Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Lighting Devices, Reflectors, and Electrical Equipment |
---|
|
Rodney E. Slater
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Register
January 19, 1994
[Federal Register: January 19, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration 49 CFR Part 393 [FHWA Docket No. MC-94-1] RIN 2125-AD27 Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Lighting Devices, Reflectors, and Electrical Equipment AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM); request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document announces that the FHWA is considering proposing measures for reducing the incidence and severity of collisions with large trailers during conditions of darkness or reduced visibility. Specifically, the agency is considering issuing a proposal to establish requirements for the use of retroreflective sheeting or reflex reflectors for certain trailers manufactured prior to December 1, 1993, the effective date of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's final rule on conspicuity for newly manufactured trailers. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 21, 1994. ADDRESSES: Submit written, signed comments to FHWA Docket No. MC-94-1, room 4232, HCC-10, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. All comments received will be available for examination at the above address from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except legal Federal holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey J. Van Ness, Office of Motor Carrier Standards, (202) 366-2981, or Mr. Charles E. Medalen, Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1354, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except legal Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 10, 1992, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published a final rule (49 CFR 571.108) requiring that trailers manufactured on or after December 1, 1993, which have an overall width of 80 inches or more and a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 10,000 pounds, be equipped on the sides and rear with means for making them more visible on the road.1 Trailers manufactured exclusively for use as offices or dwellings are exempt. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\A copy of the NHTSA final rule and NPRM are included for inspection and copying in FHWA Docket No. MC-94-1, room 4232, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trailer manufacturers may install either retroreflective sheeting or reflex reflectors. Manufacturers of retroreflective sheeting or reflectors are required to certify compliance of their product with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108 (49 CFR 571.108) whether the product is for use as original or as replacement equipment. NHTSA Rulemaking The NHTSA first requested comments concerning the use of reflective material to make heavy vehicles more visible on May 27, 1980 (45 FR 35405). Forty-two comments were received, most of which favored the concept. Between 1980 and 1985, the NHTSA conducted a fleet study in which retroreflective material was placed on van-trailer combinations in a manner designed to increase their conspicuity during conditions of darkness or reduced visibility. The treatment of trailers consisted of outlining the rear perimeter, and delineating the lower side. No reflectorized mud flaps were used. The study concluded that truck- trailer combinations equipped with this material were involved in 15 percent fewer crashes (in which a trailer was struck in the side or rear) than combinations lacking the material. A copy of the report, ``Improved Commercial Vehicle Conspicuity and Signalling Systems--Task III Field Test Evaluation of Vehicle Reflectorization Effectiveness,'' September 1985 (DOT HS 806 923) is included in the docket. On September 18, 1987 (52 FR 35345), the NHTSA published a notice of request for comments. The notice presented results of NHTSA's fleet study and sought comments on the test results as well as experiences motor carriers may have had with the use of reflective material to enhance conspicuity. Thirty-seven comments were received, most agreeing that a 15 percent reduction in accidents could be expected when all large vehicles were so equipped with reflective material. As part of the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1990 (sec. 15, Pub. L. 101-500, 104 Stat. 1218), the Congress included a provision directing the Secretary of Transportation ``to initiate a rulemaking proceeding on the need to adopt methods for making trucks or any category of trucks more visible to motorists * * *'' not later than February 3, 1991, and to complete the rulemaking proceeding not later than November 3, 1992. On December 4, 1991, the NHTSA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) at 56 FR 63474. The NHTSA regarded its NPRM as responsive to the congressional mandate and the final rule as the completion of the rulemaking. Prior to the issuance of the final rule, the NHTSA published the results of additional research on heavy vehicle conspicuity. The purpose of the research program was to define a range of minimally acceptable large vehicle conspicuity enhancements that could be used as a basis for revised Federal regulations. A number of laboratory and field studies were carried out to assess the value of using a pattern in the marking material, the form the pattern should take, the placement of the treatment on the trailer, the effect of retroreflective markings on the detection and identification of stop and turn signals, and the trade-off between the width and retroreflective intensity of the treatment material. In addition, field surveys were conducted to assess the effect of environmental dirt on the performance of the marking systems and the durability of retroreflective materials when used on trucks. The results of the research support the red and white pattern, retroreflective intensity and width of materials in NHTSA's final rule. With regard to durability, the study indicated on page 166 that: The typical service life of a trailer is estimated at 14 years. It would be desirable that retroreflective treatments provide adequate performance for at least that long. The limited data collected * * * indicate that it is possible to use retroreflective materials in a trucking environment and suffer very little, if any loss in performance for ten or more years * * *. Until more definitive data are available, it is recommended that performance loss due to aging be established at 80 percent retention over the fourteen-year period. Relationship Between FHWA and NHTSA Requirements for Lamps and Reflective Devices The NHTSA is responsible for establishing manufacturing standards for motor vehicles. Manufacturers of motor vehicles and certain motor vehicle equipment must certify that their products meet all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSSs). The standards for lamps and reflective devices are contained under FMVSS No. 108 (49 CFR 571.108). The FHWA is responsible for establishing standards for commercial motor vehicles used in interstate commerce. Commercial motor vehicles subject to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations must meet the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 393 (Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation) and 396 (Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance). Generally, part 393 does not establish vehicle or equipment manufacturing standards per se, but rather establishes requirements for certain equipment necessary for the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles. The requirements for lamps and reflective devices are contained under Secs. 393.11 through 393.26. The requirements in Secs. 393.11 through 393.26 are generally consistent with the manufacturing standards in FMVSS No. 108. Manufacturers are required to equip newly manufactured commercial motor vehicles in accordance with FMVSS No. 108. Commercial motor vehicles subject to the FMCSRs must be equipped with lamps and reflective devices as required under part 393. Current FMCSRs Requirement for Conspicuity Treatment Section 393.11 requires that all lighting devices on motor vehicles placed in operation after March 7, 1989, meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 108 in effect at the time the vehicle is manufactured. Therefore, trailers manufactured on or after December 1, 1993, the effective date of the FMVSS No. 108 requirement for retroreflective tape or reflex reflectors, must have such reflective devices of the type and in the locations specified in FMVSS No. 108. Request for Comments The FHWA specifically requests comments that address the application of conspicuity requirements to trailers manufactured before December 1, 1993. In a separate rulemaking, the FHWA will discuss maintenance and testing of conspicuity treatments on trailers manufactured on or after December 1, 1993. The FHWA made a distinction between the two categories of vehicles because the technical and economic issues associated with the consideration of retrofitting trailers with the conspicuity treatment are much more complex than those associated with a requirement that motor carriers maintain the conspicuity treatment with which the trailer was originally equipped. The FHWA requests that commenters address the specific issues below. However, the FHWA encourages commenters to include a discussion of any other issues that the commenters believe are relevant to this rulemaking. 1. Many motor carriers have been using retroreflective sheeting or reflex reflectors which are not of the colors, retroreflective intensity, width, or configuration of the conspicuity treatment in the NHTSA's final rule. The FHWA seeks information on the type of conspicuity treatments in use and quantitative data on the cost and effectiveness of those treatments in preventing and/or mitigating accidents. 2. What types of technical problems (e.g., tape not adhering to the surface of the trailer) have motor carriers encountered when applying conspicuity materials to in-service trailers? Are any problems unique to certain types of trailers, or to certain types of paints, coatings, or surfaces? 3. What is the approximate cost (parts and labor) to apply conspicuity treatments to trailers? Is special training required for employees performing this task? What cost differences may exist between having this task performed by the motor carrier's own maintenance department or by third parties? 4. How long must a trailer be taken out of service to have the conspicuity material applied to its surfaces? 5. With regard to conspicuity treatments that differ from those in the NHTSA final rule, a retrofitting requirement could result in many motor carriers having to replace their current conspicuity treatments with one that is consistent with the requirements of FMVSS No. 108. The FHWA believes that some form of conspicuity treatment (even certain forms which may be less effective than that covered in the NHTSA's final rule) is better than no conspicuity treatment. What different types of conspicuity treatment are currently being used by motor carriers? What results have been experienced by motor carriers using conspicuity treatments? 6. If this rulemaking proceeds, should the FHWA propose requiring the same red/white color combination, retroreflective intensity, width and configuration as the NHTSA's final rule, or should alternative requirements be considered? If alternatives are considered, do commenters foresee problems in the enforcement of a retrofitting requirement? 7. If this rulemaking proceeds, should the FHWA consider an effective date which is several (2, 3, 4, or 5) years after the date of publication of the final rule? Rulemaking Analysis and Notices All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available for examination in the docket room at the above address. Comments received after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments, the FHWA will also continue to file in the docket relevant information that becomes available after the comment closing date, and interested persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures The FHWA has determined that this action is not a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 or significant within the meaning of Department of Transportation regulatory policies and procedures. Due to the preliminary nature of this document and lack of necessary information on costs, the FHWA is unable to evaluate the economic impact of the potential regulatory changes being considered in this rulemaking. Based on the information received in response to this notice, the FHWA intends to carefully consider the costs and benefits associated with various alternative requirements. Comments, information, and data are solicited on the economic impact of the potential changes. Regulatory Flexibility Act Due to the preliminary nature of this document and lack of necessary information on costs, the FHWA is unable to evaluate the effects of the potential regulatory changes on small entities. Based on the information received in response to this notice, the FHWA intends, in compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), to carefully consider the economic impacts of these potential changes on small entities. The FHWA solicits comments, information, and data on these impacts. Executive Order 12612 (Federalism Assessment) This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined that this action does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review) Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.217, Motor Carrier Safety. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not contain a collection of information requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. National Environmental Policy Act The agency has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and has determined that this action would not have any effect on the quality of the environment. Regulation Identification Number A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of this document can be used to cross reference this action with the Unified Agenda. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 392 and 393 Highways and roads, Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 3102; 49 U.S.C. app. 2505; 49 CFR 1.48; sec. 15(f); Public Law 101-500, 104 Stat. 1220 (1990). Issued on: January 11, 1994. Rodney E. Slater, Federal Highway Administrator. [FR Doc. 94-1211 Filed 1-18-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-22-P