|
|---|
Topic: CAR Group
|
| Agency: Federal Trade Commission
Date: 6 November 2017 |
The case concerns an ordinance enacted by the city of Seattle that permits independent for-hire drivers to collectively negotiate their contracts with taxicab associations, and transportation network companies such as Uber and Lyft. The Chamber of Commerce sued the city in federal district court, alleging that the ordinance violates the Sherman Act by authorizing price fixing. The district court dismissed the Sherman Act claim on the basis of the state action doctrine, and the Chamber of Commerce appealed.
The amicus brief urges the court to reject the state action doctrine in this case, because the general Washington State statutes delegating authority to municipalities to regulate for-hire transportation services do not clearly express a legislative intention to displace competition in the markets at issue in the case. “Competition is the lynchpin of the U.S. economy. Although states can displace competition with regulation, they must clearly articulate their intent to do so,” explained Acting Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen. “Because Seattle’s action exceeded its authority from the state, the state action defense should be rejected” she said.
The FTC vote approving the amicus brief filing was 2-0. It was filed before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Nov. 3, 2017. (FTC File No P082105; the staff contact is Michelle Arington, Office of the General Counsel, 202-326-3157.)
The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.