Air Plan Approval; Kansas; Removal of Kansas City, Kansas Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel Requirement |
|---|
|
James Gulliford
Environmental Protection Agency
19 January 2021
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5088-5091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00179]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0711; FRL-10019-24-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Kansas; Removal of Kansas City, Kansas Reid
Vapor Pressure Fuel Requirement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of revision to the Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP),
submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and the Environment (KDHE)
on December 9, 2020. The proposed revision removes the Kansas City,
Kansas seven pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) Fuel
requirement which required gasoline sold in the Kansas City, Kansas
area to have a seven pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure from
June 1 to September 15. The rest of the state is subject to the Clean
Air Act (CAA) nine pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure from June
1 to September 15. If approved the Kansas City, Kansas area would be
subject to the Clean Air Act Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel requirement. In
addition, EPA anticipates issuing a separate proposal for the Missouri
side of the Kansas City metro area.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0711 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jed Wolkins, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-7588;
email address: wolkins.jed@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. Background
V. What is the EPA's analysis of Kansas' SIP request?
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
VII. Incorporation by Reference
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0711, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Kansas SIP,
submitted by the KDHE on December 9, 2020. The proposed revision
removes the Kansas City, Kansas; Johnson and Wyandotte Counties; 7.0
Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) Fuel requirement. The approved SIP, K.A.R.
28-19-719, requires gasoline sold in the two counties to have a RVP of
seven pounds per square inch (psi) or less from June 1 through
September 15.\1\ If the SIP revision is approved, the Kansas City,
Kansas area would be subject to the CAA RVP requirement of nine psi or
less from June 1 through September 15.\2\ Kansas has asked EPA to
remove K.A.R. 28-19-719 Fuel Volatility from the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Kansas rule allows an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
\2\ The CAA allows an additional one psi for gasoline containing
up to 15% ethanol.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from August 27, 2020
to November 4, 2020 and received eight comments. Kansas adequately
responded to all eight comments, as noted in the State submission
included in the docket for this action, but did not make any changes to
the removal based on the comments received.
In addition, as explained below, the revision meets the substantive
SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.
IV. Background
The EPA established a 1-hour ozone NAAQS in 1971.\3\ 36 FR 8186
(April 30, 1971). On March 3, 1978, the EPA designated Johnson and
Wyandotte counties (hereinafter referred to in this document as the
``Kanas City area'') in nonattainment of the 1971 1-hour ozone
[[Page 5089]]
NAAQS, as required by the CAA Amendments of 1977. 43 FR 8996 (March 3,
1978). On February 8, 1979, the EPA revised the 1-hour ozone NAAQS,
referred to as the 1979 ozone NAAQS. 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The 1-hour ozone NAAQS was originally promulgated as a
photochemical oxidant standard. See 36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971). In
1979, the EPA substituted the word ``ozone'' for ``photochemical
oxidant''. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). In doing so, the EPA
stated that ``(t)he intent of the standard (total-oxidant
reduction), the control strategies, and the index of progress toward
attainment (measured ozone levels) remain unchanged.'' Id. at 8203.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA redesignated the Kansas City area to attainment of the 1979
1-hour ozone standard and approved the ozone maintenance plan on July
23, 1992. 57 FR 27936 (June 23, 1992). Pursuant to section 175A of the
CAA, the first 10-year maintenance period for the 1-hour ozone standard
began on July 23, 1992, the effective date of the redesignation
approval.
In 1995, the Kansas City area violated the 1979 1-hour ozone
standard. Kansas revised the control strategy and contingency measures
in the maintenance plan, which was approved on December 30, 2002. 67 FR
66058 (October 30, 2002). The revised control strategy included K.A.R.
28-19-719, Fuel Volatility.
On May 2, 1997, Kansas adopted the seven and two tenths (7.2)
pounds per square inch (psi) Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) limit from June
1 to September 15.\4\ EPA approved this rule into the SIP on July 7,
1997. 62 FR 36212 (July 7, 1997). Following a violation of the ozone
standard for the three-year period of 1995-1997, on April 3, 2001,
Kansas revised the rule to seven (7.0) psi limit from June 1 to
September 15.\5\ EPA approved this rule into the SIP on February 13,
2002. 67 FR 6655 (February 13, 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Kansas rule allowed an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol. See 62 FR 36212 (July 7, 1997).
\5\ The Kansas rule allows an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol. See 67 FR 6655 (February 13, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 30, 2004, the EPA published a final rule in the Federal
Register stating the 1979 ozone NAAQS would no longer apply (i.e.,
would be revoked) for an area one year after the effective date of the
area's designation for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 69 FR 23951 (April 30,
2004). The Kansas City Area was designated as an unclassifiable area
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective June 15, 2004. See id.
However, on May 3, 2005, EPA published a final rule designating the
Kansas City area as an attainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
based on new monitoring data. See 70 FR 22801 (May 3, 2005). The
effective date of the revocation of the 1979 1-hour ozone standard for
the Kansas City area was June 15, 2005. See 70 FR 44470 (August 3,
2005). Kansas achieved the required maintenance of the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard in 2014.
On, December 9, 2020, Kansas requested that the EPA remove K.A.R.
28-19-719 from the SIP. Section 110(l) of the CAA prohibits EPA from
approving a SIP revision that interferes with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
(RFP), or any other applicable requirement of the CAA.
V. What is the EPA's analysis of Kansas' SIP request
EPA is making the preliminary determination that the ozone NAAQS is
the primary focus for the noninterference demonstration required by
section 110(l) of the CAA because the RVP requirements results
primarily in emissions benefits for VOCs and NOX. VOCs and
NOX emissions are precursors for ozone. NOX
emissions are precursors for particulate matter. NO2 is a
component of NOX. There are no emissions reductions
attributable to the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), lead and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) from RVP requirements.
In Kansas' December 9, 2020 submission the State provided a
technical demonstration to support the request to remove Kansas' 7.0
psi RVP requirement from the active measures portions of the Kansas
SIP. In that technical demonstration, Kansas provided Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator (MOVES) results, modeling the emissions of VOCs and
NOX associated with changing the high ozone season RVP
requirements from the state-level requirement of 7.0 psi to the federal
requirement of 9.0 psi. EPA evaluated the state's assumptions and
inputs used in MOVES, and EPA finds the state analysis is appropriate.
Specifically, KDHE compared what the projected emissions in the year
2020 (the year the program is requested to be rescinded) would be,
assuming a RVP level of 7.0 psi and 9.0 psi, respectively, in two
separate modeling simulations. The comparison revealed an increase in
emissions of 0.07 tons for NOX and 0.37 tons for VOC, per
ozone season day, would result from the change to the federal
requirement from June 1 through September 15. While the modeling showed
a slight increase in NOX and VOC emissions resulting from
the use of 9.0 psi RVP as opposed to 7.0 psi, the most appropriate
analysis is whether emissions in the future years would increase and
potentially interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS. The State compared
actual emissions from 2017 using a RVP of 7.0 psi to emissions modelled
for the years 2020 using a RVP of 9.0 psi. Table 1 below provides the
results of this analysis.
Table 1--Comparative Emissions for Change to RVP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decrease in 2020
9.0 psi RVP
2017 7.0 psi RVP 2020 7.0 psi RVP 2020 9.0 psi RVP compared to 2017
(tons per ozone (tons per ozone (tons per ozone 7.0 psi RVP
season day) season day) season day) (tons per ozone
season day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX................................. 29.42 22.42 22.49 6.93
VOC................................. 19.26 16.88 17.25 2.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Table 1 indicates, NOX and VOC emissions in the
Kansas City Area would decrease from 2017 to 2020, even with the
increase due to ozone season fuel RVP of 9.0 psi. The modeling
demonstration shows the slight increase in emissions is being mitigated
area-wide by a steady decrease in tailpipe emissions. This is the
result of a cleaner new vehicle fleet replacing the older fleet \6\ and
the decrease in the sulfur content in gasoline as required by EPA's
Tier 3 motor vehicle emission and fuel standards, which were
implemented beginning on January 1, 2017.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As vehicle owners purchase new vehicles, the older vehicles
slowly are removed from the vehicles on the road. A used vehicle
maybe purchased and driven by several owners, but eventually the
older, more polluting vehicles are removed from the road.
Manufacturers' fleets in 1994 are allowed 0.6 gram/mile
NOX emissions. Manufacturers' fleets in 2004 are allowed
0.07 gram/mile NoX emissions. Manufacturers' fleets in
2025 will be allowed 0.03 gram/mile NOX emissions.
\7\ Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor
Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards (See 79 FR 23414, April 28,
2014.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 5090]]
The Kansas City, Kansas area is designated attainment/
unclassifiable or attainment for the 1979, 1997, 2008, and 2015 ozone
standards. While the 1979 maintenance plan is approved into the SIP,
the 1979 NAAQS has been revoked for the Kansas City area. There are no
other ozone maintenance plans for the Kansas City area in the SIP. The
highest monitor design value in the Kansas City area is 68 parts per
billion (ppb), which is below the 2015 ozone NAAQS of 70 ppb.\8\ Based
on the state's modeling analysis, along with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination that the slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions resulting from the use of 9.0 psi RVP
fuel will not interfere with the Kansas City area's ability to maintain
the ozone NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement. The EPA is making
this determination based on MOVES modeling that indicates that on-road
VOC and NOX emissions in 2020 with gasoline meeting the 9.0
psi RVP requirement remain below the emissions levels in 2017, a year
in which the area's design value was also below the 2015 ozone standard
of 70 ppb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Based on the most recent quality assured data design values
(2017-2019). The monitor in question is on the Missouri side of the
Kansas City. The highest 4th high value on the Kansas side of Kansas
City was 62 ppb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Kansas City area is designated as attainment or unclassifiable
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5, 2012 annual PM2.5,
1971 annual NO2, and 2010 1-hour NO2 standards.
There are no maintenance plans for any of these standards. The highest
PM2.5 design value is 79% of the standard. The highest
NO2 design value is 42% of the standard. As discussed above
the area has a decrease from 2017 to 2020 NOX and VOC
emissions. Based on this data together with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination that the slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions in 2020 and the downward trend in on-
road VOC and NOX emissions resulting from this change will
not interfere with the Area's ability to maintain the any
PM2.5 or NO2 NAAQS, or any other applicable
requirement.
The Kansas City area is designated as attainment or unclassifiable
for the SO2 standards. There are no maintenance plans for
any of these standards. The most recent (2017-2019) highest
SO2 design value is less than 8% of the standard. The RVP
standard has no effect on SO2 emissions. Based on this data
together with air quality data, EPA is making the preliminary
determination that the change will not interfere with the Area's
ability to attain or maintain the SO2 NAAQS, or any other
applicable requirement.
The Kansas City area is designated as attainment or unclassifiable
for the CO and lead standards. There are no maintenance plans for any
of these standards. The highest CO design value is less than 18% of the
standard. There is no lead monitoring in the area. The RVP standard has
no effect on CO or lead emissions. Based on this data together with air
quality data, EPA is making the preliminary determination that the
change will not interfere with the area's ability to maintain the CO or
lead NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement.
Kansas has no federal Class I areas. EPA is making the preliminary
determination that the small emission increase will not interfere with
reasonable progress towards natural visibility in surrounding states
Class I areas that Kansas might impact due to the small magnitude of
emissions increase.
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
We are proposing to approve Kansas' removal of the state RVP
requirement from the SIP for the Kansas City, Kansas area. As discussed
above the removal of the RVP requirement will not affect the area's
ability to attain or maintain any air quality standard. We are
processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments
on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
VII. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to amend regulatory text
that includes incorporation by reference. As described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below, the EPA is proposing to
remove provisions of the EPA-Approved Kansas Regulations from the
Kansas State Implementation Plan, which is incorporated by reference in
accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
[[Page 5091]]
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 21, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart R--Kansas
Sec. 52.870 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 52.870, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by removing
the entry ``K.A.R. 28-19-719'' under the heading ``Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions''.
0
3. In Sec. 52.873, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.873 Approval status.
(a) Kansas rule K.A.R. 28-19-719 was rescinded on February 18,
2021.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-00179 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P