|
|---|
|
Michelin North America, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance Publication: Federal Register Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Byline: Otto G. Matheke III Date: 23 June 2022 Subjects: American Government  , Safety, Tires
Topic: Michelin |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37553-37555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13365]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0077; Notice 1]
Michelin North America, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Michelin North America, LLC (MNA), has determined that certain
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 replacement passenger car tires do
not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September 14, 2021, and subsequently
petitioned
[[Page 37554]]
NHTSA on September 30, 2021, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice announces receipt of MNA's petition.
DATES: Send comments on or before July 25, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer,
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655-0547.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
MNA has determined that certain Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply with the
requirements of paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139, New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles (49 CFR 571.139). MNA filed a
noncompliance report dated September 14, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part
573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. MNA
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on September 30, 2021, for an exemption
from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates
to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)
and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
This notice of receipt of MNA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved
According to MNA approximately 3,589 Michelin Pilot Sport All
Season 4, size 295/40ZR21 111Y XL, replacement passenger car tires,
manufactured between October 7, 2020, and August 20, 2021, and sold in
the United States and Canada were affected by the subject
noncompliance. MNA says that of the 3,589 tires, 1,729 tires entered
the U.S. market, 110 entered the Canadian market, and the remaining
1,750 were blocked in Michelin's inventory control system to be
repaired or scrapped. For the 110 tires that entered the Canadian
market, the agency cannot exempt MNA from the duties found in sections
30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and
dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or
noncompliance for those tires. Therefore, the agency's decision will
only apply to the 1,729 tires that entered U.S. market.
III. Noncompliance
MNA explains that the noncompliance was due to a mold error in
which one sidewall, the serial sidewall, of the subject tires
incorrectly state the maximum load range as required by paragraph
S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139. Specifically, the subject tires were marked
with a maximum load of 1090 kg (1433 lbs.) when they should have been
marked with a maximum load of 1090 kg (2403 lbs.).
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S5.5.4(b) of FMVSS No. 139 includes the requirements
relevant to this petition. For passenger car tires, if the maximum
inflation pressure of a tire is 240, 280, 300, 340, or 350 kPa, then
each marking of the tire's maximum load rating in kilograms must be
followed in parenthesis by the equivalent load rating in pounds,
rounded to the nearest whole number.
V. Summary of MNA's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V.
Summary of MNA's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided by
MNA. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the
views of the Agency. MNA describes the subject noncompliance and
contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
MNA asserts that although erroneously marked, the subject tires
were ``designed as a load index 111 tire, with a maximum load rating of
1090 kilograms, or 2403 pounds.'' MNA says that the subject tires
``fully comply with Michelin performance requirements'' and with all
applicable FMVSSs. According to MNA, other than the tire maximum load
rating in pounds, the tires are correctly marked and ``provide both
dealers and consumers with the necessary information to enable proper
selection and application of the tires.'' MNA says that if a consumer
were to go by the erroneous maximum load, in pounds, based on the
markings on the tire, the tire would be put ``into service respecting a
maximum load of 1433 lbs., which is less than the actual designed
maximum load of 2403 lbs.''
MNA cites the following past inconsequentiality petitions NHTSA has
granted that MNA claims are similar to the subject petition:
[[Page 37555]]
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 78 FR
35357, June 12, 2013;
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See FR 41254, July 18, 2005;
Continental Tire North America Inc., Grant of Application
for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 70 FR 14748, March
23, 2005;
Michelin North America, Inc., Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. See 69 FR 62511, October 26,
2004; and
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Grant of Application for
Decision That Noncompliance Is Inconsequential to Motor Vehicle Safety.
See 66 FR 57772, November 16, 2001.
MNA states that they have ``captured and retained'' a total of
1,750 tires with the intent to either repair or scrap them. MNA also
states that they have corrected the tire specification drawing and
updated the mold to reflect the correct maximum load in pounds.
MNA concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as
it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted
from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that MNA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after MNA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-13365 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P