|
|---|
|
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of New York; Clean Fuel Fleet Opt Out Publication: Federal Register Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Byline: William J. Muszynski P.E. Date: 6 January 1995 Subject: American Government  • The Environment
|
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2022-2025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-288]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Region II Docket No. 138, NY20-1-6729a, FRL-5124-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of New
York; Clean Fuel Fleet Opt Out
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this action, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
announcing partial approval and partial disapproval of the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the State of New York for the purpose
of meeting the requirement to submit the Clean Fuel Fleet program
(CFFP) or a substitute program that meets the requirements of the Clean
Air Act. EPA is approving the State's plans for implementing a
substitute program to opt out of the light duty vehicle portion of the
CFFP and disapproving the State's commitment to adopt a CFFP for heavy
duty vehicles at a future date.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 7, 1995 unless adverse or
critical comments are received by February 6, 1995. If the effective
date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to:
William S. Baker, Chief, Air Programs Branch, Air and Waste Management
Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Office, 26 Federal
Plaza, New York, New York 10278.
Copies of the state submittals are available at the following
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket 6102, 401 M Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Office, Air Programs Branch,
26 Federal Plaza, Room 1034A, New York, New York 10278.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of
Air Resources, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. Moltzen, Environmental
Engineer, Technical Evaluation Section, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1034A, New
York, New York 10278, (212) 264-2517.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(c)(4)(A) of the Clean Air Act requires certain States,
including [[Page 2023]] New York, to submit for EPA approval a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that includes measures to implement
the Clean Fuel Fleet program (CFFP). Under this program, a certain
specified percentage of vehicles purchased by fleet operators for
covered fleets must meet emission standards that are more stringent
than those that apply to conventional vehicles. Covered fleets are
defined as fleets of 10 or more vehicles that are centrally fueled or
capable of being centrally fueled. The program applies in the New York
portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment
area beginning in 1999. Section 182(c)(4)(B) of the Act allows states
to ``opt out'' of the CFFP by submitting for EPA approval a SIP
revision consisting of a program or programs that will result in at
least equivalent long term reductions in ozone-producing and toxic air
emissions as achieved by the CFFP. The Clean Air Act directs EPA to
approve a substitute program if it achieves long-term reductions in
emissions of ozone-producing and toxic air pollutants equivalent to
those that would have been achieved by the CFFP or the portion of the
CFFP for which the measure is to be substituted.
The State of New York submitted on November 13, 1992 a SIP revision
which committed it to submit a substitute program or programs in lieu
of the CFFP, or the CFFP itself, by May 15, 1994. Prior to EPA action
on New York's commitment, the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia ruled that EPA's conditional approval policy in general was
contrary to law. [NRDC v. EPA, 22 F.3d. 1125 (D.C. Cir. 1994)]. The
court held that a bare commitment from a state was not sufficient to
warrant conditional approval from EPA under section 110(k)(4) of the
Act. Therefore, following this decision, EPA could not approve New
York's commitment of November 1992.
However, in fashioning a remedy for EPA's improper use of it's
conditional approval authority, the NRDC Appellate court did not want
to penalize the states for their reliance on EPA's actions. EPA also
does not believe that New York should lose its opportunity to opt out
of the CFFP with a substitute program that meets the requirements of
section 182(c)(4)(B) because of EPA's failure to act on New York's
commitment, especially since New York has, in reliance on EPA advice,
submitted such a substitute program for EPA approval prior to any EPA
action on the commitment.
Therefore, EPA will consider all submissions made thus far by the
State that are intended to substitute for the CFFP, including that of
May 15, 1994 which transmitted the New York State Code of Rules and
Regulations Part 218, the State's low emission vehicle program and the
submission of August 9, 1994, supplementing the May 1994 submittal, in
conjunction with the November 1992 commitment.
The Act requires states to observe certain procedural requirements
in developing implementation plan revisions for submission to EPA.
Sections 110(a)(2) and 172(c)(7) of the Act require states to provide
reasonable notice and opportunity for public comment before accepting
the submitted measures. Section 110(1) of the Act also requires states
to provide reasonable notice and hold a public hearing before adopting
SIP provisions.
EPA must also determine whether a state's submittal is complete
before taking further action on the submittal. See section 110(k)(1).
EPA's completeness criteria for SIP submittals are set out in 40 CFR
Part 51, Appendix V (1993).
II. State Submittal
New York submitted a SIP revision on May 15, 1994 (and supplemented
it on August 9, 1994) which substituted a low emission vehicle (LEV)
program for the light duty vehicle portion of the CFFP. The State
adopted the LEV program, New York's Part 218, ``Emission Standards for
Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Engines,'' on April 28, 1992. New York
held public hearings on February 8 and 9, 1993 and on January 11, 1994
to entertain public comment on its 1992 and 1993 SIP revisions,
respectively; these hearings included the State's proposal to opt out
of the CFFP with LEV as a substitute program. EPA reviewed the State's
submission for completeness, in accordance with the completeness
criteria, and on September 1, 1994 found the submittals to be complete.
EPA notified New York in writing of this finding.
New York's submittal divides the CFFP into two separate
requirements; that portion which applies to light duty fleet vehicles,
and a second requirement for heavy duty fleet vehicles. This
interpretation is provided for in sections 182 and 246 of the Clean Air
Act (see part III. of this notice, ``Analysis of State Submission'').
The State exercised its choice to substitute enough emission reduction
credit from its LEV program for the light duty portion of the CFFP. New
York has not submitted a substitute for the heavy duty portion of the
CFFP. Nor has the State adopted the heavy duty fleet program.
III. Analysis of State Submission
Section 182(c)(4) of the Clean Air Act, which allows states
required to implement a CFFP to ``opt out'' of the program by
submitting a SIP revision consisting of a substitute program, requires
that the substitute program result in emission reductions equal to or
greater than does the CFFP. Also, EPA can only approve such substitute
programs that consist exclusively of provisions other than those
required under the Clean Air Act for the area. New York's LEV program
satisfies both of these requirements as they pertain to the light duty
portion of the fleet program.
Section 182(c)(4)(B) states that a measure can be substituted for
all or a portion of the CFFP, and such a substitute program will be
approvable if it achieves long-term emission reductions equivalent to
those that would have been achieved by the portion of the CFFP for
which the measure is to be substituted. Section 246 implies that the
CFFP can be subdivided into a light duty vehicle portion (up to 8,500
pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)) and a heavy duty vehicle
portion (from 8,501 pounds GVWR to 26,000 pounds GVWR). This is made
apparent most notably by section 246(f)(2)(B), which restricts the use
of Clean Fuel Fleet credits generated for either light or heavy duty
fleet vehicles to those classes, respectively. Credit trading between
weight classes is prohibited.
In recognizing the severable nature of the CFFP, New York has
chosen to submit a substitute measure, the State's LEV program, that is
intended to substitute for only the light duty portion of the CFFP. The
State must therefore implement a heavy duty CFFP which also complies
with section 246 of the Clean Air Act. New York is currently required
by state law to adopt and implement a heavy duty fleet program and
consequently has not chosen to opt-out of the heavy duty portion of the
CFFP. However, the State has not yet adopted a heavy duty fleet program
(New York's Clean Air Compliance Act called for adoption of the heavy
duty fleet program by May 15, 1994).
New York, in exercising its option under section 177 of the Clean
Air Act, has adopted a LEV program which affects all new light duty
vehicles, specifically passenger cars and light duty trucks under 6,000
lbs. GVWR for vehicle model years 1994 and later. The LEV program is a
far reaching, technology-forcing program designed to improve the
emissions performance of vehicles over a long period of time. The
[[Page 2024]] LEV program sets forth five different sets of emission
standards, and vehicle manufacturers may market any combination of
vehicles provided that the annual average emissions of each
manufacturer's fleet complies with a fleet average limit that becomes
more stringent each year. In addition, New York's LEV program requires
manufacturers to begin to market a fixed percentage of zero emission
vehicles (ZEVs) in model year 1998. The ZEV requirement will help
assure that the LEV program will achieve a significant amount of ozone
forming emission reductions, beyond those achieved by the light duty
portion of the CFFP.
New York's LEV program will assure reductions of ozone-forming and
air toxics emissions that are at least equivalent to those that would
be realized through the light duty portion of a CFFP. Moreover, a light
duty CFFP would affect a much smaller subset of vehicles than the LEV
program, since the fleet vehicles affected by the CFFP would be limited
to a set yearly percentage of new vehicles purchased by fleet operators
of covered fleets, restricted to the New York State portion of the New
York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment area. The LEV
program is a statewide program affecting the sale of all light duty
vehicles. The LEV program has fleet average emission standards that are
comparable to those established by the Clean Air Act for clean fuel
fleet vehicles in the CFFP. With respect to long term emission
standards for non-methane organic gases (NMOG), the CFFP requires that
70% of new light duty fleet vehicles purchased annually in covered
fleets have a standard of 0.075 grams per mile (model year 2000 and
later), while the LEV program requires that the long term NMOG standard
for 100% of all light duty vehicles be no more than 0.062 grams per
mile (model year 2003 and later).
While New York's LEV program does not cover vehicles in the weight
class range of 6,000 to 8,500 pounds GVWR, in its SIP revision New York
states that it will dedicate enough ozone forming and toxic emission
reduction credit as is necessary to fully substitute for the entire
light duty portion of the CFFP. Also, while the light duty portion of
the CFFP covers the 6,000 to 8,500 pound vehicle range, the State still
plans to adopt and implement a heavy duty fleet program, as required by
its Clean Air Compliance Act, which will include this vehicle weight
range.
The Clean Air Act also requires New York to adopt a CFFP that
applies to heavy duty vehicles. The long term emission standard for
heavy duty vehicles participating in the CFFP, independent of fuel
type, is a combined non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) plus nitrogen oxide
(NOx) standard of 3.8 grams per brake horsepower hour. This is about a
50 percent reduction from 1994 heavy duty diesel engine requirements
and would apply to 50 percent of affected heavy duty fleet vehicles for
model year 2000 and later. New York has not yet adopted a heavy duty
CFFP, nor has it submitted an adequate substitute measure for the heavy
duty portion of the CFFP. Although the State has legislative authority
to adopt and implement the heavy duty fleet program, EPA may not
approve a revision that lacks adopted measures.
As a result of these deficiencies, EPA finds, pursuant to 40 CFR
section 52.31(c)(2), that New York has failed to meet one or more of
the elements of submission required by the Act.
This notice initiates the sanction process, mandated by section
179(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act, as a result of the partial disapproval
of the New York SIP described in this notice. Section 179(b) of the
Clean Air Act prescribes certain mandatory sanctions that the
Administrator must impose upon a finding that a SIP revision submitted
by a state is not approvable. The two sanctions identified in the Clean
Air Act are: a requirement for a two-for-one emissions offsets in
nonattainment areas for construction of major new and modified sources,
and a cutoff of federal funding for certain highway projects. The
Administrator must impose the first sanction no later than eighteen
months of the date of the finding if the deficiency has not been
corrected and the second sanction no later than six months thereafter.
The offset sanction would apply at eighteen months and the highway
funding sanction at twenty-four months, although the Administrator can
change the sequence of the sanctions and accelerate their effective
date.
EPA, auto manufacturers, and states are currently considering the
possibility of developing a voluntary national LEV-equivalent motor
vehicle emission control program. See 59 FR 48664 (9/22/94) and 59 FR
53396 (10/24/94). EPA does not expect that this approval will impede
the development or implementation of such a program. If New York were
to participate in a LEV-equivalent program, it would have the
opportunity to revise its clean fuel fleet substitute program.
IV. Summary of Action
In this rule, EPA is taking final action to partially approve and
partially disapprove New York's SIP revision submitted to fulfill the
Clean Fuel Fleet requirements of the Clean Air Act. The State's adopted
Part 218 implementing the low emission vehicle program is an adequate
substitute for the light duty vehicle portion of the CFFP under section
182(c)(4).
The State has failed to fulfill the requirement to submit the
remaining portion of the CFFP, the heavy duty vehicle portion. EPA is
disapproving this portion of the State's submittal because it does not
consist of a State-adopted regulation.
Nothing in this rule should be construed as permitting or allowing
or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any
SIP. Each request for revision to any SIP shall be considered
separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental
factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory
requirements.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal Register
publication, the EPA is proposing a notice and comment period to allow
for adverse or critical comments to be considered. Thus, this direct
final action will be effective March 7, 1995 unless, by February 6,
1995, adverse or critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this rule will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this rule should
do so at this time. If no adverse comments are received, the public is
advised that this rule will be effective March 7, 1995. (See 47 FR
27073 and 59 FR 24059).
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et. seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but
[[Page 2025]] simply approve requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the federal SIP-approval does not impose
any new requirements, I certify that it does not have a significant
impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of
the federal-state relationship under the Clean Air Act, preparation of
a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute federal inquiry into
the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids
EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric
Co. v US EPA, 427 US 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
review under Executive Order 12866.
This rule may be withdrawn by EPA pursuant to procedures described
in this Federal Register notice. Before filing a petition for review,
potential petitioners under section 307(b)(1) of the Act are cautioned
to determine whether EPA has withdrawn the rule.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this rule must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit within 60 days from date of publication. Filing
a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This rule may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 21, 1994.
William J. Muszynski,
Acting Regional Administrator.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart HH--New York
2. Section 52.1670 is amended by adding new paragraph (c)(88) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.1670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(88) Revision to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
ozone, submitting a low emission vehicle program for a portion of the
Clean Fuel Fleet program, dated May 15, 1994 and August 9, 1994
submitted by the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC).
(i) Incorporation by reference. Part 218, ``Emission Standards for
Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Engines,'' effective May 28, 1992.
(ii) Additional material.
May 1994 NYSDEC Clean Fuel Fleet Program description.
3. Section 52.1679 is amended by adding, in numerical order, a new
entry Part 218 to the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1679 EPA-approved New York State regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York State regulation State effective date Latest EPA approval date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
Part 218 ``Emission Standards for 5/28/92............. January 6, 1995 [60 FR 2025]..... ....................
Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle
Engines''.
* * * * * *
*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 95-288 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P