|
|---|
|
Air Plan Approval; FL; Removal of Motor Vehicle Rules Publication: Federal Register Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Byline: John Blevins Date: 22 November 2021 Subjects: American Government  , The Environment
|
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 222 (Monday, November 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66255-66259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24943]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0362; FRL-9238-01-R4]
Air Plan Approval; FL; Removal of Motor Vehicle Rules
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), via a letter dated July 2, 2020. The revision
removes rules prohibiting tampering with motor vehicle air pollution
control equipment and rules concerning visible emissions from motor
vehicles. EPA is proposing to remove the tampering rules and visible
emissions rules from the SIP pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
and applicable regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2020-0362 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
[[Page 66256]]
The telephone number is (404) 562-9222. Ms. Sheckler can also be
reached via electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 1988, Florida adopted the ``Clean Outdoor Air Law'' (COAL) to
reduce motor vehicle emissions across the State, particularly in six
urban counties (Duval, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Palm Beach, Broward, and
Miami-Dade) which were designated nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The primary
purpose of the law was to create a vehicle inspection and maintenance
(I&M) program in the six nonattainment counties, which was embodied in
Florida Statutes (F.S.) Chapter 325. Additionally, Florida drafted
Section 316.2935 F.S. as the statewide component of the law to
generally address motor vehicle air pollution control equipment
tampering and motor vehicle visible emissions.
In February 1990, FDEP adopted Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Chapters 62-243 and 62-244 to implement certain on-road prohibitions of
Section 316.2935 F.S. The on-road rules gave guidance to law
enforcement officers in the State on how to exercise their authority to
issue noncriminal traffic citations to persons operating any motor
vehicle on public roads that has been tampered with or to anyone
operating a motor vehicle emitting visible emissions from the vehicle's
tailpipe on public roads.
In May 1990 and January 1991, the State modified Chapter 62-243
F.A.C. to implement the portions of Section 316.2935 F.S. that prohibit
licensed motor vehicle dealers from offering or displaying for sale,
lease, or transfer any vehicle that has been tampered with; require
such dealers to certify to each motor vehicle buyer or lessee that the
vehicle has been inspected and found to be free of any visual evidence
of tampering; and prohibit the operation of tampered motor vehicles on
public roads. Section 316.2935(1)(a) F.S. defines tampering to include
the removal or disabling of any motor vehicle air pollution control
devices or systems installed by the manufacturer except to replace them
with an equivalent device or system. Chapter 62-243--Tampering with
Motor Vehicles Air Pollution Control Equipment contained seven rules:
Rule 62-243.100--``Purpose and Scope;'' Rule 62-243.200--
``Definitions;'' Rule 62-243.300--``Exemptions;'' Rule 62-243.400--
``Prohibitions;'' Rule 62-243.500--``Certification;'' Rule 62-243.600--
``Enforcement;'' and 62-243.700--``Penalties.'' EPA approved the
amended rules into the Florida SIP in 1992. See 57 FR 24370 and 57 FR
24378 (June 9, 1992). In 2012, in response to a statewide effort to
eliminate obsolete and unnecessary rules, Florida repealed all of the
rules from Chapter 62-243 F.A.C. except for Rules 62-243.300 and
62.243.500. Florida repealed Rule 62-243.300 in 2017, but Rule 62-
243.500 remains in the state rules. Florida repealed the state rules
from Chapter 62-243 that repeated the substantive provisions of Section
316.2935 F.S.
The purpose of Chapter 62-244 was to prohibit the operation of any
gasoline or diesel-powered vehicle on public roads that emitted visible
emissions for more than five continuous seconds. The rules provided
exceptions for diesel powered vehicles when the vehicle was
accelerating, lugging, or decelerating. Additionally, these rules were
intended to support the State's I&M program.\1\ Chapter 62-244--Visible
Emissions from Motor Vehicles contained six rules: Rule 62-244.100--
``Purpose and Scope;'' Rule 62-244.200--``Definitions;'' Rule 62-
244.300--``Exemptions;'' Rule 62-244.400--``Prohibitions;'' Rule 62-
244.500--``Enforcement;'' and Rule 62-244.600--``Penalties.'' EPA
approved these rules with a state-effective date of February 21, 1990
into the Florida SIP in 1992. See 57 FR 24370. In 1995, in response to
a statewide effort to eliminate obsolete and unnecessary rules, Florida
repealed Chapter 62-244 F.A.C from the state rules because they
repeated the substantive provisions of Section 316.2935 F.S.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Florida terminated the I&M program on July 1, 2000 and
repealed Chapter 325 F.S. in 2001. Subsequently, Florida submitted
SIP revisions to remove the emissions reductions credits
attributable to the program from the maintenance plan for the Tampa
Area on August 29, 2000. EPA approved this SIP revision in 2002. See
67 FR 53314 (August 15, 2002). However, in this submission, Florida
did not explicitly request removal of the I&M program from the SIP.
On November 29, 2012, Florida submitted a SIP revision requesting
that EPA remove the I&M rules at Chapter 62-242 from the Florida
SIP, and EPA approved the removal in 2014. See 79 FR 573 (February
5, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. What is EPA's analysis of Florida's submittal?
A. Chapter 62-243 F.A.C.--Tampering With Motor Vehicle Air Pollution
Control Equipment
In Florida's July 2, 2020, SIP revision, the State requests the
removal of Chapter 62-243 from the Florida SIP in its entirety. As
discussed above, Florida has repealed the majority of Chapter 62-243
F.A.C. in response to a statewide effort to remove obsolete and
unnecessary rules. The anti-tampering measures in Chapter 62-243
prohibit the offering or displaying for sale, lease, or transfer of
nonexempt motor vehicles by licensed motor vehicle dealers; require
such dealers to certify to each motor vehicle buyer or lessee that the
vehicle has been inspected and found to be free of any visual evidence
of tampering; and prohibit the operation of tampered, nonexempt motor
vehicles on public roads.
The CAA prohibits tampering with emission controls equipment
installed on or in motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines at section
203(a)(3), but it does not require states to adopt anti-tampering
measures or include anti-tampering measures in their SIPs. See 42
U.S.C. 7522(a)(3).2 3 Additionally, CAA section 203
prohibits the sale or lease of any new vehicle that has been tampered
with. See 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(4).\4\ Florida voluntarily implemented
anti-tampering laws to prevent tampered vehicles from being dumped into
counties without an I&M program, and did not use Chapter 62-243 as a
control strategy to ensure attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS or to
comply with any CAA provision.\5\ Given the air quality analysis in
Section II.C, below, the scope of CAA's tampering provisions, the
significant penalties associated with violating those provisions, and
the fact that Florida did not rely on these anti-tampering rules to
meet ambient air
[[Page 66257]]
quality standards, EPA believes that removal of Chapter 62-243 is
consistent with CAA section 110(l) (i.e., that removal will not
interfere with any applicable requirements concerning attainment,
reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other
applicable requirements of the CAA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3)(A) states that the following is
prohibited: ``for any person to remove or render inoperative any
device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or
motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under this
subchapter prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser,
or for any person knowingly to remove or render inoperative any such
device or element of design after such sale and delivery to the
ultimate purchaser. . .''
\3\ EPA's Tampering Policy (``Tampering Memo'') dated November
23, 2020, provides guidance on what constitutes a violation of CAA
section 203(a)(3). The Tampering Memo can be found at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/documents/epatamperingpolicy-enforcementpolicyonvehicleandenginetampering.pdf.
\4\ 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3)(B) states that the following is
prohibited: ``for any person to manufacture or sell, or offer to
sell, or install, any part or component intended for use with, or as
part of, any motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine, where a
principal effect of the part or component is to bypass, defeat, or
render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or
in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with
regulations under this subchapter, and where the person knows or
should know that such part or component is being offered for sale or
installed for such use or put to such use. . .''
\5\ See 57 FR 24378; July 2, 2020, SIP revision at pp. 6-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Chapter 62-244 F.A.C.--Visible Emission From Motor Vehicles
In Florida's July 2, 2020, SIP revision, the State requests the
removal of Chapter 62-244 from the Florida SIP in its entirety. Chapter
62-244 implements requirements relating to the operation of a motor
vehicle on public roads in the State that emit visible emissions from
the exhaust tailpipe for more than a continuous period of five seconds.
Florida removed Chapter 62-244 in its entirety in 1995 in response to a
statewide effort to remove obsolete and unnecessary rules.
The CAA does not require states to adopt measures addressing
visible emissions from motor vehicles or include such measures in their
SIPs, and Florida did not use Chapter 62-244 as a control strategy to
meet any of the NAAQS.\6\ Since Florida's adoption of the visible
emissions rules and EPA's incorporation of those rules into the SIP
approximately thirty years ago, there have been significant advances in
motor vehicle technology, including on-board diagnostics (OBD) which
are required in all light-duty vehicles with a 1994 onwards model year,
and significant fleet turnover (i.e., old vehicles being replaced with
new vehicles that meet more stringent engine standards).\7\ Given the
current state of motor vehicle technology and fleet turnover, EPA
expects that the number of smoking vehicles has reduced significantly
since the inclusion of Chapter 62-244 in the SIP and that, given the
air quality analysis below and the fact that Florida did not rely on
these visible emissions rules to meet ambient air quality standards,
removal of the visible emissions rule is consistent with CAA section
110(l). Furthermore, EPA expects that some percentage of smoking
vehicles in Florida are caused by vehicle tampering, which remains
illegal under the CAA as mentioned in the previous subsection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See July 2, 2020 SIP Revision at pp. 6-7.
\7\ OBD is computer software that monitors the emission control
and emission-related components/systems, along with certain engine
components that provide vehicle operational information. For
additional information regarding OBD, see, e.g., On-Board Diagnostic
(OBD) Regulations and Requirements: Questions and Answers, EPA 420-
F-03-042 (December 2003), available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100LW9G.PDF?Dockey=P100LW9G.PDF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Evaluation of Relevant NAAQS Status for Motor Vehicle Emissions \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ All design values in this notice of proposed rulemaking are
available on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values#report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are six NAAQS established to protect human health and the
environment. These NAAQS are carbon monoxide (CO), lead, nitrogen
dioxide (NO2), ozone, particulate matter (PM)--including
PM2.5 \9\ and PM10,\10\ and sulfur dioxide
(SO2). Considering modern fuel types and the science and
technology related to emissions from motor vehicles, EPA does not
believe that there would be any changes in emissions of lead \11\ or
PM10 \12\ from removing vehicle tampering or visible
emissions rules from the Florida SIP. Furthermore, EPA does not believe
that SO2 air quality would be threatened given the mandatory
use of ultra-low sulfur (ULSD) diesel fuel.\13\ Therefore, this section
is focused on evaluating air quality for CO, NO2, ozone, and
PM2.5. Florida is in attainment for all NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ PM2.5 refers to particles with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, oftentimes
referred to as ``fine'' particles.
\10\ PM10 refers to particles with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to 10 micrometers, which includes
PM2.5.
\11\ On November 12, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised lead NAAQS
of 0.15 microgram per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\). See 73 FR 66964.
On November 22, 2010, EPA designated a portion of Hillsborough
County nonattainment for the 2008 lead NAAQS and designated the
remainder of the State unclassifiable/attainment. See 75 FR 71033.
Effective October 11, 2018, EPA redesignated the Hillsborough County
area to attainment. See 83 FR 45836 (September 11, 2018). As of
January 1, 1996, the sale of leaded fuel for use in on-road motor
vehicles was banned. Therefore, removing the tampering and visible
emissions rules from the Florida SIP will not have any impact on
ambient concentrations of lead.
\12\ On March 15, 1991, EPA completed initial designations for
the PM10 NAAQS. See 56 FR 11101. The entire state of
Florida has been designated attainment for every PM10
standard. On-road motor vehicles do not emit PM10,
therefore, removing the tampering and visible emissions rules from
the Florida SIP will not have any impact on ambient concentrations
of PM10.
\13\ On June 22, 2010, EPA revised the 1-hour SO2
NAAQS to 75 parts per billion (ppb) which became effective on August
23, 2010. See 75 FR 35520. On February 25, 2019, based on a review
of the full body of currently available scientific evidence and
exposure/risk information, EPA retained the existing 2010 1-hour
SO2 primary NAAQS. See 84 FR 9866. EPA designated both
the Nassau County and Hillsborough County Florida areas as
nonattainment effective October 4, 2013. See 78 FR 47191 (August 5,
2013). Effective May 19, 2019, EPA redesignated the Nassau County
area to attainment. See 84 FR 17085 (April 24, 2019). Effective
December 12, 2019, EPA redesignated the Hillsborough County area to
attainment. See 84 FR 60927 (November 12, 2019). EPA designated the
Hillsborough-Polk County area as nonattainment effective April 9,
2018. See 83 FR 1098 (January 9, 2018). Effective March 23, 2020,
EPA redesignated the Hillsborough-Polk area to attainment. See 85 FR
9666 (February 20, 2020). The entire State is currently in
attainment for the SO2 NAAQS. In 2006, EPA finalized
regulations that began to phase in a requirement to use ULSD, a
diesel fuel with a maximum of 15 ppm sulfur. Since 2010, EPA's
diesel standards have required that all highway diesel fuel vehicles
use ULSD, and all highway diesel fuel supplied to the market is
ULSD. Due to the requirements to use ULSD under the on-road diesel
fuel standards, the amount of SO2 emitted from on-road
vehicles is already low. Furthermore, the visible emissions rules in
Florida's SIP are not designed to reduce emissions of
SO2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Ozone NAAQS
On February 8, 1979 (44 FR 8202), EPA promulgated the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS of 0.12 parts per million (ppm).\14\ On July 18, 1997 (62 FR
38856), EPA promulgated an 8-hour ozone standard of 0.08 ppm.\15\
Subsequently, on March 12, 2008, EPA revised both the primary and
secondary 8-hour ozone NAAQS to a level of 0.075 ppm to provide
increased protection of public health and the environment. See 73 FR
16436 (March 27, 2008). The 2008 ozone NAAQS retain the same general
form and averaging time as the 0.08 ppm NAAQS set in 1997 but are set
at a more protective level. Under EPA's regulations at 40 CFR part 50,
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are attained when the 3-year average of the
annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality
ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. See 40 CFR
50.15. On October 26, 2015 (80 FR 65292), EPA published a final rule
lowering the level of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS to 0.070 ppm and retaining
the same form and averaging time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS was revoked, effective June 15,
2005. See 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004).
\15\ The 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS was revoked, effective April 6,
2015. See 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA designated all but three areas in Florida as attainment for the
1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA designated Jacksonville (Duval County) as
a CAA section 185A (or ``transitional'') area; Tampa-St. Petersburg-
Clearwater (Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) as a marginal
nonattainment area; and Miami (Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Counties)
as a moderate nonattainment area for the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
Subsequently, Florida submitted redesignation requests and maintenance
plans for these areas which EPA approved in 1995. See 60 FR 41 (January
3, 1995), 60 FR 62748 (December 7, 1995), and 60 FR 10325 (February 24,
1995), respectively. The entire State was designated as unclassifiable/
attainment and attainment/unclassifiable for the 2008 and 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS,
[[Page 66258]]
respectively. See 77 FR 30088 (May 12, 2012) and 82 FR 54232 (November
16, 2017).
Currently, Florida is designated as attainment for all ozone NAAQS,
and the latest complete monitoring design values (2018-2020) show that
all areas in Florida are below the NAAQS with values ranging from 0.057
ppm to 0.067 ppm.
2. PM2.5 NAAQS
On July 18, 1997, EPA established an annual PM2.5 NAAQS
of 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\, based on a 3-year average of annual mean
PM2.5 concentrations, and a 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
of 65 [mu]g/m\3\, based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of
24-hour concentrations.\16\ See 62 FR 38652. On September 21, 2006, EPA
retained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\ but
revised the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS to 35 [mu]g/m\3\, based
again on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations. See 71 FR 61144 (October 17, 2006). On December 14,
2012, EPA retained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35 [mu]g/
m\3\ but revised the annual primary PM2.5 NAAQS to 12.0
[mu]g/m\3\, based again on a 3-year average of annual mean
PM2.5 concentrations. See 78 FR 3086 (January 15, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS was revoked for
areas designated as attainment, effective October 24, 2016. See 81
FR 58010 (August 24, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA published designations for the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS on January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944) and April 14, 2005 (70 FR 19844),
designating all counties in the Florida as attainment for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), and
on January 15, 2015 (80 FR 2206), EPA published notices designating all
counties in Florida as unclassifiable/attainment for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS and the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS,
respectively. The latest complete monitoring design values (2019-2020)
show that all areas in Florida are below the 2012 PM2.5
annual standard, with values ranging from 6.2 [mu]g/m\3\ to 9.1 [mu]g/
m\3\. Regarding the 24-hour PM2.5 standard, the most recent
monitoring design values (2018-2020) for the 24-hour standard range
from 14 [mu]g/m\3\ to 20 [mu]g/m\3\, below the NAAQS.
3. NO2 NAAQS
In 1971, EPA set an annual standard for NO2 at a level
of 53 parts per billion (ppb) which has since remained unchanged. See
36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971). On February 9, 2010, EPA established a 1-
hour NO2 standard set at 100 ppb. See 75 FR 6474. The annual
standard from 1971 was retained at 53 ppb based on the annual mean
concentration. Id.
EPA designated all counties in Florida as unclassifiable/attainment
for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS. See 77 FR 9532 (February 17,
2012). Further, EPA has never designated any area in Florida as
nonattainment for either NO2 NAAQS. The latest complete
monitoring design value (2020) shows that all areas in Florida are
below the annual standard with values ranging from 3 to 13 ppb.
Regarding the 1-hour NO2 standard, the latest complete
monitoring design value (2018-2020) shows that all areas in Florida are
below the 1-hour NO2 standard with values \17\ ranging from
29 to 43 ppb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The 1-hour design value is evaluated over a three-year
period. Specifically, the design value is based on the three-year
average of the 98th percentile of the yearly distribution of 1-hour
daily maximum concentrations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. CO NAAQS
EPA promulgated the CO NAAQS in 1971 and has retained the primary
standards since that time. The primary NAAQS for CO consist of: (1) An
8-hour standard of 9 ppm, not to be exceeded more than once in a year
(i.e., the second highest, non-overlapping 8-hour average concentration
cannot exceed the standard); and (2) a 1-hour average of 35 ppm, not to
be exceeded more than once in a year.
The entire State has always been designated as unclassifiable/
attainment for the CO NAAQS. The latest complete monitoring design
values (2019-2020) show that all areas in Florida are below the 8-hour
CO standard with values \18\ ranging from 0.5 to 1.7 ppm. Regarding the
1-hour CO NAAQS, the latest complete monitoring design value (2019-
2020) shows that all areas in Florida are below the 1-hour CO standard
with values ranging from 0.8 to 2.3 ppm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The design value is evaluated over a two-year period.
Specifically, the design value is the higher of each year's annual
second maximum, non-overlapping 8-hour average. The design value
listed for each area is the highest among monitors with valid design
values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Summary of Proposed Conclusions
EPA proposes to find that removal of the vehicle tampering rules
from the Florida SIP would satisfy CAA section 110(l) because, as
discussed above, the CAA contains strong anti-tampering provisions,
there are significant penalties for violating those provisions, Florida
did not rely on its tampering rules to meet ambient air quality
standards, and Florida's design values are below the level of the
relevant NAAQS. EPA also proposes to find that the removal of the
visible emissions rule would satisfy section 110(l) because, as
discussed above, there have been significant improvements in vehicle
engine and emissions technology since the rules were adopted by the
State and incorporated into the SIP approximately thirty years ago;
there has been, and continues to be, fleet turnover; the CAA's anti-
tampering provisions prohibit tampering that could, in some cases,
result in visible emissions; and Florida's design values are below the
level of the relevant NAAQS. For these reasons, EPA proposes to find
that removal of the tampering and visible emissions requirements for
the Florida SIP would not interfere with any applicable CAA
requirements.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to amend regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. EPA is proposing to remove Chapter
62-243, F.A.C.--Tampering with Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control
Equipment and Chapter 62-244, F.A.C.--Visible Emissions from Motor
Vehicles which are incorporated by reference in accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR part 51. EPA has made, and will continue to make,
the State Implementation Plan generally available at the EPA Region 4
Office (please contact the person identified in the '' section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to remove Chapter 62-243, F.A.C.--Tampering with
Motor Vehicle Emission Control Equipment and Chapter 62-244, F.A.C.--
Visible Emissions from Motor Vehicles from the Florida SIP. EPA is
proposing to approve the removal of these rules from the SIP because
removing them is consistent with the CAA and applicable regulations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions
[[Page 66259]]
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rulemaking does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2021-24943 Filed 11-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P