Petition for Exemption from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; North American Subaru, INC. |
|---|
Topics: Toyota GR86
|
Raymond R. Posten
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
12 May 2021
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26140-26143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09981]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; North American Subaru, INC.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the North American Subaru, Inc.'s
(Subaru) petition for exemption from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (theft prevention standard) for its Toyota GR 86
vehicle line beginning in model year (MY) 2022. The petition is granted
because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be
placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard. Subaru
also requested confidential treatment for specific information in its
petition. Therefore, no confidential information provided for purposes
of this notice has been disclosed.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2022 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-439, NRM-310, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is
(202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 331, the Secretary
of Transportation (and the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) by delegation) is required to promulgate a theft
prevention standard to provide for the identification of certain motor
vehicles and their major replacement parts to impede motor vehicle
theft. NHTSA promulgated regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require parts-marking for specified passenger
motor vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106,
manufacturers that are subject to the parts-marking requirements may
petition NHTSA, by delegation, for an exemption for a line of passenger
motor vehicles equipped with an antitheft device as standard equipment
that NHTSA decides is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements. In accordance with this statute, NHTSA promulgated 49 CFR
part 543, which establishes the process through which manufacturers may
seek an exemption from the theft prevention standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may petition NHTSA for an exemption
of one vehicle line per model year. Among other requirements,
manufacturers must identify whether the exemption is sought under
section 543.6 or section 543.7. Under section 543.6, a manufacturer may
request an exemption by providing specific information about the
antitheft device, its capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner
believes the device to be as effective at reducing and deterring theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements. Section
[[Page 26141]]
543.7 permits a manufacturer to request an exemption under a more
streamlined process if the vehicle line is equipped with an antitheft
device (an ``immobilizer'') as standard equipment that complies with
one of the standards specified in that section.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer must include a
statement that their entire vehicle line is equipped with an
immobilizer that meets one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8 through 21) of
C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention (in
effect March 30, 2011), as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC-S338-98, Automobile
Theft Deterrent Equipment and Systems: Electronic Immobilization
(May 1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97), Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval
of Vehicle Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with Regard to
Their Alarm System (AS) in effect August 8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116), Uniform Technical
Prescriptions Concerning the Protection of Motor Vehicles Against
Unauthorized Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 543.8 establishes requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention standard. As stated in section
543.8(a), NHTSA processes any complete exemption petition. If NHTSA
receives an incomplete petition, NHTSA will notify the petitioner of
the deficiencies. Once NHTSA receives a complete petition the agency
will process it and, in accordance with section 543.8(b), will grant
the petition if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to issue its decision either to
grant or to deny an exemption petition not later than 120 days after
the date on which a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA does not make
a decision within the 120-day period, the petition shall be deemed to
be approved and the manufacturer shall be exempt from the standard for
the line covered by the petition for the subsequent model year.\2\
Exemptions granted under part 543 apply only to the vehicle line or
lines that are subject to the grant and that are equipped with the
antitheft device on which the line's exemption was based, and are
effective for the model year beginning after the model year in which
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption, unless the notice of exemption
specifies a later year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the manner in which NHTSA's
decisions on petitions are to be made known. Under section 543.8(f), if
the petition is sought under section 543.6, NHTSA publishes a notice of
its decision to grant or deny the exemption petition in the Federal
Register and notifies the petitioner in writing. Under section
543.8(g), if the petition is sought under section 543.7, NHTSA notifies
the petitioner in writing of the agency's decision to grant or deny the
exemption petition.
This grant of petition for exemption considers North American
Subaru, Inc.'s (Subaru) petition for its Toyota GR 86 vehicle line
beginning in MY 2022. Subaru is the manufacturer of the Toyota GR 86
vehicle line as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32101(5), and is the manufacturer
of the vehicle line as indicated on the label required by 49 CFR part
567. Accordingly, NHTSA determined that Subaru can use its one
exemption request per model year for the Toyota GR 86 vehicle line
beginning in MY 2022.
Subaru's petition is granted under 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR
543.8(c), which state that if the Secretary of Transportation (NHTSA,
by delegation) does not make a decision about a petition within 120
days of the petition submission, the petition shall be deemed to be
approved and the manufacturer shall be exempt from the standard for the
line covered by the petition for the subsequent model year. Separately,
based on the information provided in Subaru's petition, NHTSA has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on its vehicle line
as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention standard.
I. Specific Petition Content Requirements Under 49 CFR 543.6
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention, Subaru petitioned for an exemption for its specified
vehicle line from the parts-marking requirements of the theft
prevention standard, beginning in MY 2022. Subaru petitioned under 49
CFR 543.6, Petition: Specific content requirements, which, as described
above, requires manufacturers to provide specific information about the
antitheft device installed as standard equipment on all vehicles in the
line for which an exemption is sought, the antitheft device's
capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner believes the device to be
as effective at reducing and deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements.
More specifically, section 543.6(a)(1) requires petitions to
include a statement that an antitheft device will be installed as
standard equipment on all vehicles in the line for which the exemption
is sought. Under section 543.6(a)(2), each petition must list each
component in the antitheft system, and include a diagram showing the
location of each of those components within the vehicle. As required by
section 543.6(a)(3), each petition must include an explanation of the
means and process by which the device is activated and functions,
including any aspect of the device designed to: (1) Facilitate or
encourage its activation by motorists; (2) attract attention to the
efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a vehicle by means
other than a key; (3) prevent defeating or circumventing the device by
an unauthorized person attempting to enter a vehicle by means other
than a key; (4) prevent the operation of a vehicle which an
unauthorized person has entered using means other than a key; and (5)
ensure the reliability and durability of the device.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to providing information about the antitheft device and
its functionality, petitioners must also submit the reasons for their
belief that the antitheft device will be effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft, including any theft data and other data
that are available to the petitioner and form a basis for that
belief,\4\ and the reasons for their belief that the agency should
determine that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541 in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft. In support of this belief, the
petitioners should include any statistical data that are available to
the petitioner and form the basis for the petitioner's belief that a
line of passenger motor vehicles equipped with the antitheft device is
likely to have a theft rate equal to or less than that of passenger
motor vehicles of the same, or a similar, line which have parts marked
in compliance with part 541.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(4).
\5\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following sections describe Subaru's petition information
provided pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention. To the extent that specific information in Subaru's
petition is subject to a properly filed confidentiality request, that
information was not disclosed as part of this notice.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 49 CFR 512.20(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26142]]
II. Subaru's Petition for Exemption
In a petition dated November 11, 2020, Subaru requested an
exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention
standard for the Toyota GR 86 vehicle line beginning with MY 2022.
In its petition, Subaru provided a detailed description and diagram
of the identity, design, and location of the components of the
antitheft device for the Toyota GR 86 vehicle line. Subaru stated that
its MY 2022 Toyota GR 86 vehicle line will be installed with an engine
immobilizer device as standard equipment, as required by 543.6(a)(1).
Subaru also stated it will offer a ``Smart Key'' system on all trim
lines, which includes keyless access and push start functions.
Specifically, key components of the ``smart entry'' system will include
a keyless access engine control unit (ECU), steering lock ECU, engine
ECU, an interior antenna, push button ignition switch, and an access
key. Subaru also stated that there is a diagnosis tool used to perform
a key ID code registration to the immobilizer module. Subaru stated
that its antitheft device will also include an alarm system as standard
equipment. Subaru stated that its alarm system will monitor door status
and key ID, and opening of a door or hood will activate the alarm
system. Subaru further stated that visual and audio features will
attract attention to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or
move the vehicle by sounding the vehicle's horn and illuminating the 4-
way flashing hazard lamps.
Pursuant to section 543.6(a)(3), Subaru explained the means and
process by which the immobilizer device is activated and functions.
Subaru stated that its antitheft system and immobilization features are
designed and constructed within the vehicle's overall CAN (controller
area network) electrical architecture which means the antitheft system
cannot be separated by rerouting or tapping into particular wires or
connectors. Subaru further stated that the immobilization features will
prevent operation of the vehicle by preventing the starting or
operation of the engine even if an unauthorized person was to gain
entry into the vehicle.
Subaru stated that its Toyota GR 86 ``smart key'' system is
activated when the ignition is at the ``OFF'' position or the door is
opened/closed while propulsion system is off and ignition is at the
``ON'' or ``ACC'' position. Deactivation occurs after the driver gets
in the vehicle with the access key and pushes the button ignition
switch while pressing the brake pedal, random codes are then
transmitted to the access key from the keyless access ECU through the
interior antenna. Once the access key receives the signal, it returns
the encrypted code. When pushing the push button ignition switch once
again, the power is turned off and the security indicator lamp blinks.
Subaru stated that this method of activation will facilitate and
encourage its activation by motorists because it requires nothing more
than the removal of the key from the ignition switch when the vehicle
is not being used.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v), Subaru provided information
on the reliability and durability of its proposed device. To ensure
reliability and durability of the device, Subaru conducted tests based
on its own specified standards and provided a detailed list of the
tests conducted. Subaru stated that it believes that its device is
reliable and durable because it complied with its own specific design
standards and the antitheft device is installed on other vehicle lines
for which the agency has granted a parts-marking exemption.
Subaru stated that its theft rates have been low per the National
Insurance Crime Bureau's 2019 report on America's 10 most stolen
vehicles. However, Subaru compared its proposed device to other Subaru
antitheft devices that NHTSA has determined to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. Specifically, Subaru stated that the theft
rate of the MY 2008 Impreza (not parts marked, standard engine
immobilizer) decreased by almost 51% as compared to the MY 2007 Impreza
(parts marked with optional engine immobilizer). Subaru stated that the
antitheft system included on the Toyota GR 86 vehicle line is the same
system employed on the Subaru Ascent car line, for which NHTSA
determined that the system was likely as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention standard.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 82 FR 57650 (Dec. 06, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subaru also stated that the National Crime Information Center's
(NCIC) theft data showed that there was a 70% reduction in theft
experienced when comparing the MY 1987 Ford Mustang vehicle thefts
(with immobilizers) to MY 1995 Ford Mustang vehicle thefts (without
immobilizers). On the basis of the above and other cited comparisons,
Subaru has concluded that its proposed immobilizer system is no less
effective than those devices installed on lines for which NHTSA has
already granted full exemptions.
III. Decision to Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.8(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541 or if deemed
approved under 49 U.S.C. 33106(d). As discussed above, in this case,
Subaru's petition is granted under 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
However, separately, NHTSA also finds that Subaru has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the antitheft device for its
vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements
of the theft prevention standard. This conclusion is based on the
information Subaru provided about its antitheft device. NHTSA believes,
based on Subaru's supporting evidence, that the antitheft device
described for its vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention standard.
The agency concludes that Subaru's antitheft device will provide
the five types of performance features listed in section 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attracting attention to the efforts of
unauthorized persons to enter or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the theft prevention standard for a
given model year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-
marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
[[Page 26143]]
If Subaru decides not to use the exemption for its requested
vehicle line, the manufacturer must formally notify the agency. If such
a decision is made, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if a manufacturer to which an exemption has been
granted wishes in the future to modify the device on which the
exemption is based, the company may have to submit a petition to modify
the exemption. Section 543.8(d) states that a part 543 exemption
applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part
and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's exemption is
based. Further, section 543.10(c)(2) provides for the submission of
petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft
device similar to but differing from the one specified in the
exemption.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that
section 543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers
and itself. The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to
require the submission of a modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an antitheft device. The significance
of many such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if a manufacturer with an exemption contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis,
it should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby announces a grant in
full of Subaru's petition for exemption for the Toyota GR 86 vehicle
line from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning
with its MY 2022 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2021-09981 Filed 5-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P