Insurance Cost Information Regulation |
---|
Topics: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
|
Barry Felrice
Federal Register
September 13, 1994
[Federal Register: September 13, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 582 [Docket No. 94-73; Notice 1] RIN 2127-AF44 Insurance Cost Information Regulation AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this document, NHTSA proposes technical amendments to the insurance cost information regulations. Among the proposed changes are revising the term ``passenger motor vehicles'' to read ``passenger cars, utility vehicles, light duty trucks, and vans,'' and revising from January to March, the availability date of the insurance information. NHTSA also proposes making more explicit the limitations of the collision loss data, and proposes recommending that prospective purchasers contact insurance agents for more information. The technical amendments are proposed to make the insurance cost information more accurate. DATES: Comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking must be received by this agency not later than November 14, 1994. ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number referenced in the heading of this notice, and be submitted to: Docket Section, NHTSA, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. (Docket hours are 9:30 am to 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday.) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Orron Kee, Office of Market Incentives, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. Mr. Kee's telephone number is (202) 366-4936. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Insurance Cost Information Regulation 49 U.S.C. 32302(c) states that the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary) shall prescribe regulations that require passenger motor vehicle dealers to distribute to prospective purchasers information developed by the Secretary and provided to the dealer which compares differences in insurance costs for different makes and models of passenger motor vehicles based upon differences in damage susceptibility and crashworthiness. By delegation from the Secretary, NHTSA has been authorized to carry out the statute. On January 31, 1975, NHTSA published 49 CFR part 582, Insurance Cost Information Regulation (40 FR 4918). Part 582, as then promulgated, required that automobile dealers ``make available to prospective purchasers information reflecting differences in insurance costs for different makes and models of passenger motor vehicles based upon differences in damage susceptibility and crashworthiness.'' Part 582, however, did not specify information that dealers must provide. On March 5, 1993 (58 FR 12545), NHTSA published a final rule amending part 582. The rule complemented the 1975 rulemaking, and completed implementation of section 32302(c). The March 1993 final rule, which became effective April 5, 1993, requires dealers of new automobiles to make collision loss experience data available in booklets to prospective purchasers. The information to be provided in the booklet is specified in section 582.5, which requires inclusion of a complete explanatory text and updated data on auto insurance costs published annually by NHTSA. The mandatory text specified by part 582 relates to, among other topics, the limitations of the auto insurance cost data as a predictor of differences in insurance premiums. Essentially, those limitations result from the fact that most of the factors that insurance companies use to establish premiums relate to driver characteristics and, except for the vehicle's value, are not directly related to the vehicle itself. Thus, as the text explains, the fact that a vehicle's historical claims experience is somewhat better or worse than that of other vehicles in its class may not be reflected in the premium that an insurance company establishes for that vehicle. If the claims experience is reflected, it is likely to have only a small impact on the premium. The mandatory text also urges consumers to contact insurance companies if they wish to obtain precise information about actual premiums for particular makes and models of vehicles. Previous studies by NHTSA have revealed that the difference between the premiums charged by different insurance companies for the same car and driver is greater than the difference between the premiums charged by a given company for comparably-valued cars that have different claims experience. NHTSA believed the mandatory text would help to minimize consumer confusion by providing customers with an understanding of the uses and limitations of the auto insurance cost data. In specifying the yearly insurance cost data that accompanied the required text, NHTSA decided to rely on collision loss experience data collected and reported by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI), as the best available indicator of the effect of damage susceptibility on insurance costs. In the March 1993 final rule, NHTSA specified HLDI's December Insurance Collision Report as the data source for part 582. NHTSA decided to specify HLDI's December Report because it contains more current data and covers more vehicle models than other HLDI publications. The HLDI data is presented in a format that ranks the vehicles in each class from best to worst (with numerical values given for each vehicle). NHTSA specified this format because it determined the use of this ranking system should assist customers in evaluating the comparative performance of comparable vehicles. In the March 1993 final rule, NHTSA stated its belief that the HLDI information should be available as soon as possible after its publication date. Therefore, NHTSA stated its intent to publish the annual Federal Register document updating HLDI's December Insurance Collision Report data no later than January of the calendar year that follows HLDI's publication of the data. Proposed Amendments In this notice of proposed rulemaking, NHTSA proposes to amend part 582 by making certain changes in section 582.5, that specifies the text of the insurance cost information booklet. At present, the text specifies the date ``January [Year to be Inserted].'' In this NPRM, NHTSA proposes to revise ``January'' to ``March.'' The change to a later month will allow NHTSA adequate time to publish the comparative insurance cost information booklet. HLDI sends the December Insurance Collision Report data to NHTSA in mid-January. The data is then formatted for printing and distributed to automobile dealers by mail. NHTSA can thus expect that the booklet will be published by March of each year. Part 582 presently specifies a comparison of insurance costs for ``passenger motor vehicles.'' In this NPRM, NHTSA proposes to revise ``passenger motor vehicles,'' at appropriate places in Sec. 582.5, to read ``passenger cars, utility vehicles, light duty trucks and vans.'' The proposed revisions would make clear that ``passenger motor vehicles'' includes many vehicle types besides ``passenger car.'' In this NPRM, NHTSA also proposes to make certain changes to the required text that would make more explicit the limitations of the collision loss data. At present, the text in Sec. 582.5 explaining the data's limitations states that the collision loss data table does not include information about new models, models that have been substantially redesigned, and models without enough claim experience. In order to make clear that certain data should not be relied upon, NHTSA proposes to revise the third paragraph in Sec. 582.5 to state: The table is not relevant for new models or models that have been substantially redesigned for [YEAR TO BE INSERTED], and it does not include information about models without enough claim experience. At present, the fourth paragraph in Sec. 582.5 states that it is unlikely that a consumer's total premium will vary more than five percent depending upon the collision loss experience of a particular vehicle. Upon further review, NHTSA believes it would be more accurate to state that it is unlikely that a consumer's total premium will vary more than ten percent. This notice proposes that change. The reason for the change to ten percent is that the Insurance Services Organization (ISO) recommends insurance premium rates to its members. An ISO representative indicated to NHTSA that the collision cost data could result in an insurance premium reduction of ten percent rather than the five percent mentioned in the booklet ``Comparison of Differences in Insurance Costs for Passenger Motor Vehicles on the Basis of Damage Susceptibility,'' made available to motor vehicle purchasers. Finally, at present, Sec. 582.5 states that to determine the actual premium that a consumer will be charged for insuring a particular vehicle or for complete information about insurance premiums, the consumer should contact insurance companies directly. In this proposed rule, NHTSA proposes that Sec. 582.5 be revised to advise the consumer to contact insurance company agents directly. Amending the text to advise the consumer to contact the insurance company agents directly, reflects the fact that the consumer's first point of contact with insurance companies is the insurance company agent. Regulatory Impacts 1. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures This notice has not been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action and has determined the action not to be ``significant'' under the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures. The agency has determined that the economic effects of the proposed amendments are minimal, so that a full regulatory evaluation is not required. This NPRM proposes minor amendments to the insurance cost information regulation, so that the information to be provided to potential motor vehicle purchasers is more accurate. Assuming these proposals are adopted, any extra text that must be included in the information booklet would be minuscule. 2. Regulatory Flexibility Act In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, NHTSA has evaluated the effects of this notice of proposed rulemaking on small entities. NHTSA estimates there are about 24,000 dealers of new passenger motor vehicles. Many of the dealers would be considered small entities, that may be affected by this proposed rule. However, NHTSA believes that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of these small dealers. The rationale is that this rulemaking proposes minor editorial changes, resulting in a small amount of extra text in the insurance cost information booklet. The potential cost increments associated with this proposed rule should have negligible effects on the purchase price of new passenger motor vehicles. For these reasons, I certify that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 3. National Environmental Policy Act In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the agency has considered the environmental impacts of this proposed rule and determined that if made final, it will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. 4. Federalism This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12623, and it has been determined that the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 5. Civil Justice Reform This proposed rule would not have any retroactive effect, and it does not preempt any State law. Chapter 323--Consumer Information of 49 U.S.C. does not provide for judicial review of rules issued pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 32302. The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq., provides generally for judicial review of final agency action, which in certain circumstances may include this proposed rule. The Administrative Procedure Act does not require submission of a petition for reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court. Procedures for Filing Comments NHTSA solicits public comments on the issues presented in this notice. It is requested, but not required, that 10 copies be submitted. All comments must not exceed 15 pages in length. (49 CFR 553.21.) Necessary attachments may be appended to these submissions without regard to the 15 page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage commenters to detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion. If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim of confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and seven copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been deleted should be submitted to the Docket Section. A request for confidentiality should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth the information specified in the agency's confidential business information regulation. 49 CFR part 512. All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above for this notice will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Comments received too late for consideration in regard to the final rule will be considered as suggestions for further rulemaking action. Comments on this notice will be available for inspection in the docket. NHTSA will continue to file relevant information as it becomes available for inspection in the docket after the closing date, and it is recommended that interested persons continue to examine the docket for new material. Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their comments in the rules docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 582 Administrative practice and procedure, Insurance, Motor Vehicles. In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA proposes to amend 49 CFR part 582 as follows: PART 582--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 582 would be revised to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 32302, 32303; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.51. 2. Section 582.5 would be revised to read as follows: Sec. 582.5 Information form. The information made available pursuant to Sec. 582.4 shall be presented in writing in the English language and in not less than 10- point type. It shall be presented in the format set forth below, and shall include the complete explanatory text and the updated data published annually by NHTSA. MARCH [YEAR TO BE INSERTED] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENCES IN INSURANCE COSTS FOR PASSENGER CARS, UTILITY VEHICLES, LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS, AND VANS ON THE BASIS OF DAMAGE SUSCEPTIBILITY The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has provided the information in this booklet in compliance with Federal law as an aid to consumers considering the purchase of a new vehicle. The booklet compares differences in insurance costs for different makes and models of passenger cars, utility vehicles, light trucks and vans on the basis of damage susceptibility. However, it does not indicate a vehicle's relative safety. The following table contains the best available information regarding the effect of damage susceptibility on insurance premiums. It was taken from data compiled by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) in its December [YEAR TO BE INSERTED] Insurance Collision Report, and reflects the collision loss experience of passenger cars, utility vehicles, light trucks, and vans sold in the United States in terms of the average loss payment per insured vehicle year for [THREE APPROPRIATE YEARS TO BE INSERTED]. NHTSA has not verified the data in this table. The table represents vehicles' collision loss experience in relative terms, with 100 representing the average for all passenger vehicles. Thus, a rating of 122 reflects a collision loss experience that is 22 percent higher (worse) than average, while a rating of 96 reflects a collision loss experience that is 4 percent lower (better) than average. The table is not relevant for new models or models that have been substantially redesigned for [YEAR TO BE INSERTED], and it does not include information about models without enough claim experience. Although many insurance companies use the HLDI information to adjust the ``base rate'' for the collision portion of their insurance premiums, the amount of any such adjustment is usually small. It is unlikely that your total premium will vary more than ten percent depending upon the collision loss experience of a particular vehicle. If you do not purchase collision coverage or your insurance company does not use the HLDI information, your premium will not vary at all in relation to these rankings. In addition, different insurance companies often charge different premiums for the same driver and vehicle. Therefore, you should contact insurance company agents directly to determine the actual premium that you will be charged for insuring a particular vehicle. Please Note: In setting insurance premiums, insurance companies mainly rely on factors that are not directly related to the vehicle itself (except for its value). Rather, they mainly consider driver characteristics (such as age, gender, marital status, and driving record), the geographic area in which the vehicle is driven, how many miles are traveled, and how the vehicle is used. Therefore, to obtain complete information about insurance premiums, you should contact insurance company agents directly. Insurance companies do not generally adjust their premiums on the basis of data reflecting the crashworthiness of different vehicles. However, some companies adjust their premiums for personal injury protection and medical payments coverage if the insured vehicle has features that are likely to improve its crashworthiness, such as air bags and automatic seat belts. Test data relating to vehicle crashworthiness are available from NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program (NCAP). NCAP test results demonstrate relative frontal crash protection in new vehicles. Information on vehicles that NHTSA has tested in the NCAP program can be obtained by calling the agency's toll-free Auto Safety Hotline at (800) 424-9393. [INSERT TABLE TO BE PUBLISHED EACH MARCH BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION] If you would like more details about the information in this table, or wish to obtain the complete Insurance Collision Report, please contact HLDI directly, at: Highway Loss Data Institute, 1005 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201, Tel: (703) 247-1600. Issued on September 6, 1994. Barry Felrice, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 94-22545 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P