Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention; Procedures for Selecting Lines Subject to Theft Prevention Standard |
---|
Topics: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
|
Christopher A. Hart
Federal Register
April 26, 1994
[Federal Register: April 26, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 542 [Docket No. 93--53; Notice 2] RIN 2127-AE67 Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention; Procedures for Selecting Lines Subject to Theft Prevention Standard AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule amends the procedures for the selection of new passenger motor vehicle lines that are likely to be high theft lines. For all Model Year (MY) 1997 and later vehicles, manufacturers must, 15 months in advance of the model year of introduction, inform NHTSA about new motor vehicle lines that the manufacturers plan to introduce for sale. Manufacturers must include an analysis whether the new line is likely to be a high or low theft line. The effect of this final rule is to make the procedures consistent with statutory requirements. DATES: Effective date: This final rule is effective May 26, 1994. Petitions for Reconsideration: Petitions for reconsideration of this final rule must be received by NHTSA no later than May 26, 1994. ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration of this final rule should refer to the docket number and notice number cited in the heading of this notice and be submitted to: Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara A. Gray, Office of Market Incentives, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Gray's telephone number is (202) 366-1740. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Motor Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984 The Motor Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98- 547) (Theft Act), added title VI to the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (Cost Savings Act). Pursuant to title VI, NHTSA promulgated 49 CFR part 541, titled ``Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard.'' Part 541 establishes performance requirements for inscribing or affixing identification numbers onto certain major original equipment and replacement parts of high theft lines of passenger motor vehicles. Section 603(a)(2) of title VI states that the specific lines, and the major parts of the vehicles within such lines, that are to be subject to the theft prevention standard may be selected by agreement between a manufacturer and the agency. If the agency and manufacturer disagree as to the selection, the selection is made by the agency, after providing notice to the manufacturer and an opportunity for written comment. Section 603(c) states that NHTSA ``shall, by rule, require each manufacturer to provide information necessary to select pursuant to subsection (a)(2) the high theft lines and major parts to be subject to the standard.'' (Emphasis added.) However, as promulgated on August 28, 1985 (50 FR 34831), the agency's regulations regarding the selection of high theft lines did not require the submission of such information. Those regulations, which are contained in part 542, simply set forth the procedures to be followed by those manufacturers which voluntarily choose to provide the information and to participate in the selection process. Since the establishment of part 542, some manufacturers have not consistently notified the agency about the introduction of new lines within the specified time frame of 18 to 24 months before introduction of each new line. On occasion, delayed notification by manufacturers has prevented the agency from making its preliminary determination sufficiently in advance of the introduction of such lines to permit application of the theft prevention standard to those lines during their introductory model year. To be subject to the standard in its introductory year, a line must be finally selected as high theft not less than 6 months before the beginning of that model year. In some instances, the agency has had to act on its own initiative by anticipating the introduction of new lines and making high theft/low theft determinations because the manufacturers did not notify the agency within the specified period of 18 to 24 months before the introduction of their new lines. In making these determinations, the agency has relied on reports in the trade press about planned introductions of new lines. Notwithstanding the absence of notification from the manufacturers, the manufacturers objected to this practice, viewing such agency initiative as an attempt to second guess them about the timing of the introduction of new model lines, or to reduce their opportunity to provide input regarding the determination. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking On July 21, 1993, NHTSA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend part 542 (See 58 FR 38999). In order to solve the problem of manufacturers' late notification of the agency about new lines, the agency proposed to implement section 603(c) of the Cost Savings Act. Under the proposal, each manufacturer would be required to provide, for each of its newly planned lines, its determination whether the line was likely high or low theft, and include a discussion of how it applied the criteria set forth in appendix C of part 541, in arriving at its determination. The appendix C criteria are: Price; vehicle image; lines competitive with the new line; line(s) the new line is intended to replace; presence of any antitheft devices; preliminary theft data for the line, if available. The agency also proposed that a manufacturer be required to submit such information not less than 18 months before introduction of the planned line. In the NPRM, NHTSA stated it believed that requiring manufacturers to submit the necessary information would provide the agency with more timely submissions of accurate and up-to-date data to evaluate. This would enable the agency to select more effectively and efficiently (by agreement with the manufacturer, if possible) those new lines likely to have a high theft rate. Also, since the information would be provided timely and directly to the agency by the manufacturer, the agency presumably would no longer need to rely upon the trade press accounts. In order to provide manufacturers with lead time to comply with the new mandatory procedures, the agency proposed to continue to permit voluntary submission of information for lines that are introduced before model year 1997, and require compliance with the mandatory procedures for those lines introduced in model year 1997 and subsequent model years. The agency made similar proposals regarding the voluntary and mandatory submission of information with respect to low theft new lines with a majority of major parts interchangeable with those of a high theft line. NHTSA also proposed to remove outdated procedures from part 542. The procedures were applicable to lines introduced before April 24, 1986, the effective date of the theft prevention standard. Finally, in the NPRM, NHTSA noted that because of passage of the ``Anti Car Theft Act of 1992'' (ACTA), changes must be made in NHTSA's and manufacturers' evaluation procedures for low theft lines with major parts interchangeable with major parts of a high theft line. ACTA's passage redefined ``passenger motor vehicle,'' for title VI purposes, to include ``any multipurpose passenger vehicle and light-duty truck that is rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or less.'' (See section 601(1) of title VI.) ACTA's passage did not necessitate changes to part 542's regulatory text. Public Comments and NHTSA Response In response to the NPRM, NHTSA received comments from four parties: The Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler); the Ford Motor Company (Ford); the National Truck Equipment Association (NTEA) and Volkswagen of America, Inc. (VW). In its comments, Ford concurred with NHTSA's proposal to require manufacturers to provide NHTSA with information and supporting analysis on new vehicle lines, beginning with Model Year 1997. Ford stated that it understood the NPRM as indicating that NHTSA is interested only in manufacturers' analyses of new vehicle lines likely to be high theft lines. Based on its understanding, Ford suggested that there was a need to make several minor changes to the regulatory text to make it clear that NHTSA is interested in analyses of new lines likely to be low theft, as well as those lines likely to be high theft. NHTSA believes that the proposal was clear regarding the obligation for a manufacturer to conduct evaluations of each new line using the criteria in appendix C of part 541. Under the proposal, each manufacturer would have been required ``to evaluate each new line and to conclude whether the new line is likely to have a theft rate exceeding the median theft rate.'' In other words, for each line, the manufacturer would have had to indicate whether its evaluation led it to conclude that (a) it is likely to have such a rate or (b) it is not likely to have such a rate. That this was the intended reading of the proposed regulatory text was made abundantly clear in the summary section of the NPRM preamble. There, the agency stated that manufacturers would be required to ``provide an analysis whether the new line is likely to be a high or low theft line.'' Nevertheless, NHTSA has no objection to making the changes suggested by Ford. Section 542.1(c), Procedures for newly introduced vehicle lines, now explicitly states that the manufacturers are to follow the procedures in evaluating whether a new line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the median theft rate. Chrysler and VW recommended that the deadline for manufacturers notifying NHTSA of new lines be 12 months before the introduction of the line, instead of 18 months before the introduction, as proposed in the NPRM. Both Chrysler and VW stated that, since the American automobile market is very competitive, manufacturers may decide to introduce new lines with less than 18 months' lead time. They argued that being allowed to inform NHTSA of new car lines 12 months in advance would provide more flexibility to the manufacturers. VW further stated that if NHTSA amended part 542, and issued its preliminary determinations of high or low theft sooner than the 90 days presently provided in part 542, manufacturers could file new vehicle line information with NHTSA as late as 10 months in advance of introduction of the line. Both the VW and Chrysler objections to the 18 month advance notice requirement are apparently based on the possibility that each may wish to introduce a new line in the U.S. with less than 18 months' notice. In the 8 years since part 542 took effect, NHTSA has been notified of a new line less than 18 months before the introduction model year in only a few instances. No manufacturers, besides VW and Chrysler, objected to the 18 month lead time requirement. NHTSA has carefully considered Chrysler and Volkswagen's comments, and calculated the latest date on which it can accept new line information. For reasons explained below, NHTSA needs to issue final determinations of high or low theft, at least six months in advance of the manufacturer's model year. NHTSA has decided that it can accept new line information as late as 15 months before the beginning of the manufacturer's model year, and still issue final determinations six months before the beginning of the model year. Thus, beginning with model year 1997 vehicles, manufacturers are required to notify NHTSA of new lines 15 months before the new line is introduced. NHTSA has not shortened part 542's timeframe for NHTSA's preliminary and final determinations since that is beyond the scope of notice of the NPRM. NHTSA needs to issue determinations six months in advance of the model year because under section 603(a)(3) of the Theft Act, NHTSA must, to the maximum extent practicable, assure that likely high theft lines are selected at least 6 months before the first applicable model year, to notify manufacturers that they must mark the major parts of the line. More importantly, if NHTSA issues a final high theft determination less than six months before an upcoming model year, NHTSA cannot require the manufacturer to mark the parts of the high theft line during that model year. Instead, it cannot mandate parts marking until the following model year. Requiring manufacturers to submit information 15 months (instead of 12 months) before the model year would lessen the likelihood of NHTSA's missing the 6 month deadline to notify manufacturers, before the first applicable model year, of the high theft status of a new line. NHTSA does not believe requiring manufacturers to submit information 15 months in advance of the model year would pose a hardship. NHTSA does not believe that any of the information to be reported (specified at appendix C of part 541) is detailed or complex. The appendix C criteria are: Price; vehicle image; lines competitive with the new line; line(s) the new line is intended to replace; presence of any antitheft devices; and any preliminary theft data for the line. NHTSA believes that a manufacturer planning a new line for sale in the U.S. knows, 15 months before the model year of introduction, fundamental information about the new line, including that specified in appendix C, and would have no difficulty in reporting it. NHTSA believes further that even if, on some occasion, a manufacturer does not make a formal decision to introduce a new line until some time after 15 months in advance of the model year of introduction, the manufacturer must be very actively entertaining, at the 15 month point, the possibility of making such a decision in the next several months. The commercial and regulatory logistics involved in introducing a new line to the U.S. market are complex. The very complexity of this process necessitates that, by 15 months in advance of the model year of introduction, the manufacturers have a good idea whether they will introduce a new line into the United States. If, 15 months before the introduction of a new line, a manufacturer is still undecided whether to introduce the line, it could nevertheless comply with part 542 by sending a letter to NHTSA stating that it may introduce a new line and providing the information specified in appendix C of part 542. To avoid the possibility of a disclosure of its potential plans, the manufacturer may request confidential treatment for the letter. NHTSA has determined that future specific model plans would presumptively be likely to result in substantial competitive harm if disclosed to the public, before the date on which the specific model is first offered for sale. (See 49 CFR part 512, appendix B.) If confidential treatment has been granted, and the manufacturer decides not to introduce the line, NHTSA will not disclose the contents of the letter. Finally, NHTSA decided to set the deadline for submission of information about new lines at the 15 month point instead of at the 12 month point because 15 months is necessary not only to allow NHTSA time to issue a final determination, but also to allow manufacturers enough time to submit timely petitions for exemption from marking the parts of a new line. Section 605(b) of the Theft Act specifies that petitions for exemption must be filed ``not later than 8 months before the commencement of production for the first model year covered by the petition.'' The National Truck Equipment Association (NTEA) expressed concern that NHTSA may consider some of its members (which are primarily small final stage manufacturers of incomplete vehicles, or alterers of vehicles) to be ``manufacturers'' for part 542 purposes, and thus subject to the reporting requirements. These final stage manufacturers and alterers appear to work on individual vehicles, adapting each vehicle for a special purpose or to otherwise include features that make each vehicle unique to the customer's needs. NTEA noted, however, that because ACTA's definition of light-duty trucks and multipurpose passenger vehicles is limited to vehicles weighing 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating or less, NTEA expects ``very few vehicles'' completed or altered by its members to be subject to part 542. For the following reasons, NHTSA does not believe that final stage manufacturers or alterers, are ``manufacturers'' for part 542 purposes. Part 542 applies to a manufacturer that groups motor vehicle models of the same make together and assigns names to the groups, i.e., lines, or introduces new motor vehicle lines into commerce. Neither final stage manufacturers nor alterers do these things. The grouping of motor vehicle models of the same make together and assigning names to the groups, i.e., lines, is done at an earlier stage of manufacture in the case of both incomplete motor vehicles that are completed by final stage manufacturers and of completed vehicles that are modified by alterers. These circumstances are reflected in the agency's requirements concerning vehicle identification numbers. A vehicle identification number (VIN) is a seventeen character series of arabic numbers and roman letters which is assigned to a motor vehicle for identification purposes. Manufacturers must comply with Standard No. 115; Vehicle identification number-basic requirements. S4.1 of Standard No. 115 states: Each vehicle manufactured in one stage shall have a VIN that is assigned by the manufacturer. Each vehicle manufactured in more than one stage shall have a VIN assigned by the incomplete vehicle manufacturer. Vehicle alterers * * * shall utilize the VIN assigned by the original manufacturer of the vehicle. 49 CFR part 565 Vehicle identification number-content requirements, specifies the format and content for VINs. Among other VIN attributes, the first three characters uniquely identify the manufacturer, make and type of motor vehicle. (See Sec. 565.4(a)) Included as VIN attributes for passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and incomplete vehicles, are the line and series of the vehicle. (See Sec. 565.4(b), and table I) A manufacturer must, when it assigns a VIN to a motor vehicle, determine the model or ``line,'' and series of the vehicle. For these reasons, when it creates a VIN, a manufacturer is in effect, determining the ``line'' of vehicles that it introduces into commerce. The manufacturing functions of the NTEA members are performed after the VINs are assigned. As noted above, they either do final stage manufacturing of incomplete vehicles or alter completed vehicles. Standard No. 115 prohibits final stage manufacturers or alterers from making changes to the original VIN assigned to the vehicle. The final stage manufacturers or alterers cannot change any VIN attribute, including the VIN attribute that describes the ``line'' of the vehicle. Since the final stage manufacturers or alterers, in effect, cannot assign the ``name'' to a ``group'' of vehicles, i.e., the ``line'', the final stage manufacturers or alterers are not ``manufacturers'' for purposes of part 542. Finally, since there were no objections to NHTSA's proposal to remove outdated references to vehicle lines introduced before April 24, 1986, the final rule adopts those amendments. Regulatory Impacts A. Costs and Other Impacts This notice was not reviewed under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review). NHTSA has analyzed the impact of this rulemaking action and determined that it is not ``significant'' within the meaning of the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures. The agency estimates this final rule will impose minimal reporting costs on manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles. The agency estimates that the average annual cost per manufacturer per year to report on new vehicle lines is $2,000. The agency estimates that the cost to all affected manufacturers totals $56,000 per year. The Supplementary Information section of this notice discussed the ``Anti Car Theft Act of 1992's'' redefinition of ``passenger motor vehicle'' to include ``any multipurpose passenger vehicle and light- duty truck that is rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or less.'' Thus, manufacturers may now have to follow part 542 procedures for certain multipurpose passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks. The burden on these manufacturers will be minimal because relatively few new lines of light-duty trucks and multipurpose passenger vehicles are introduced in any year. The additional burden on manufacturers with respect to passenger cars as a result of reporting becoming mandatory will also be minimal. Most manufacturers are already providing new car line information on a voluntary basis. For these reasons, NHTSA believes that the additional costs will be so minimal as not to warrant preparation of a full regulatory evaluation. Since there will be so little additional reporting cost, NHTSA does not believe that this rule will affect the impacts described in the regulatory evaluation (pursuant to E.O. 12291 and the DOT's regulatory policies) prepared for the proposal published May 10, 1985 (See 50 FR 19728, at 19741) setting forth the substantive requirements of part 541. Interested persons may wish to examine that regulatory evaluation. Copies of that evaluation have been placed in Docket No. T84-01; Notice 4, and may be obtained by writing to: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Docket Section, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590. B. Small Business Impacts The agency has also considered the effects of this rulemaking action under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). I certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rationale for this certification is that, as noted above, the reporting costs will be minimal. Further, almost none of the manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles that will be subject to this rule is considered to be a small business, a small non-profit organization, or a small governmental entity as defined by the SBA. C. Environmental Impacts In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the agency has considered the environmental impacts of this rule and determined that, the final rule will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. D. Paperwork Reduction Act The procedures in this rule for manufacturers to submit new vehicle line information to NHTSA are considered to be information collection requirements, as that term is defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in 5 CFR part 1320. The information collection requirements for part 542 have been submitted to and approved by the OMB pursuant to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) This collection of information has been assigned OMB Control No. 2127-0539 (``Procedures for selecting lines to be covered by the theft prevention standard'') and has been approved for use through August 31, 1995. E. Federalism This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined that the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism assessment. F. Civil Justice Reform This final rule does not have any retroactive effect, and it does not preempt any State law. Section 613 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (15 U.S.C. 2020), provides that judicial review of this rule may be obtained pursuant to section 504 of the Cost Savings Act, (15 U.S.C. 2004). The Cost Savings Act does not require submission of a petition for reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 542 Administrative practice and procedure, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, reporting requirements. In consideration of the foregoing, 49 CFR part 542 is revised to read as follows: PART 542--PROCEDURES FOR SELECTING LINES TO BE COVERED BY THE THEFT PREVENTION STANDARD Sec. 542.1 Procedures for selecting new lines that are likely to have high or low theft rates. 542.2 Procedures for selecting low theft new lines with a majority of major parts interchangeable with those of a high theft line. Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2021, 2022, and 2023; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Sec. 542.1 Procedures for selecting new lines that are likely to have high or low theft rates. (a) Scope. This section sets forth the procedures for motor vehicle manufacturers and NHTSA to follow in the determination of whether any new vehicle line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the median theft rate. (b) Application. These procedures apply to each manufacturer that plans to introduce a new line into commerce in the United States on or after April 24, 1986, and to each of those new lines. (c) Procedures. (1)(i) For each new line introduced before the 1997 model year, each manufacturer uses the criteria in appendix C of part 541 of this chapter to evaluate each new line and to conclude whether the new line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the median theft rate established for calendar years 1990 and 1991. (ii) For each new line to be introduced for the 1997 or subsequent model years, each manufacturer shall use the criteria in appendix C of part 541 of this chapter to evaluate each new line and to conclude whether the new line is likely to have a theft rate above or below the median theft rate. (2)(i) For each new line to be introduced before the 1997 model year, the manufacturer submits its evaluations and conclusions made under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, together with the underlying factual information, to NHTSA not less than 18 months before the date of introduction. The manufacturer may request a meeting with the agency to further explain the bases for its evaluations and conclusions. (ii) For each new line to be introduced for the 1997 or subsequent model years, the manufacturer shall submit its evaluations and conclusions made under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, together with the underlying factual information, to NHTSA not less than 15 months before the date of introduction. The manufacturer may request a meeting with the agency during this period to further explain the bases for its evaluations and conclusions. (3) Within 90 days after its receipt of the manufacturer's submission under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the agency independently evaluates the new line using the criteria in appendix C of part 541 of this chapter and, on a preliminary basis, determines whether the new line should or should not be subject to Sec. 541.2 of this chapter. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of the agency's evaluations and determinations, together with the factual information considered by the agency in making them. (4) The manufacturer may request the agency to reconsider any of its preliminary determinations made under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. The manufacturer shall submit its request to the agency within 30 days of its receipt of the letter under paragraph (c)(3) of this section. The request shall include the facts and arguments underlying the manufacturer's objections to the agency's preliminary determinations. During this 30-day period, the manufacturer may also request a meeting with the agency to discuss those objections. (5) Each of the agency's preliminary determinations under paragraph (c)(3) of this section shall become final 45 days after the agency sends the letter specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section unless a request for reconsideration has been received in accordance with paragraph (c)(4) of this section. If such a request has been received, the agency makes its final determinations within 60 days of its receipt of the request. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of those determinations and its response to the request for reconsideration. Sec. 542.2 Procedures for selecting low theft new lines with a majority of major parts interchangeable with those of a high theft line. (a) Scope. This section sets forth the procedures for motor vehicle manufacturers and NHTSA to follow in the determination of whether any new lines that will be likely to have a low theft rate have major parts interchangeable with a majority of the covered major parts of a line having or likely to have a high theft rate. (b) Application. These procedures apply to: (1) Each manufacturer that produces-- (i) At least one passenger motor vehicle line that has been or will be introduced into commerce in the United States and that has been listed in appendix A of part 541 of this chapter or that has been identified by the manufacturer or preliminarily or finally determined by NHTSA to be a high-theft line under Sec. 542.1, and (ii) At least one passenger motor vehicle line that will be introduced into commerce in the United States on or after April 24, 1986 and that the manufacturer identifies as likely to have a theft rate below the median theft rate; and (2) Each of those likely submedian theft rate lines. (c) Procedures. (1)(i) For each new line that is to be introduced before the 1997 model year and that a manufacturer identifies under appendix C of part 541 of this chapter as likely to have a theft rate below the median rate, the manufacturer identifies how many and which of the major parts of that line will be interchangeable with the covered major parts of any other of its lines that has been listed in appendix A of part 541 of this chapter or identified by the manufacturer or preliminarily or finally determined by the agency to be a high theft line under Sec. 542.1. (ii) For each new line that is to be introduced in the 1997 or subsequent model years and that a manufacturer identifies under appendix C of part 541 of this chapter as likely to have a theft rate below the median rate, the manufacturer shall identify how many and which of the major parts of that line will be interchangeable with the covered major parts of any other of its lines that has been listed in appendix A of part 541 of this chapter or identified by the manufacturer or preliminarily or finally determined by the agency to be a high-theft line under Sec. 542.1. (2)(i) If the manufacturer concludes that a new line that is to be introduced before the 1997 model year has a likely submedian theft rate and will have major parts that are interchangeable with a majority of the covered major parts of a high theft line, the manufacturer determines whether all the vehicles of those lines with likely submedian theft rates and interchangeable parts will account for more than 90 percent of the total annual production of all of the manufacturer's lines with those interchangeable parts. (ii) If the manufacturer concludes that a new line that is to be introduced for the 1997 or subsequent model years has a likely submedian theft rate and will have major parts that are interchangeable with a majority of the covered major parts of a high theft line, the manufacturer shall determine whether all the vehicles of those lines with likely submedian theft rates and interchangeable parts will account for more than 90 percent of the total annual production of all of the manufacturer's lines with those interchangeable parts. (3)(i) For new lines to be introduced before the 1997 model year, the manufacturer submits its evaluations and identifications made under paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (2)(i) of this section, together with the underlying factual information, to NHTSA not less than 18 months before the date of introduction. During this period, the manufacturer may request a meeting with the agency to further explain the bases for its evaluations and conclusions. (ii) For new lines to be introduced for the 1997 and subsequent model years, the manufacturer shall submit its evaluations and conclusions made under paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (2)(ii) of this section, together with the underlying factual information, to NHTSA not less than 15 months before the date of introduction. During this period, the manufacturer may request a meeting with the agency to further explain the bases for its evaluations and conclusions. (4) Within 90 days after its receipt of the manufacturer's submission under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the agency considers that submission, if any, and independently makes, on a preliminary basis, the determinations of those lines with likely submedian theft rates which should or should not be subject to Sec. 541.5 of this chapter. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of the agency's preliminary determinations, together with the factual information considered by the agency in making them. (5) The manufacturer may request the agency to reconsider any of its preliminary determinations made under paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The manufacturer must submit its request to the agency within 30 days of its receipt of the letter under paragraph (c)(4) of this section informing it of the agency's evaluations and preliminary determinations. The request must include the facts and arguments underlying the manufacturer's objections to the agency's preliminary determinations. During this 30-day period, the manufacturer may also request a meeting with the agency to discuss those objections. (6) Each of the agency's preliminary determinations made under paragraph (c)(4) of this section becomes final 45 days after the agency sends the letter specified in that paragraph unless a request for reconsideration has been received in accordance with paragraph (c)(5) of this section. If such a request has been received, the agency makes its final determinations within 60 days of its receipt of the request. NHTSA informs the manufacturer by letter of those determinations and its response to the request for reconsideration. Issued on: April 21, 1994. Christopher A. Hart, Deputy Administrator. [FR Doc. 94-10040 Filed 4-25-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P