is between 110
and 130 PSI. There is a regulator that turns on the air compressor if
the air pressure is below 110 PSI and turns off the air compressor when
the system pressure is above 130 PSI. If the air pressure begins to
drop and reaches approximately 70 PSI the air system pressure is not
adequate to maintain optimum operation, a warning signal illuminates on
the dash and buzzer activates to alert the driver to this condition. On
these vehicles, the brake lights illuminate when the warning signal
illuminates on the dash. The events contributing to a low air condition
after initial vehicle startup are rare and are not expected in normal
operation. If the condition was to occur during operation, the driver
would be alerted to the circumstances with audible and visual low air
warning and would be expected to apply the service brakes and pull over
in a safe manner. Additionally, if the pressure in both air systems
drops below 70 psi, the parking brakes will slowly begin to apply.
2. The Freightliner Cascadia Driver's Manual states ``If the low
air pressure warning is activated, check the air pressure gauges to
determine which system has low air pressure. Although the vehicle's
speed can be reduced using the foot brake control pedal, either the
front or rear service brakes will not be operating at full capacity,
causing a longer stopping distance. Bring the vehicle to a safe stop
and have the air system repaired before continuing.''
3. Brakes are commonly applied--causing the brake lights to
illuminate--when a driver sees a vehicle display warning or senses that
the vehicle is experiencing a problem. Reducing vehicle speed in
relation to a vehicle operational problem increases safety, providing
following drivers the opportunity to increase the following distance.
Low air warning would likely cause the vehicle driver to immediately
engage the brake system and bring the vehicle to a safe stop. Brake
light illumination for a brake system low air event would help provide
early warning to following drivers to slow down.
4. DTNA stated, in ``Motorcoach Brake Systems and Safety
Technologies,'' Federal Motor Carrier Administration issued guidance,
while directed toward Motorcoach drivers, that supports the expectation
that a driver, upon receipt of a low-pressure warning, would apply
brakes and pull off the roadway. FMCSA stated: ``Low Pressure Warning--
In most cases, you should notice an air leak or malfunction before
getting a low-pressure warning; however, when a low-pressure warning
occurs, immediately bring the motorcoach to a safe stop, off of the
roadway. Continuing to operate the motorcoach could result in an
automatic application of the park brakes, possibly leading to a loss of
control or a stop in an unsafe position.''
5. DTNA is not aware of any accidents, injuries, owner complaints
or field reports related to this condition on the subject vehicles.
6. DTNA also stated that NHTSA has previously granted petitions for
decisions of inconsequential noncompliance for lighting requirements
where technical noncompliance exists, but does not create a negative
impact on safety:
In Docket No. 66 FR 32871 (June 18, 2001) a Petition for
inconsequentiality by GM was granted by NHTSA. In this instance,
certain models could have unintended CHMSL illumination briefly if the
hazard warning lamp switch is depressed to its limit of travel. NHTSA
[[Page 11452]]
stated: ``The intended use of a hazard warning lamp and the momentary
activation of a CHMSL do not provide a conflicting message. The
illumination of the CHMSL is intended to signify that the vehicle's
brakes are being applied and that the vehicle might be decelerating.
Hazard warning lamps are intended as a more general message to nearby
drivers that extra attention should be given to the vehicle. A brief
illumination of the CHMSL while activating the hazard warning lamps
would not confuse the intended general message, nor would the brief
illumination in the absence of the other brake lamps cause confusion
that the brakes were unintentionally applied.''
In Docket No. 83 FR 7847 (Feb 22, 2018) a Petition for
inconsequentiality by GM was granted by NHTSA. In this instance, under
certain conditions, the parking lamps on the subject vehicles fail to
meet the requirement that parking lamps must be activated when
headlamps are activated in a steady burning state. NHTSA stated: ``. .
. The Agency agrees with GM that in this case, this situation would
have a low probability of occurrence and, if it should occur, it would
neither be long-lasting nor likely to occur during a period when
parking lamps are generally in use. Importantly, when the noncompliance
does occur, other lamps remain functional. The combination of all of
the factors, specific to this case, abate the risk to safety.''
In Docket No. 64 FR 62609 (Sept. 02, 1999) a Petition for
inconsequentiality by GM was granted by NHTSA. In this instance, a
certain model equipped with an electronic turn signal was affected by
random inputs that cause the internal timing of the electronic circuit
to become unsynchronized causing the left front turn signal lamp to
flash at a rapid rate while the left rear turn signal lamp illuminates
but does not flash. These conditions can continue after the turn signal
lever automatically returns to the off position. NHTSA stated: ``We
have concluded that the few vehicles affected by this noncompliance, as
well as the fact that the turn signals show the driver that they have
failed, warrant a finding that this noncompliance is inconsequential
with regard to motor vehicle safety.''
7. DTNA believes that a technical non-compliance exists, but does
not create a negative impact on safety when the brake lamps illuminate
during a brake system low air warning event. The brake light
illumination serves to emphasize the message to following drivers that
the vehicle is experiencing trouble and they should pay close
attention. The Brake Air warning indicator light, on the driver's
display panel, shows the driver that there is an issue with the air
brake system. This would result in the driver bringing the vehicle to a
safe stop and having the air system repaired before continuing.
DTNA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that DTNA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after DTNA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority
49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-03960 Filed 2-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P