DeTomaso Modena S.p.A.; Receipt of Application for Temporary Exemption From Three Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards |
---|
Topics: DeTomaso Guara
|
L. Robert Shelton
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
February 6, 1998
[Federal Register: February 6, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 25)] [Notices] [Page 6255-6256] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr06fe98-155] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-98-3412; Notice 1] DeTomaso Modena S.p.A.; Receipt of Application for Temporary Exemption From Three Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards DeTomaso Modena S.p.A. of Modena, Italy (``DeTomaso'') has applied for a temporary exemption from portions of three Federal motor vehicle safety standards as described below. The basis of the application is that compliance would cause substantial economic hardship to a manufacturer that has tried in good faith to comply with each of the standards. This notice of receipt of an application is published in accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 30113(b)(2) and does not represent any judgment of the agency on the merits of the application. DeTomaso is a small, independent Italian passenger car manufacturer which produced 15 vehicles between September 1, 1996, and September 1, 1997. The current car produced, and the one for which exemption is sought, is the Guara GT coupe. DeTomaso's ``sister'' corporation, DeTomaso Ponente Srl, was recently formed to launch the development and production of the Bigua coupe, intended as the successor to the Guara. The Bigua has been designed to conform to all applicable U.S. Federal motor vehicle safety standards. However, DeTomaso anticipates that it cannot begin production of the Bigua until 1999 ``given the significant investments required and the need for completion of outside financing.'' In the interim, it [[Page 6256]] needs to sell 50 Guaras in the next 12 months to have adequate cash- flow to prevent shut-down of its factory. Its cumulative net losses in the five-year period 1992-96 are slightly less than $7,625,000. Critical revenue can be generated by selling some Guaras in the American market. This will also afford an opportunity for DeTomaso to reintroduce its name in the United States after an absence of 20 years (its Pantera model was sold through Lincoln-Mercury dealers in the 1970s). The Guara has received full type approval under EC law. However, at the time it was designed, 1993, DeTomaso did not intend to sell it in the American market and such a decision was not reached until the Summer of 1997 when it became apparent that reentry into the United States with the Guara was financially necessary in advance of introduction of the fully-complying Bigua. DeTomaso cites NHTSA's grant of a temporary exemption to Bugatti as an example of relief being provided a vehicle which also was not designed with the U.S. market in mind (59 FR 11649). Its review of the Federal motor vehicle safety standards has led it to conclude that the Guara can meet all but a portion of three of them: Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection (the automatic restraint requirements of paragraph S4.1.5), Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection (the dynamic side impact requirements of paragraph S3(b)), and Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity (the lateral moving barrier and roll-over portions of paragraphs S6.3 and S6.4). Accordingly, it requests a two-year exemption from them. A denial would force DeTomaso to cease production of the Guara because of insufficient demand outside the United States for it, and remain closed until the Bigua was ready for manufacture. However, ``a denial of the exemption request will create the grave risk that potential investors will refrain from consummating their investments and could thus jeopardize the entire existence of DeTomaso.'' The company believes that it has made a good faith effort for the Bigua to meet the Federal motor vehicle safety standards for which it is requesting exemption on behalf of the Guara. The applicant believes that a temporary exemption would be in the public interest and consistent with traffic safety objectives for several reasons. The first is the low volume of exempted vehicles; it does not anticipate selling more than 50 Guaras in the United States over the next two years. The second is that the Guara will meet the requirements of S4.1 of Standard No. 208 with belted (3-point system) crash test dummies. This test will be piggy-backed with Standard No. 301's frontal impact test; the applicant informs NHTSA that it ``will modify its European design and fit reinforced structures on all exempted cars.'' It believes that ``this design should also provide significant benefit as regards side impact protection.'' DeTomaso argues that the mounting of the fuel tank in the central tubular chassis will reduce the risk of fuel system damage in the event of a crash. Finally, it will place a label on the dash advising occupants of the exemption and the need to wear their seat belts. Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the application described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and the notice number, and be submitted to: Central Docket Management Facility, room Pl-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted. All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated below will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket (from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.) at the above address both before and after that date. Comments may also be viewed on the Internet at web site dms.dot.gov. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the application will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below. Comment closing date: March 9, 1998. (49 U.S.C. 30113; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8) Issued on February 2, 1998. L. Robert Shelton, Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards. [FR Doc. 98-2997 Filed 2-5-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P