Participation in the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Field Operational Test Program |
---|
Topics: Federal Highway Administration
|
Rodney E. Slater
Federal Register
November 21, 1994
[Federal Register: November 21, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Participation in the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Field Operational Test Program AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice; request for participation. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The DOT seeks offers from the public and private sectors to form partnerships to conduct operational tests in support of the national Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) program. This notice solicits offers to participate in operational tests that concentrate on evaluating the benefits of the following ITS user service areas: (1) International Border Electronic Clearance; (2) Automated Collision Notification; and (3) Intelligent Cruise Control. The intent of this notice is to assess, using the selection criteria set forth below, a proposed operational test's potential for contributing to the advancement of the national ITS program, the proposed technical and management approaches for the test, and the appropriateness of the proposed Federal role in the project. The selection criteria set forth in today's notice supersede the criteria presented in previous operational test notices. This notice has been developed by the FHWA in cooperation with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA). DATES: Operational test offers must be received on or before February 19, 1995. ADDRESSES: Offers to participate in the ITS operational test program should be submitted directly to the Federal Highway Administration, Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications, Operational Test Division, (HTV-20), 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For FHWA: Mr. George Schoene, Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications, Operational Test Division, HTV-20, (202) 366-6726; Mr. Steve Crane, Intelligent Transportation System/Commercial Vehicle Operations Team, HMT-10, (202) 366-0950; or Ms. Julie Dingle, FHWA Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-32, (202) 366- 0780. For NHTSA: Mr. August Burgett, NHTSA Office of Crash Avoidance Research, NRD-50, (202) 366-5672. For FTA: Mr. Denis Symes, FTA Office of Technical Assistance and Safety, TTS-30, (202) 366-0232. All of the agencies are located at 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20590. Office hours for the FHWA are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., for the NHTSA are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., for the FTA are from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ITS program involves a range of advanced technologies and system concepts that, when used in combination, can improve mobility and transportation productivity, enhance safety, maximize the use of existing transportation facilities, conserve energy resources, and reduce adverse environmental effects. These goals contribute significantly to the DOT's broader goal of developing a national intermodal transportation system for moving people and goods in a safe and energy-efficient manner. The ``Department of Transportation's Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems (IVHS) Strategic Plan'' (DOT Publication No. FHWA-SA-93-009) describes DOT's goals, objectives, and program delivery plans for research and development, operational testing, deployment, and long-term ITS development under the Automated Highway System program. Operational tests serve as the transition between research and development (R&D) and full scale deployment of IS technologies. An operational test integrates existing technology, R&D products, institutional, and perhaps regulatory arrangements to test one, and usually more, new technological, institutional, or financial elements in a real world test. The tests permit an evaluation of how well newly developed ITS technologies work under real operating conditions and assess the benefits and public support for the product or system. Operational tests are conducted in a ``real world'' operational highway environment under actual transportation conditions. This distinguishes operational tests from research projects or other kinds of testing, for example simulation testing, test tracks, or tests on facilities that are temporarily closed to the public. ITS operational tests are conducted as cooperative ventures between the DOT and a variety of public and private partners, including State and local governments, private companies, and universities. The ``Department of Transportation's IVHS Strategic Plan'' summarizes the roles of each participant in the National ITS Program and operational tests. The general Federal role is to act as a leader and a catalyst, and to ensure adequate emphasis on public benefits. The DOT also guides the design and conduct of the project evaluation to ensure that the project is independently evaluated on a national program scale. The participating DOT administrations, the FHWA, the NHTSA, the FTA, and the RSPA are involved in ITS and their specific ITS program needs will tailor the particular arrangements of the operational tests. The DOT is also developing a National ITS Program Plan which will build on and expand the ``Department of Transportation's IVHS Strategic Plan,'' providing the detailed ``road map'' required to both plan and track progress toward deploying systems and technologies that support user services of the ITS program. The Program Plan is being developed based on the following set of ITS User Services: 1.0 Travel and Traffic Management 1.1 Pre-Trip Travel Information 1.2 En-route Driver Information 1.3 Route Guidance 1.4 Ride Matching and Reservation 1.5 Traveler Services Information 1.6 Traffic Control 1.7 Incident Management 1.8 Travel Demand Management 2.0 Public Transportation Management 2.1 Public Transportation Management 2.2 En-route Transit Information 2.3 Personalized Public Transit 2.4 Public Travel Security 3.0 Electronic Payment 3.1 Electronic Payment Services 4.0 Commercial Vehicle Operations 4.1 Commercial Vehicle Electronic Clearance 4.2 Automated Roadside Safety Inspections 4.3 On-Board Safety Monitoring 4.4 Commercial Vehicle Administrative Processes 4.5 Hazardous Material Incident Response 4.6 Commercial Fleet Management 5.0 Emergency Management 5.1 Emergency Notification and Personal Security 5.2 Emergency Vehicle Management 6.0 Advanced Vehicle Safety Systems 6.1 Longitudinal Collision Avoidance 6.2 Lateral Collision Avoidance 6.3 Intersection Collision Avoidance 6.4 Vision Enhancement for Crash Avoidance 6.5 Safety Readiness 6.6 Pre-crash Restraint Deployment 6.7 Automated Vehicle Operation The Program Plan will include estimated milestones for each user service which will form the basis for selecting an area for operational tests. Several notices may be issued during the year to solicit specific operational tests based on milestones established for each user service, as will be outlined in the National ITS Program Plan, when completed. To obtain a copy of the latest draft of the ITS National Program Plan, please provide a self-addressed label to: Federal Highway Administration, HTV-10, 400 Seventh Street SW., room 3400, Washington, DC. 20590. Additionally, a brief synopsis of existing operational tests is provided in a publication titled ``Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (IVHS) Projects, March 1994'' (DOT Publication No. HTV-10/4- 94(7M)QE). To obtain a copy, please provide a self-addressed label to: Federal Highway Administration, HTV-20, 400 Seventh Street SW., room 3400, Washington, DC. 20590. Proposed Operational Tests The information below further describes the operational tests needed in the identified focus areas. It is the DOT's intention to fund offers in these areas. These are listed in order of the user service numbering sequence identified in the program plan. 1. International Border Electronic Clearance (Commercial Vehicle Electronic Clearance--User Service 4.1) An operational test is needed to evaluate strategies to facilitate the movement of commercial traffic at highway crossings along the United States-Mexico border. This test would involve the development of electronic credentials and records that could be used to automatically verify the identity of the shipper, and the nature of the cargo, check carrier safety and credential records. The purpose of this test is to extend the electronic clearance concept for State border crossings to the Mexican border and support the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). By working with Mexico, a more efficient traffic flow could be provided at border crossings and the deployment of technologies in this country could ultimately prevent overweight, unsafe, or improperly registered vehicles from entering the United States. The development of this test, while based on advanced technologies, will be dependent on the resolution of a number of legal, technical, and institutional issues. The test will also have to address specialized enforcement and cargo issues associated with crossing national borders. Automating the international border crossing process will require the involvement and cooperation of the immigration and customs organizations of the countries as well as shippers, carriers, local officials from the border States and provinces, and other relevant parties. While the general framework for this concept might be the same for crossings along the border, specific system designs will have to accommodate the variations in border crossing, laws, and language. The DOT is committed to accelerating testing activities in the area of International Border Electronic Clearance to provide early deployment successes in support of the NAFTA and other related ITS activities. Proposals submitted should reflect this commitment with realistic, aggressive time schedules and completion dates. 2. Automated Collision Notification (Emergency Notification and Personal Security--User Service 5.1) An operational test is needed to evaluate the improvements in safety and efficiency of emergency services offered by systems that provide automatic notification of automobile collisions. In automobile crashes involving life-threatening injuries, time is the most critical factor in saving lives, therefore, rapid notification and response by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel is a necessity. The primary goal of automatic collision notification is to reduce these times for medical assistance in those incidents involving serious injury, where the occupants of the vehicle are incapacitated and unable to notify authorities on their own. The operational test will include an in-vehicle collision notification system which would determine that a serious collision has occurred, and then automatically transmit information about the occurrence of the collision to the proper authorities. This system should have the capability to accurately sense vehicle location, to sense that the vehicle has been in a collision, and ideally to provide additional information with regard to the severity of the collision and/or likely injuries. A report by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (``Technology Alternatives for an Automated Collision Notification System,'' January 1994, publication no. FS-94- 008, available from Mr. Ray Yuan at (301) 953-6356) provides background on alternative technologies for crash sensing, communicating the crash occurrence, and fixing the position of a crash. The NHTSA will contract with an independent party who is not a member of the partnership to conduct the independent evaluation of this operational test. The offeror, however, should address those selection criteria (listed below) involving scheduling, funding, and responsibilities of members of the partnership in the conduct of the evaluation. The proposal should also discuss how the partners will address the protection of the rights and welfare of participants as spelled out in NHTSA Order 700-1. Persons wishing to obtain a copy of NHTSA Order 700-1 are directed to the NHTSA individual named above under the heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 3. Intelligent Cruise Control (Longitudinal Collision Avoidance--User Service 6.1) An operational test is needed to evaluate improvements in safety offered by Intelligent Cruise Control (ICC) systems. The operational test should include appropriate number of vehicles with an in-vehicle ICC system which would control vehicle speed and headway and should not require active communications from other vehicles or roadside equipment. This system should, at a minimum, have the capability to sense distance and relative velocity of other vehicles, accurately control vehicle speed and headway, and to disregard vehicles in adjacent lanes. The primary purpose of ICC systems is a higher level of convenience than is normally offered with standard cruise control, however these systems have the potential for decreasing the number and severity of rear end collisions. The evaluation will address both aspects of ICC. The proposal should discuss how the partners will address the protection of the rights and welfare of participants as spelled out in NHTSA Order 700-1. Persons wishing to obtain a copy of NHTSA Order 700- 1 are directed to the NHTSA individual named above under the heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Proposed Nontechnical Activity Areas The operational test program provides an ideal opportunity to assess major institutional and legal challenges inherent in implementing ITS. The DOT is interested in working with several of the selected partnerships to evaluate new approaches that: (1) Speed up the process for executing an ITS partnership agreement; (2) provide for innovative procurement methods; or (3) provide for innovative financing strategies. Specifically, the DOT's support may include:Administrative assistance to facilitate initial cooperation and communication among the project participants during the preagreement process. The intent is to involve all project participants, including contractors and subgrantees, as well as contract, technical, and legal staff of the project partners. Funding assistance to State and local governments to conduct innovative procurements and expedite the procurement process, particularly for complex, highly technical systems, in connection with the test. This assistance may include development of an acquisition plan, preparing statements of work and other contract documents. Funding assistance for the legal and consulting services and other costs necessary to implement new funding approaches, such as user fees, franchise fees, or use of venture capital to leverage private investment in ITS. Interested offerors are requested to indicate their willingness to participate in any of these initiatives and provide additional information to support the decision for selection. Evaluation Evaluation is an integral part of each operational test and critical to the success of the National ITS Program. The DOT Operational Test Evaluation Guidelines, dated November, 1993, provides information on established guidelines and methodology for the evaluation of operational tests. Persons wishing to obtain a copy of the DOT Operational Tests Evaluation Guidelines are directed to the first FHWA individual named above under the heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The evaluation guidelines, that shall apply to all operational tests funded in whole or part with Federal ITS funds, are as follows: 1. Individual operational tests will be structured within and have objectives which are consistent with the DOT's Program Plan for ITS. This will guide the development of the evaluation goals of each operational test. 2. The DOT will perform the role of evaluation coordinator for all operational tests. As evaluation coordinator, the DOT or its agent will work with the other partners in establishing individual test objectives, including the national, as well as local, goals and objectives that must be addressed during the evaluation; in developing the overall evaluation plan and the detailed experimental design; and in conducting the actual evaluation. 3. The DOT will conduct the evaluation or require that it be conducted by an independent party who is not a member of the partnership responsible for the operational test. The DOT reserves the right to conduct any additional evaluation deemed necessary to satisfy the national objectives of the ITS Program. Where the evaluation is conducted by a party retained by the non-Federal partners, the DOT shall retain approval authority to ensure the evaluation is acceptable and unbiased. 4. The ITS Partnership Agreement or other documents used to establish the operational test and funding arrangements between the DOT and the other partners will include language to require that an evaluation plan be prepared in the early phases of the operational test. There will also be language in all the agreements that incorporates the provisions of these guidelines. 5. The operational test funding plan shall separately account for the evaluation phase. Funds identified for the test evaluation shall not be spent for other portions of the operational tests. The DOT shall negotiate with the other partners during the initial operational test definition to ensure an adequate estimate of the funding necessary to meet the national evaluation objectives. 6. Funding to proceed with detailed systems design and implementation for the operational test shall not normally be provided until an evaluation plan has been approved by the DOT. Subsequent approval stages will be specified in the ITS Partnership Agreement to ensure adequate development of the test and its evaluation. Funding for each test may be provided incrementally to allow for the adequate completion of each of the defined milestones. 7. Nothing in these guidelines shall preclude the non-Federal partners from conducting additional evaluations for their specific needs. The non-Federal partners are expected to be involved in specific phases of the evaluation. At a minimum, the non-Federal partners are expected to be part of the process to develop the goals and objectives of the test and the overall evaluation plan. These partners will also be involved in much of the technical, legal, and institutional data collection, archiving, and reporting. 8. The DOT reserves the right to require that additional data be collected and made available to allow the DOT to make comparative analyses with similar functions or features associated with other national operational tests. In all tests, an independent and comprehensive test evaluation must be undertaken. The offer should indicate how the independent evaluation will be accomplished and include an estimate of the evaluation cost. Once the operational test project is underway, the independent evaluator should be brought into the process just before or, at the latest, during the development of the detailed evaluation work plan. Partnership An ITS operational test will typically involve a carefully crafted partnership that is negotiated among Federal, State, local, private, and other institutions. A partner is an entity that participates directly in the preparation of the operational test offer and plays a substantial role in defining the scope of the operational test, technologies included, and financial participation. Management of the operational tests, including funding, technical and administrative responsibilities, is shared among the partners in the operational test. Although an independent evaluator is not considered a formal member of the partnership, the offer can identify a proposed independent evaluator. Potential private sector partners in ITS operational tests are encouraged, when appropriate, to work with appropriate State and local transportation agencies or other public sector organizations in the preparation of proposed cooperative ventures. Partners are also strongly encouraged to seek participation from certified Minority Business Enterprise firms, Women Business Enterprise firms, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise firms, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and other minority colleges. Offerors are also encouraged to seek opportunities that provide for the use of existing defense and space technologies for ITS applications. Funding In accordance with Sec. 6058 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, Pub. L. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2194, the maximum share of an operational test funded from Federal funds, including ITS funds, cannot exceed 80 percent. The remaining 20 percent must be from non-federally derived funding sources and must consist of either cash, substantial equipment contributions which are wholly utilized as an integral part of the project, or personnel services dedicated full-time to operational test purposes for a substantial period, as long as these staff are not otherwise supported with Federal funds. The non-federally derived funding may come from State, local government, or private sector partners. In an ITS partnership, as with other DOT cost-share contracts, it is inappropriate for a fee or profit to be included in the proposed budget. This prohibition on the inclusion of a fee or profit applies to all partners to the proposed operational test. This does not prohibit appropriate fee or profit payments to vendors or others which may provide goods or services to the partnership. For example, equipment vendors, software providers, and entities retained for comprehensive operational test evaluation purposes would not be subject to this prohibition. The DOT, the Comptroller General of the U.S., and, if appropriate, the States have the right to access all documents pertaining to the use of Federal ITS funds and non-Federal contributions. Non-Federal partners must submit sufficient documentation during final negotiations and on a regular basis during the life of the operational test to substantiate these costs. This includes items such as direct labor, fringe benefits, material costs, consultant costs, subcontractor costs, and travel costs. In order to maximize available Federal ITS dollars and be consistent with agency policy, prospective partners are encouraged to increase their cost share to 50 percent. Additional funds provided over the required 20 percent minimum may come from a variety of funding sources and may include the value of federally-supported projects directly associated with the ITS operational test. Funding levels vary significantly between operational tests and are primarily based on size, complexity, and funding commitment by each of the partners. Federal ITS funding for the operational tests selected from the open solicitation in FY 1993 and FY 1994 ranged from $200,000 to $5.5 million, with most of the tests falling in the $1 to $2 million range. Operational Test Offer Preparation An offer to participate in the operational test program should contain sufficient information to enable an evaluation of the offer based on the selection criteria set forth below. The offer shall not exceed 50 pages in length including title, index, tables, maps, appendices, abstracts, and other supporting materials. A page is defined as one side of an 8\1/2\ by 11 inch paper, with a type font no smaller than 12 point. Offers greater than 50 pages will not be accepted. Ten copies plus an unbound reproducible copy of the offer shall be submitted. The cover sheet or front page of the offer should include the name, address, and phone number of an individual to whom correspondence and questions about the offer may be directed. The offer should contain details regarding the operational test schedule and budget. The schedule should show major milestone events including evaluation phases. The budget should show the requested Federal ITS funding and proposed partnership match funding (for FY 1995 and future years) by the activities shown on the table below. The matching funds should be further divided into public and private contribution amounts on the table as well as the source and type of contribution described in the proposal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 1995 amount Total amount Description of ---------------------------------------------------- contribution Activities Federal ITS Matching Federal ITS Matching ------------------------- funds funds funds funds Public Private ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design Development Implementation Operation/Maintenance Evaluation Project Management Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the budget should include the following: 1. Detailed costs for the major operational test components such as operational test management, hardware and software design, technical development and integration of project elements, installation and start up, operation and maintenance for the duration of the evaluation, data collection, analysis and evaluation, and reporting. 2. Summarized costs which show the value of the resources needed for fiscal year (FY) 1995 as well as future years under the following three categories: Federal ITS funds, other public funds, and private funds. Review Process A formal review process has been established to evaluate responses to this notice soliciting participation in the ITS operational test program. The Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications, ITS Operational Test Division, of the FHWA is responsible for coordinating the formal review and selection with representatives from the FHWA, FTA, NHTSA, RSPA, and the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. Representatives from the DOT modal administrations with expertise in key technological or program areas will serve on a technical review team(s). The technical review team(s) will perform a detailed review of the offer based on requirements of this solicitation and the following selection criteria. Selection Criteria The selection criteria set forth below supersede the criteria presented in the previous operational test notices dated May 8, 1992 (57 FR 19959), July 20, 1992 (57 FR 32047), and September 8, 1993 (58 FR 47310). 1. Relationship to National Program The Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Directly support the national goals and milestones of the user service areas described in this solicitation; (b) Advance the development and eventual implementation of the proposed technology or system. Demonstrate that there is an acceptable basis for believing that the technologies being tested will ultimately be successfully deployed or implemented; (c) Have meaningful, distinguishable features involving technical, institutional, market, or other important characteristics which have not been addressed in operational tests to date. Operational tests should not replicate past or current tests unless such replication provides a significant contribution to advancing the ITS program; (d) Fit within a logical evolution of the ITS program and supporting technology; and (e) Provide an approach that is technically feasible and responsive to the requirements of the user service area. 2. Evaluation In concert with the evaluation guidelines stated earlier, the Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Identify initial evaluation goals and objectives at the national and local level. These goals and objectives should reflect those activities required to move toward the national goals and milestones outlined in the ``Department of Transportation's IVHS Strategic Plan''. The evaluation goals and objectives should address, as a minimum, institutional issues, user acceptance, system benefits, costs, performance of the system, and impacts on the transportation system, including air quality; (b) Provide a general evaluation work plan that outlines the scope and method of evaluation of each goal and objective and an assessment of the opportunity to collect the necessary data that can answer questions of both local and national significance; (c) Provide for selection of an independent evaluator to ensure an unbiased evaluation of the operational test. The evaluator's responsibilities should be identified in the offer; and (d) Provide estimated overall costs for conducting the evaluation. The costs of data collection and evaluation should be identified as separate items. 3. Project Management and Proposed Partnership The Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Provide an overall level of confidence that the test will be successfully completed by: (1) Demonstrating an acceptable level of commitment, management capability, and business reliability of the partners. (2) Demonstrating that there is a commitment by all partners to a national technology sharing effort and a willingness to dedicate the time and effort required to share the technical and institutional results of the test with others. (3) Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of the principal partners and staff and demonstrating that they have the ability to perform their assigned responsibilities. For large or complex tests, an experienced systems manager to support the project is desirable. (b) Provide sufficient background to validate the accuracy of the cost and schedule estimates for the operational test; (c) Minimize any potential negative effects of the test and demonstrate an awareness of and approach for dealing with complicating technical or institutional factors which might adversely affect the test. Innovative or technically challenging ways for dealing with these factors will be of particular interest; (d) Identify the proposed agreements for sharing of technology developed under this operational test; and (e) Identify long range plans for full scale deployment of the technologies when the operational test has been successfully completed. 4. Suitability of the Test Site, Vehicle Fleet, and Infrastructure The Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Demonstrate that the operational test is part of a continuing, ongoing transportation management program or that there is a good opportunity for components of the operational test to evolve into operational systems after the testing is completed; (b) Demonstrate that the size and characteristics of the test and site are adequate for meaningful evaluation of the proposed system or technology and that the test and site have the operational or environmental characteristics to challenge the performance, reliability, and durability of the product or prototype being evaluated; (c) Ensure that local public transportation services are in place to provide a valid market test of the operational test technology and that the local public transportation providers are interested in the adoption of new technologies; (d) Provide the opportunity to evaluate the safety and air quality benefits of systems or operations where such issues are important considerations; and (e) Ensure adequate records to support the project evaluation with regard to operation, reliability, costs, institutional issues, and maintenance of the device or system being tested. 5. Non-Federal Partners' Role The Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Clearly state who will be the principal staff dedicated to the operational test by partner(s) and indicate the amount of time each staff member is expected to devote to the test; and (b) Ensure non-Federal contributions shown are allowable costs according to the cost principles in OMB circulars A-21, A-87 or A-122 or 48 CFR Part 31, as applicable to the organization incurring the costs. Cost share arrangements should show enough detail to determine whether the resources being committed to the potential project are sufficient to ensure successful completion. Letters from all participants committing themselves to the project and specifically stating their financial commitment should be included with the offer. 6. Federal Role The Operational Test offer of participation shall: (a) Demonstrate that the Federal government role in the operational test is consistent with the Department's statutory role and responsibilities; (b) Provide for Federal participation in the design and conduct of the project evaluation to ensure that the project is independently evaluated on a national program scale; (c) Show that the proposed Federal ITS contribution to the operational test is consistent with the agency's ITS operational test funding policy and appropriate to the type and scope of the test; (d) Demonstrate that Federal ITS funds are not being used when regular Federal-aid, State, or private funds can and should be used or where the primary benefit of the operational test is in areas of private sector responsibility; and (e) Demonstrate that Federal participation in the proposed test is an appropriate use of the Federal Government's resources. Negotiation and Approval Process Final approval and announcement of the selected offers are expected to take several months from the date the offers are received. For those offers selected, the lead DOT agency will begin negotiations with the project partners to reach mutually agreeable terms for an ITS operational test, including financial and technical issues. The negotiations will result in a funding agreement that documents project tasks, roles of partners, a budget, and a schedule for project execution and evaluation. The funding agreement between the DOT and the partnership is arranged through one non-federal partner, typically a State agency, who then serves as the lead for all funding agreements among the partners. Other non-federal partners, including local governments, universities, and the private sector, could also serve as lead. Only upon successful completion of these negotiations would a partnership be formed. The funding agreement considers the partners of an operational test to be independent contracting parties, and not business partners for the purposes of sharing profits and losses. (Secs. 6051 through 6059, Pub. L. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914, 2189- 2195; 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48) Issued on: November 14, 1994. Rodney E. Slater, Federal Highway Administrator. [FR Doc. 94-28599 Filed 11-18-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-22-P