Michelin North America Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance Publication: Federal Register Signing Official: Otto G. Matheke III Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Date: 12 July 2022 Topic: Michelin

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41380-41381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0040; Notice 1]


Michelin North America Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Michelin North America, Inc., (MNA), has determined that 
certain Michelin X Multi D+ replacement tires do not fully comply with 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic 
Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536 kilograms 
(10,000 pounds), Specialty Tires, and Tires for Motorcycles. MNA filed 
an original noncompliance report dated March 25, 2022. MNA subsequently 
petitioned NHTSA on April 19, 2022, for a decision that the subject 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. 
This document announces receipt of MNA's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before August 11, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were 
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the 
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change 
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, Office of Vehicle 
Safety Compliance, NHTSA, (325) 655-0547.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: MNA determined that certain Michelin X Multi D+ 
replacement tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(j) of FMVSS 
No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more 
than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds), Specialty Tires, and Tires for 
Motorcycles. (49 CFR 571.119).
    MNA filed an original noncompliance report dated March 25, 2022, 
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility 
and Reports. MNA subsequently petitioned NHTSA on April 19, 2022, for 
an

[[Page 41381]]

exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or 
Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of MNA's petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or 
another exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Tires Involved: Approximately 160 Michelin X Multi D+, 
size11R22.5, replacement tires, manufactured between May 26, 2019, and 
June 29, 2019, are potentially involved.
    III. Noncompliance: MNA explains that the noncompliance was due to 
a mold error in which the subject tires are missing the letter 
designating the tire load range as required by paragraph S6.5(j) of 
FMVSS No. 119. Specifically, the sidewalls of the subject tires omit 
the designated load range letter ``H.''
    IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S6.5(j) of FMVSS No. 119 includes 
the requirements relevant to this petition. The subject tires are 
required to be marked on each sidewall with the tire load range letter.
    V. Summary of MNA's Petition: The following views and arguments 
presented in this section, ``V. Summary of MNA's Petition,'' are the 
views and arguments provided by MNA. They have not been evaluated by 
the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. MNA describes 
the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
    MNA explains that the noncompliance was found when a Michelin Field 
Engineer was notified that some of the subject tires ``had a different 
tread pattern than the customer was accustomed to.'' MNA explains that 
the subject tires were intended for the Asia and India tire markets, 
yet were certified to the applicable U.S. FMVSS, and properly labeled 
with the certification symbol ``DOT.'' MNA states that the tires 
``entered the U.S. through channels outside of Michelin's control.'' 
MNA says that the subject tires have not been sold through MNA's sales 
or distribution channels. MNA also states that it has taken corrective 
measures to prevent the shipping or sale of the tires by blocking the 
SKUs in its internal databases.
    MNA claims that the subject tires were manufactured as a load index 
148 single/145 dual tire with a maximum single load rating of 3150 
kilograms or 6940 pounds at 830 kPa or 120 psi cold inflation pressure 
and a maximum dual load rating of 2900 kilograms or 6395 pounds at 830 
kPa or 120 psi cold inflation pressure. In regard to operational 
safety, MNA asserts that it tested the subject tires and found that 
they comply with the necessary performance requirements required by 
FMVSS No. 119. Except for the subject noncompliance, MNA also claims 
that the subject tires meet all marking requirements and ``are also 
marked with load indices for single and dual applications,'' which MNA 
contends will ``provide both dealers and consumers with the necessary 
information to enable proper selection and application of the tires.''
    MNA states that it has blocked the SKU for the subject tires in its 
systems to prevent shipment to the U.S. and sale through MNA. MNA also 
states that the molds will be updated to include the required load 
range letter designation and until then, the SKU will remain blocked in 
its systems.
    MNA says that NHTSA has previously granted petitions which it 
believes are similar to the subject petition. MNA refers to the 
granting of the petition submitted by China Manufacturers Alliance, 
LLC, for 1,753,089 truck & bus radial replacement tires that were 
missing the letter marking that designates the tire load range on the 
tire sidewall.
    MNA concludes by stating its belief that the subject noncompliance 
is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and its 
petition to be exempted from providing notification of the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject tires that MNA no longer 
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. 
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve tire 
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after MNA 
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-14767 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P