Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Nissan |
|---|
Topics: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Nissan Leaf
|
Christopher J. Bonanti
Federal Register
June 22, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36615-36617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15562]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Nissan
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full Nissan North America, Inc.'s,
(Nissan) petition for exemption of the Leaf vehicle line in accordance
with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard.
This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the
antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). Nissan requested confidential
treatment of specific information in its petition by letter dated
February 4, 2011. The agency addressed Nissan's request for
confidential treatment by letter dated April 27, 2011.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-443, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Mazyck's telephone number is (202) 366-4139. Her fax number is
(202) 493-2990
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated March 2, 2010, Nissan
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) for the MY 2012 Nissan Leaf
vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, Nissan
provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design,
and location of the components of the antitheft device for the Leaf
vehicle line. Nissan will install its passive transponder-based,
electronic immobilizer antitheft device as standard equipment on its
Leaf vehicle line beginning with MY 2012. Major components of the
antitheft device will include an immobilizer control module (BCM),
immobilizer antenna, security indicator light, electronic immobilizer
and vehicle control module. Nissan will also install an audible and
visible alarm system on the Leaf as standard equipment. Nissan stated
that activation of the immobilization device occurs when the ignition
is turned to the ``OFF'' position and all the doors are closed and
locked through the use of the key or the remote control mechanism.
Deactivation occurs when all the doors are unlocked with the key or
remote
[[Page 36616]]
control mechanism. Nissan's submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in Sec. 543.5 and the specific content
requirements of Sec. 543.6.
Nissan stated that the immobilizer device prevents normal operation
of the vehicle without the use of a special key. Nissan further stated
that incorporation of the theft warning alarm system in the device has
been designed to protect the belongings within the vehicle and the
vehicle itself from being stolen when the back door and all of the side
doors are closed and locked. If any of the doors are unlocked through
an inside door lock knob or any attempts are made to reconnect the
device after it has been disconnected, the device will also activate
the alarm. Nissan stated that upon alarm activation, the head lamps
will flash and the horn will sound. Nissan stated that the alarm can
only be deactivated by unlocking the driver's side door with the key or
the remote control device. Additionally, Nissan has incorporated a
``Security'' indicator light in the vehicle which it states will
provide a signal to inform the vehicle owner as to the status of the
immobilizer device. When the ignition key is turned to the ``OFF''
position, the indicator light begins flashing to notify the operator
that the immobilizer device is activated.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Nissan
provided information on the reliability and durability of the device.
Nissan stated that its antitheft device is tested for specific
parameters to ensure its reliability and durability. Nissan provided a
detailed list of the tests conducted and believes that the device is
reliable and durable since the device complied with its specified
requirements for each test.
Nissan provided data on the effectiveness of the antitheft device
installed on its Leaf vehicle line in support of the belief that its
antitheft device will be highly effective in reducing and deterring
theft. Nissan referenced the National Insurance Crime Bureau's data
which it stated showed a 70% reduction in theft when comparing MY 1997
Ford Mustangs (with a standard immobilizer) to MY 1995 Ford Mustangs
(without an immobilizer). Nissan also referenced the Highway Loss Data
Institute's data which reported that BMW vehicles experienced theft
loss reductions resulting in a 73% decrease in relative claim frequency
and a 78% lower average loss payment per claim for vehicles equipped
with an immobilizer. Additionally, Nissan stated that theft rates for
its Pathfinder vehicle experienced reductions from model year (MY) 2000
to 2001 with implementation of the engine immobilizer device as
standard equipment and further significant reductions subsequent to MY
2001. Specifically, Nissan noted that the agency's theft rate data for
MY's 2001 through 2006 reported theft rates of 1.9146, 1.8011, 1.1482,
0.8102, 1.7298 and 1.3474 respectively for the Nissan Pathfinder.
In support of its belief that its antitheft device will be as
effective as compliance with the parts-marking requirements in reducing
and deterring vehicle theft, Nissan compared its device to other
similar devices previously granted exemptions by the agency.
Specifically, it referenced the agency's grant of a full exemption to
General Motors Corporation for the Buick Riviera and Oldsmobile Aurora
(58 FR 44872, August 25, 1993), and Cadillac Seville vehicle lines (62
FR 20058, April 24, 1997) from the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard. Nissan stated that it believes that since
its device is functionally equivalent to other comparable
manufacturers' devices that have already been granted parts-marking
exemptions by the agency such as the ``PASS-Key III'' device used on
the 1997 Buick Park Avenue, the 1998 Cadillac Seville and the 2000
Cadillac DeVille, Pontiac Bonneville, Buick LeSabre and Oldsmobile
Aurora lines, the reduced theft rates of the ``PASS-Key'' and `PASS-Key
II'' equipped vehicle lines and the advanced technology of transponder
electronic security, the Nissan immobilizer device has the potential to
achieve the level of effectiveness equivalent to the ``PASS-Key III
device.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Nissan on the device,
the agency believes that the antitheft device for the Leaf vehicle line
is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; attracting attention to the efforts of
unauthorized persons to enter or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that Nissan has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Leaf vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
part 541). This conclusion is based on the information Nissan provided
about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Nissan's petition for exemption for the Leaf vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with the 2012
model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-
1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention
Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the disposition of all part 543
petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product
nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted
and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order
to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Nissan decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Nissan wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the
submission of a
[[Page 36617]]
modification petition for every change to the components or design of
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer
contemplates making any changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: June 15, 2011.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-15562 Filed 6-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P