Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection |
---|
Topics: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
|
Barry Felrice
Federal Register
July 29, 1994
[Federal Register: July 29, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking, denial. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document denies a petition for rulemaking to amend Standard No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection, to allow the air bag and safety belt warning label and the utility vehicle label to be combined. NHTSA is denying this petition because the agency believes that the warning label must be short and have a consistent format for the message to be received. Further, allowing the combination of this label and another label would divert attention away from the warning. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel Cohen, Chief, Frontal Crash Protection Division, Office of Vehicle Safety Standards, NRM-12, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-2264. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 2, 1993, NHTSA published a final rule specifying that manufacturers must install air bags to satisfy automatic crash protection requirements. The final rule also required that labels bearing specified information related to air bags be placed in vehicles equipped with air bags and that additional, more detailed information about air bags be provided in the owner's manual. The September 2 final rule specified requirements for three air bag labels: (1) A warning label permanently affixed to the sun visor for each seating position with an air bag; (2) if periodic maintenance or replacement of an air bag was required, a maintenance label on the interior of the passenger compartment; and (3) if the warning label was not visible when the sun visor was stowed, an alert label affixed either on the sun visor in a manner that it would be visible when the sun visor was stowed or on the cover of the air bag. The September 2 final rule also specified that no information other than that required by the warning label was to appear on the same side of the sun visor as the warning label, and that no other information (other than the alert label) concerning air bags or the need to wear seat belts was to appear anywhere on the sun visor. On March 10, 1994, NHTSA published a final rule responding to two petitions for reconsideration and three requests for interpretation of the September 2 final rule. Of relevance to the current petition were amendments that (1) allowed the warning label and maintenance label to be combined and (2) permitted the placing of a utility vehicle label containing the language required by 49 CFR 575.105(c)(1) on the sun visor. On January 7, 1994, Chrysler petitioned the agency to allow the combination of the warning label and the utility vehicle label. The prohibition against placing other air bag or seat belt information on the sun visor in the September 2 final rule was intended to prevent ``information overload'' regarding air bags and seat belts. The agency believed that additional information could divert the attention of vehicle occupants and dilute the impact of the required information. NHTSA amended the prohibition in the March 10 final rule to allow the utility vehicle label to be placed on the opposite side of the sun visor from the warning label because: (1) The main emphasis of the utility vehicle label is the possibility of rollover; (2) the required statement concerning belt use is incidental to that message; and (3) the statements about seat belt use in the utility vehicle label and air bag label are similar. NHTSA further amended the placement prohibitions to make it clear that a maintenance label could be combined with the warning label. NHTSA required a uniform warning label in the September 2 final rule so that occupants are repetitively exposed to the same information. NHTSA limited the warnings on that label to those considered the most important, as persons are likely to have a limited time period for exposure to the warning. NHTSA is concerned that combining the warning label and a utility vehicle label in one label could defeat both these purposes. Chrysler provided no information to suggest that combining these labels would not divert attention and dilute the message of the air bag warning label. Based on the foregoing, there is no reasonable possibility that the order requested in the petition will be issued at the conclusion of a rulemaking proceeding. Therefore, this petition is denied. Issued on July 26, 1994. Barry Felrice, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 94-18512 Filed 7-28-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-M