|
|---|
|
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Ohio; Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Publication: Federal Register Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Byline: Valdas V. Adamkus Date: 4 April 1995 Subject: American Government • The Environment
|
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 17034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8222]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[OH69-1-6680b; FRL-5175-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Ohio; Enhanced
Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USEPA is taking action to approve, through a direct final
procedure, the State implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by
the State of Ohio for the purpose of controlling the motor vehicle
emissions of hydrocarbons. Emissions will be controlled by implementing
an enhanced inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in areas
classified as moderate nonattainment. The State currently operates I/M
programs in the Cleveland and Cincinnati areas to achieve reductions in
emissions of carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds. The
program proposed here calls for enhanced I/M in the metropolitan areas
of Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Cincinnati, and Dayton-Springfield which are
moderate nonattainment areas for ozone. Moderate nonattainment areas
are required to implement a basic I/M program. These areas have opted
up to enhanced I/M because of the greater cost-effective emission
reduction available compared to basic programs. The USEPA is approving
the State's I/M SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the USEPA views this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no critical or adverse comments.
In the final rules section of this Federal Register, USEPA is
approving the State's SIP revision request as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because USEPA views the approval of the
inspection and maintenance program as noncontroversial and anticipates
no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth
in the direct final rule. If no adverse or critical comments are
received in response to the direct final rule, no further activity is
contemplated in regards to this proposed rule. If USEPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. The USEPA will institute a second comment
period on this action only if warranted by revisions to the rulemaking
based on comments received. Any parties interested in commenting on
this notice should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 4, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: William L. MacDowell,
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement Branch (AE-17J),
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604
Copies of the State submittal and USEPA's analysis of it are
available for inspection at: Regulation Development Section, Air
Enforcement Branch (AE-17J), United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Paskevicz, at the above address
or call (312) 886-6084.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q).
Dated: March 10, 1995.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-8222 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P