Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages |
---|
Topics: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
|
Patricia P. Breslin
Federal Register
July 13, 1994
[Federal Register: July 13, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 571 [Docket No. 94-57; Notice 01] RIN 2127-AF33 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of Proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice proposes to amend Standard No. 210 to require the installation of anchorages for either a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly at any seating position for which Standard No. 208 requires the installation of a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt. Anchorages required by Standard No. 210 must meet the strength, location and other performance requirements of that standard. Currently, S4.1.2 of Standard No. 210 requires the installation of an anchorage for a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly for all designated seating positions, except positions already required by section 4.1.1 of Standard No. 210 to have an anchorage for a Type 2 seat belt assembly and except passenger seats in buses. The practical effect of Standard No. 210's not requiring anchorages for the bus passenger seats is that the anchorages for the Type 1 seat belt assemblies required at passenger seats in small buses are not currently required to comply with the performance requirements of that Standard. This notice will correct this oversight. DATES: Comment date: Comments must be received by September 12, 1994. Proposed effective date: If adopted, the proposed amendments would become effective 30 days following publication of the final rule. ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice number of this notice and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. (Docket Room hours are 9:30 a.m.-4 p.m., Monday through Friday.) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Clarke Harper, Office of Vehicle Safety Standards, NRM-12, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-4916. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 2, 1989, NHTSA published a final rule amending Standard No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection, to require the installation of Type 2 (lap/shoulder) seat belts at all forward- facing rear outboard seating positions in all vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,000 pounds or less, other than school buses (54 FR 46257). The final rule also required Type 2 seat belts at all front outboard seating positions in small buses and Type 1 (lap) seat belts at all other seating positions in small buses. In the preamble to the final rule, effective September 1, 1991, the agency stated that it did not need to amend Standard No. 210, Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, to require the installation of anchorages for Type 2 seat belt assemblies at the affected seating positions because S4.1.1 already required the installation of anchorages for a Type 2 seat belt assembly whenever Standard No. 208 required the installation of a Type 2 seat belt. In making this statement, the agency overlooked the exceptions in S4.1.2 of Standard No. 210. That section requires the installation of anchorages for a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly for all designated seating positions, except positions required to have an anchorage for a Type 2 seat belt assembly and except for passenger seats in buses. Thus, the anchorages for the Type 1 seat belt assemblies required at passenger seats in small buses by the November 2, 1989 final rule are not currently required to comply with Standard No. 210. To correct this oversight, this notice proposes to amend Standard No. 210 to require the installation of anchorages for either a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly at any seating position for which Standard No. 208 requires the installation of a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt. Since NHTSA believes that the anchorages currently being installed by the manufacturers comply with the requirements of Standard No. 210, NHTSA is proposing that if this proposal is adopted as a final rule, it would become effective 30 days after publication. The agency proposes to simplify the language of S4.1 and to reword it to eliminate the possibility of similar oversights in the future. The proposed regulatory language in this notice combines the requirements of current S4.1.1 and S4.1.2 into one section. Further, it makes clear that anchorages for either a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly are required whenever Standard No. 208 requires either a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly. This change will eliminate the need for further amendment of Standard No. 210 if the seat belt requirements of Standard No. 208 are amended in the future. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures This rulemaking document was not reviewed under E.O. 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures and determined that the action is not ``significant'' under those policies and procedures. While these anchorages are not currently required to comply with Standard No. 210, NHTSA believes that manufacturers do design these anchorages to comply with these requirements. Thus, NHTSA does not expect any impact from this proposed rule. Therefore, preparation of a full regulatory evaluation is not warranted. Regulatory Flexibility Act NHTSA has also considered the impacts of this notice under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. I hereby certify that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As explained above, NHTSA does not anticipate any impact from this proposed rule. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (P.L. 96- 511), there are no requirements for information collection associated with this proposed rule. National Environmental Policy Act NHTSA has also analyzed this proposed rule under the National Environmental Policy Act and determined that it would not have a significant impact on the human environment. Executive Order 12612 (Federalism) NHTSA has analyzed this proposal in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 12612, and has determined that this proposed rule would not have significant federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Civil Justice Reform This proposed rule would not have any retroactive effect. Under 49 U.S.C. 30103, whenever a Federal motor vehicle safety standard is in effect, a State may not adopt or maintain a safety standard applicable to the same aspect of performance which is not identical to the Federal standard, except to the extent that the state requirement imposes a higher level of performance and applies only to vehicles procured for the State's use. 49 U.S.C. 30161 sets forth a procedure for judicial review of final rules establishing, amending or revoking Federal motor vehicle safety standards. This section does not require submission of a petition for reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court. Submission of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the proposal. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted. All comments must not exceed 15 pages in length. (49 CFR 553.21). Necessary attachments may be appended to these submissions without regard to the 15-page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage commenters to detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion. If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim of confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and seven copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been deleted should be submitted to the Docket Section. A request for confidentiality should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth the information specified in the agency's confidential business information regulation. 49 CFR Part 512. All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above for the proposal will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Comments received too late for consideration in regard to the final rule will be considered as suggestions for further rulemaking action. Comments on the proposal will be available for inspection in the docket. The NHTSA will continue to file relevant information as it becomes available in the docket after the closing date, and it is recommended that interested persons continue to examine the docket for new material. Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their comments in the rules docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 571 Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles. In consideration of the foregoing, it is proposed that 49 CFR Part 571 be amended as follows: PART 571--FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS 1. The authority citation for Part 571 of Title 49 would be revised to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50. Sec. 571.210 [Amended] 2. Section 571.210 would be amended by revising S4.1.1, removing existing S4.1.2, redesignating existing S4.1.3(a) as S4.1.2(a) and redesignating existing S4.1.3(b) as S4.1.2(b) and revising it, to read as follows: Sec. 571.210 Standard No. 210; Seat belt assembly anchorages. * * * * * S4.1.1 Seat belt anchorages for a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly shall be installed for each designated seating position for which a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly is required by Standard No. 208 (49 CFR 571.208). Seat belt anchorages for a Type 2 seat belt assembly shall be installed for each designated seating position for which a Type 2 seat belt assembly is required by Standard No. 208 (49 CFR 571.208). S4.1.2(a) * * * (b) The requirement in S4.1.1 of this standard that seat belt anchorages for a Type 1 or a Type 2 seat belt assembly shall be installed for certain designated seating positions does not apply to any such seating positions that are equipped with a seat belt assembly that meets the frontal crash protection requirements of S5.1 of Standard No. 208 (49 CFR 571.208). * * * * * Issued on July 7, 1994. Patricia P. Breslin, Acting Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 94-16912 Filed 7-12-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P